|
|
| (17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | {{Anchor|Virtualization}} | | {{Anchor|Virtualization}} |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | == Virtualization == | | == Virtualization == |
| | In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the | | In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the |
| − | @fedora-virt, @fedora-xen-list, and @libvirt-list lists. | + | @fedora-virt list. |
| | | | |
| | Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] | | Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] |
| Line 13: |
Line 14: |
| | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. | | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. |
| | | | |
| − | ==== Guest Bridge Configuration with libvirt and netcf ==== | + | ==== Virt Status Report ==== |
| − | [[AndrésGarcía|Andrés García]] | + | [[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]] |
| − | thought<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-November/msg00002.html</ref> he read somewhere that with [[Releases/12|Fedora 12]] there was going to be a way to configure virtual network bridges automagically", but was only aware of the manual<ref>http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Bridged_networking_.28aka_.22shared_physical_device.22.29</ref> means of configuration.
| + | posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report. |
| − | | + | Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target. |
| − | It is possible in to configure bridges using <code>virsh</code> thanks to the Network Interface Management<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Network_Interface_Management</ref> feature and {{package|netcf}}<ref>http://linux-kvm.com/content/netcf-silver-bullet-network-configuration</ref>. However, the process is manual and not in the GUI. [[DaleBewley|Dale Bewley]] blogged<ref>http://tofu.org/drupal/node/86</ref> about how to manually create a bridge in Fedora 12 using <code>virsh</code>.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Support for {{package|virt-manager}} integration is targeted<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Shared_Network_Interface</ref> for Fedora 13.
| + | |
| | | | |
| | <references /> | | <references /> |
| | | | |
| − | ==== New Release libguestfs 1.0.78 ==== | + | ==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ==== |
| − | [[RichardJones|Richard Jones]] announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2009-November/msg00023.html</ref>
| + | Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 |
| − | version 1.0.78 of {{package|libguestfs}}<ref>http://libguestfs.org/</ref>, the library for accessing and modifying virtual machine filesystems.
| + | compared to Fedora 12. |
| | | | |
| − | '''New Features:'''
| + | [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]] |
| − | * FUSE support so you can mount guest filesystems in the host <ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/browsing-guests-using-fuse/</ref>
| + | explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref> |
| − | * Support for btrfs, gfs, gfs2, hfs, hfs+, nilfs2, jfs, reiserfs, xfs<ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/filesystem-metadata-overhead/</ref>
| + | "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind |
| − | * Support for huge (multi-exabyte) sparse virtual disks<ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/petabytes-exabytes-why-not/</ref>
| + | Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was |
| − | * New partitioning API, supports GPT and more<ref>http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#guestfs_part_add</ref>
| + | rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is |
| − | * New tools:
| + | also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of |
| − | :* <code>virt-ls</code><ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/new-tool-virt-ls/</ref>
| + | kvm-83 and kvm-84." |
| − | :* <code>virt-tar</code><ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/new-tool-virt-tar/</ref>
| + | |
| − | :* <code>virt-edit</code><ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/virt-edit/</ref>
| + | |
| − | :* <code>virt-rescue</code><ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/virt-rescue/</ref>
| + | |
| − | * Windows Registry support, tools and library<ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/virt-win-reg-get-at-the-windows-registry-in-your-windows-guests/</ref> <ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/libhivex-windows-registry-hive-extractor-library/</ref>
| + | |
| − | * OCaml bindings for <code>virt-inspector</code>
| + | |
| − | * RELAX NG schema for <code>virt-inspector</code>
| + | |
| − | * New APIs: <code>utimens</code>, <code>vfs_type</code>, <code>truncate</code>, <code>truncate_size</code>, <code>lchown</code>, <code>lstatlist</code>, <code>lxattrlist</code>, <code>readlinklist</code>, <code>case_sensitive_path</code>, <code>find0</code>, <code>mkfs_b</code>, <code>mke2journal</code>, <code>and more ...
| + | |
| − | * New program: OCaml viewer<ref>http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/graphical-virt-df/</ref>
| + | |
| − | * Allow stdout to be redirected when running guestfish remotely (Matt Booth).
| + | |
| − | * Remove requirement for vmchannel support in qemu (horray!) and the tricky main loop code.
| + | |
| | | | |
| | <references /> | | <references /> |
| | | | |
| − | === Fedora Xen List ===
| |
| − | This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| − | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen fedora-xen list].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==== No Xen dom0 in Fedora 12 Hopefully 13 ====
| |
| − | [[ZhangEnming|Zhang Enming]]
| |
| − | was disappointed<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2009-November/msg00019.html</ref> to learn<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Virtualization</ref> the pv_ops dom0 support<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0</ref> for hosting Xen guests, dropped in Fedora 9, is still not present in Fedora 12.
| |
| − | Zhang referenced numerous videos documenting success in creating "a fully working Xen pv-ops dom0 Fedora 11 host operating system."
| |
| − |
| |
| − | While there are experimental patches which may be applied<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue190#Dom0_Kernel_Status</ref> <ref>http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps</ref> to the kernel to enable support for dom0, they are not yet in the upstream kernel which forms the basis the Fedora kernel package.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It was decided<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2007-November/msg00106.html</ref> two years ago this month that
| |
| − | Fedora "simply cannot spend more time forward porting Xen kernels" and
| |
| − | "the plan is to re-focus 100% of all Xen kernel efforts onto paravirt_ops."
| |
| − | See FWN#137.<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue137#kernel-xen_is_Dead</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[PasiKärkkäinen|Pasi Kärkkäinen]]
| |
| − | noted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2009-November/msg00020.html</ref>
| |
| − | "pv_ops dom0 kernel has only recently started working for many/most
| |
| − | people, so it was too late for F12 release" and
| |
| − | "There are still some missing features, most notably missing blktap2 support
| |
| − | for tap:aio: file-based images."
| |
| | | | |
| | + | ==== ==== |
| | <references /> | | <references /> |
| | | | |
| − | === Libvirt List === | + | ==== ==== |
| − | This section contains the discussion happening on the
| + | |
| − | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==== Keeping Guest Configurations in Sync on Multiple Hosts ==== | + | |
| − | [[ThomasTreutner|Thomas Treutner]]
| + | |
| − | asked<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-November/msg00495.html</ref> "is there any best-practice how to keep VM definitions in sync across a couple of hosts? Is it reasonable to put {{filename|/etc/libvirt/qemu/}} on a NFS share?"
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[MatthiasBolte|Matthias Bolte]]
| + | |
| − | explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-November/msg00498.html</ref> "No, it's not safe to share {{filename|/etc/libvirt/qemu/}}", but also didn't find it necessary to keep the configs in sync.
| + | |
| − | "A migrated domain stays defined on the source node and is transient on
| + | |
| − | the destination node. A transient domain has no persistent config on
| + | |
| − | its node and is lost when destroyed."
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Matthias mentioned a patch<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-October/msg00318.html</ref> to the <code>virDomainMigrate</code><ref>http://www.libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainMigrate</ref> function by [[ChrisLalancette|Chris Lalancette]] which will be in {{package|libvirt}} 0.7.3.
| + | |
| − | The patch adds a new flag which will allow domains to be migrated persistently. Version 0.7.3 is targeted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-November/msg00480.html</ref>
| + | |
| − | for release on November 20th.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| | <references /> | | <references /> |
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the
@fedora-virt list.