Category:In-progress fonts

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (only look for bugs in new state)
m (Fix broken link)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* make sure they've completed phases [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.a|2.a]] (and eventually [[Font_package_lifecycle#1|1]]) of our workflow,
 
* make sure they've completed phases [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.a|2.a]] (and eventually [[Font_package_lifecycle#1|1]]) of our workflow,
 
* read attentively our [[:Category:Fonts_packaging|fonts packaging]] section,
 
* read attentively our [[:Category:Fonts_packaging|fonts packaging]] section,
* adhere closely to our official [[Annotated_fonts_spec_template|spec template]].
+
* adhere closely to our official spec templates ([[Simple fonts spec template|1]],[[Fonts spec template for multiple_fonts|2]]).
  
  
 
{{Admon/important | Reviewers wanted! |
 
{{Admon/important | Reviewers wanted! |
Fonts listed there may need the attention of a friendly [[Fonts_packaging| reviewer]].}}
+
Fonts listed there may need the attention of a friendly [[:Category:Fonts_packaging| reviewer]].}}
  
 
Reviewer duties for font packages are explained in phase [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.b|2.b]] and [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.d|2.d]] of our workflow.
 
Reviewer duties for font packages are explained in phase [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.b|2.b]] and [[Font_package_lifecycle#2.d|2.d]] of our workflow.
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}}
 
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}}
[[Category:Fonts|In-progress packages]]
+
[[Category:Fonts|In-progress_fonts]]
 
[[Category:In-progress packages|Fonts]]
 
[[Category:In-progress packages|Fonts]]

Latest revision as of 10:40, 14 August 2010

Fedora Fonts


Fonts listed in this category are being worked on and are waiting to complete their review process.

Sometimes a packager bypasses the SIG workflow and wonders why no one is reviewing his submission. You can find and rescue those stealth review requests there. Please ask their submitters to:

  • make sure they've completed phases 2.a (and eventually 1) of our workflow,
  • read attentively our fonts packaging section,
  • adhere closely to our official spec templates (1,2).


Important.png
Reviewers wanted!
Fonts listed there may need the attention of a friendly reviewer.

Reviewer duties for font packages are explained in phase 2.b and 2.d of our workflow.

If you want to help a review just follow the review link listed on the font page. Once this process is finished, make sure the font page category is changed to Category:Packaged fonts.


Idea.png
Fonts in Fedora
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.