From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- * '''FAS''': [[fas:xulchris|xulchris]] * '''Mail''': [[Special:Emailuser/Xulchris|E-Mail XulChris]]10 KB (1,340 words) - 13:19, 9 March 2009
Page text matches
- * [[User:xulchris|ChrisStone]] <code>XulChris</code>1 KB (165 words) - 20:20, 4 January 2009
- [12:13] <XulChris> is this the PC meeting? I have a couple items i need to bring up [12:14] <tibbs> XulChris: sort of; many members are on holiday.11 KB (1,652 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- * ChristopherStone (XulChris)1 KB (158 words) - 13:37, 28 May 2008
- * [[ChristopherStone]] (XulChris)1 KB (140 words) - 17:30, 2 December 2008
- ...arty repos?" Some disussions around this, the general consensus was "yes". XulChris will probably make a wiki page for guidelines (no rules -- people don't hav 00:15 < XulChris> | why dont we write a shell script that goes through the review checklist20 KB (2,991 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- * '''FAS''': [[fas:xulchris|xulchris]] * '''Mail''': [[Special:Emailuser/Xulchris|E-Mail XulChris]]10 KB (1,340 words) - 13:19, 9 March 2009
- xulchris1 KB (173 words) - 16:35, 16 March 2017
- [12:15] <XulChris> who is the god of rpm? [12:16] <rdieter> XulChris: he who must not be named. :)18 KB (2,684 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- * Christoper Stone (XulChris) had a licensing question about one of his packages. FESCo suggested that1 KB (196 words) - 08:01, 18 September 2016
- (09:19:47 AM) XulChris: i have a quick question (09:19:56 AM) f13: XulChris: shoot30 KB (4,724 words) - 18:55, 17 February 2010
- (09:23:17 AM) XulChris: can we quickly discuss php additions to packaging guidelines? (09:23:23 AM) XulChris: please31 KB (4,758 words) - 18:55, 17 February 2010
- (09:05:51 AM) XulChris: this is for non-pear php classes, pear classes still go under /usr/share/p (09:06:23 AM) XulChris: f13: php package needs to add /usr/share/php to the default include_path,21 KB (3,210 words) - 18:57, 17 February 2010
- 19:18 * | XulChris screams I'm not dead yet! 19:50 < XulChris> | that was easy ;-)20 KB (2,766 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- <tr id="t13:33"><th class="nick" style="background: #97974f"> XulChris</th><td class="text" style="color: #97974f">whats the diff between promotin ...yle="background: #407a40"> jwb</th><td class="text" style="color: #407a40">XulChris, promotion means the request goes from updates-testing to updates</td><td c44 KB (7,229 words) - 15:02, 18 February 2014
- <XulChris> why cant the "freeze" process become more of a "branch" process? <XulChris> no just branch devel to F8 or whatever, then f8 becomes the frozen bit and29 KB (5,124 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- (10:14:33 AM) XulChris: why not just recompile everything for EPEL? (10:14:49 AM) jwb: XulChris, because we don't want to do that50 KB (7,846 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- (10:10:14 AM) XulChris: personally i just send to fedora-extras in most cases because more people (10:13:00 AM) XulChris: im not fesco but i agree with rdieter42 KB (6,565 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- <XulChris> cant sanity checking of debuginfo files be done in rpmlint? <notting> XulChris: rpmlint uses binutils tools, which (IIRC) doesn't seem to like them. proba39 KB (6,669 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- <tr id="t13:53"><th class="nick" style="background: #97974f"> XulChris</th><td class="text" style="color: #97974f">did someone say multilib proble <tr id="t13:53"><th class="nick" style="background: #97974f"> XulChris</th><td class="text" style="color: #97974f">pygame needs blacklisted or som66 KB (11,067 words) - 18:41, 17 February 2014
- 19:38 < XulChris> | heya tibbs got your comments on my package, thanks 19:39 < XulChris> | tibbs: your comments said my package didnt have a %check section, but it33 KB (4,521 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008