< I18N | InputMethods | Meetings
previous meeting | next meeting
Agenda
Time:2009-09-16 0500 UTC
Place: #fedora-i18n at Freenode
Summary
- bugzilla
Log
{{{ (15:29:03) juhp: fujiwarat: bug 531696 is an ibus bug then? (15:29:11) dychen_ is now known as dychen (15:30:43) mishti [n=runa@nat/redhat/x-da8f0bb0a7c968e0] entered the room. (15:31:31) dychen: #start im meeting (15:32:00) dychen: ping Kaio, paragan, pravins, fujiwarat (15:32:11) pravins: hi dychen (15:32:30) fujiwarat: hi (15:32:37) Kaio: pong (15:32:44) dychen: hi pravins, fujiwarat, Kaio. (15:32:50) Kaio: dychen☺ hi (15:33:08) fujiwarat: juhp: Should we fix 531696 ? (15:33:19) dychen: Anything to talk about regarding input methods, ibus, and so on? (15:33:23) pravins: dychen: 2nd hi ;) (15:33:48) juhp: .bug 531696 (15:33:51) zodbot: juhp: Bug 531696 [abrt] crash detected in ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-2.fc12 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531696 (15:34:19) jassy left the room (quit: "Leaving"). (15:34:43) fujiwarat: juhp: As you know, the similar bug was fixed a few days ago. (15:34:43) juhp: fujiwarat: well I was wondering how to fix - it needs changes to both ibus and ibus-anthy or ibus*?? (15:34:58) juhp: fujiwarat: yes I know (15:35:04) jassy [n=jassy__@115.240.110.248] entered the room. (15:35:44) fujiwarat: The previous fix was to ignore "panel" preference and this bug is related to "general" preference. (15:35:55) juhp: ignore? (15:36:20) juhp: dychen: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/InputMethods/Bugs (15:36:44) juhp: fujiwarat: yeah I read the bug (15:36:54) juhp: so how to fix it? (15:37:07) pravins: .bug 531989 (15:37:10) zodbot: pravins: Bug 531989 [abrt] crash detected in ibus-rawcode-1.2.0.20090703-2.fc12 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531989 (15:37:20) fujiwarat: Currently I'm thinking to modify both ibus and ibus-anthy. (15:37:31) juhp: pravins: yeah you seem to have a few abrt too... (15:37:50) juhp: fujiwarat: ok and does it affect other IMEs too? (15:37:52) pravins: hmm, its not crashing in f11 but yeah in f12 its yes (15:37:57) juhp: ok (15:38:06) fujiwarat: I think it's better that ibus sends another preference likes "ibus-frame" than "general". (15:38:08) juhp: pravins: what's the difference? (15:38:15) juhp: yup (15:38:47) pravins: dont know exactly, but if one open oowrite and type using ibus-rawcode, and close the oowriter (15:38:53) juhp: tagoh3: confused about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525376 (15:38:57) pravins: then rawcode crashes (15:39:05) juhp: Alam added ibus to autostart?? (15:39:23) tagoh3: juhp: old feature in ibus (15:39:23) juhp: pravins: aha hm (15:39:36) juhp: tagoh3: ibus.desktop? (15:39:42) tagoh3: juhp: right (15:39:42) fujiwarat: juhp: Currently all the problem preferences should be ignored. So probably it doesn't effect other IMEs. (15:39:57) juhp: fujiwarat: ok (15:40:07) pravins: juhp: i think need to cross check once whether memory is leaking some where or not (15:40:14) juhp: fujiwarat: without crashing? :) (15:40:20) juhp: pravins: ok (15:42:04) fujiwarat: juhp: Yes, I mean once we setup the specification, ibus-anthy ignores the preferences. If abrt still reports something after the fix, it means the preferences should not be ignored. (15:42:09) tagoh3: juhp: dunno if phuang disabled that feature completely from ibus or apply a patch for Fedora only though. (15:42:42) tagoh3: juhp: you remember there were an option for that on the preference right. (15:43:43) juhp: tagoh3: I only remember he didn't want to remove the desktop file ;) (15:43:58) juhp: anyway basically agree we should drop it (15:44:06) juhp: fujiwarat: ok (15:44:39) ***juhp updates the summary (15:46:49) juhp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&field-1-0-0=bug_status&field-1-1-0=version&field0-0-0=component&query_format=advanced&remaction=&type-1-0-0=anyexact&type-1-1-0=anyexact&type0-0-0=regexp&value-1-0-0=NEW,ASSIGNED&value-1-1-0=rawhide&value0-0-0=^ibus.* (16:04:51) dychen: Kaio: does ibus-table has similar problem? (16:05:24) Kaio: dychen☺ crashing? (16:05:34) dychen: Kaio: Right. (16:05:51) Kaio: dychen☺ I thought it is ibus-table problem... (16:06:02) Kaio: dychen☺ ok it is ibus prob (16:06:15) Kaio: I have same prob on ubuntu 9.10 (16:06:58) juhp: dychen: abrt? (16:07:07) dychen: Mmm, maybe I should test with ibus-chewing. (16:07:23) dychen: juhp: Kaio: abrt? :-) (16:07:35) Kaio: dychen☺ abrt? XD (16:07:44) juhp: heh (16:07:48) Kaio: it was not set by me (16:07:58) juhp: dychen: what did you mean similar.......... (16:08:38) dychen: juhp: Just a thought. ibus-chewing use none of the message. :-) (16:08:45) Kaio: my exp is: 30-45 mins using -> app freezed at first key pressed (16:09:08) juhp: dychen: general, panel ?? (16:09:13) juhp: please specify (16:09:15) Kaio: and the app back alive (melted) after like 30sec to 1 min (16:09:28) juhp: Kaio: I think you are talking about something else? (16:09:33) Kaio: but the same prob still there (16:09:36) Kaio: ok (16:09:50) juhp: or I don't know what dychen is talking about :) (16:09:54) dychen: juhp: That's right. ibus-chewing does not send/receive ibus-message actually. (16:09:59) juhp: ok (16:10:13) juhp: I dunno if ibus-table uses that (16:11:37) Kaio: lidaobing said if no err messages to him, he couldnt fix that too (16:12:06) Kaio: dychen☺ are you mentioning same prob I am talking about? (16:13:54) dychen: Kaio: how about do some search against ibus-table and see if it use these messages? (16:14:22) Kaio: dychen☺ ok (16:14:44) Kaio: it crashes on author's latest source (16:17:32) ***juhp diffed ibus-1.2.0.20091014 and ibus-1.2.0.20091024 (16:17:53) juhp: I think I will request releng to tag the newer build (16:23:35) juhp: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3076 (16:23:45) juhp: there - not sure if releng will buy but anyway (16:23:49) juhp: getting rather late }}}