FWN/Beats/Infrastructure

From FedoraProject

< FWN | Beats(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Change Freeze Begins Tomorrow)
(FAS Dump Breakage)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html
 
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html
  
=== FAS Dump Breakage ===
+
=== Fedora Security Policy ===
  
[[MichaelSchwendt|Michael Schwendt]] wrote[2] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list that there has been an invalid entry returned by the FAS group dump for some time: <code>bbs,disabled,james francis toy iv,user,0</code>.  
+
[[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] wrote[3] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list about the proposed Fedora Security Policy. Mike asked that he would like everyone in the sysadmin-* group to be compliant with this policy.  
  
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00089.html
+
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00103.html
  
To this [[NigelJones|Nigel Jones]] added[2] that "The comma is part of the persons name, it needs to be either escaped or the delimiter changed (maybe a | or something)." Mike, however, said[3] that there aren't any comma's in that persons name, its in his email address.
+
On this thread several people commented about changes they would propose in iptables[4] & [5]
  
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00090.html
 
  
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00092.html
+
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00105.html
 +
 
 +
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00107.html

Revision as of 06:24, 26 January 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Why Puppet uses config instead of configs

susmit shannigrahi asked[1] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list asked why, in the fedora-infrastructure implementation of puppet when we add a new file, in the .pp file the path is written as puppet:///config where as the actual path of the file is in the configs directory. To this Jeroen van Meeuwen answered [2] by saying that the [config] fileserver mount may point to /path/to/configs which may allow this discrepancy to exist.

[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00084.html

[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html

Fedora Security Policy

Mike McGrath wrote[3] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list about the proposed Fedora Security Policy. Mike asked that he would like everyone in the sysadmin-* group to be compliant with this policy.

[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00103.html

On this thread several people commented about changes they would propose in iptables[4] & [5]


[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00105.html

[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00107.html