From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== Calendaring system  ===
=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


Discussion on this topic continues from last week. [[AdamWilliamson|Adam Williamson]]
Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.
said <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00094.html
</ref> that there are a couple of calendaring plugins which will allow for "days" will be allocated.


[[ClintSavage| Clint Savage]] mentioned that the point is that it should support caldev or something better<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00095.html</ref>
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


[[FrankChiulli|Frank Chiulli]] said<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00000.html</ref> on the @fedora-infrastructure-list that he had implemented the CSI Security policy and he was seeing some strange messages in the logs and asked if someone could help him with that.
[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.


</reference>
<references/>

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.