Features/Artistic1Removal

From FedoraProject

< Features(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(perl-IO-Multiplex)
(Scope)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || thias
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || thias
 
|-
 
|-
| style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received.
+
| style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
Line 46: Line 46:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing.
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || perl-Net-Packet , perl-Net-Write , perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple , perl-Net-Packet-Target
 
| '''Dependency of''' || perl-Net-Packet , perl-Net-Write , perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple , perl-Net-Packet-Target
Line 55: Line 55:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
Line 73: Line 73:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
Line 82: Line 82:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
Line 91: Line 91:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || sindrepb
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || perl-Net-Packet
 
| '''Dependency of''' || perl-Net-Packet
Line 100: Line 100:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || pgadmin3
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || pgadmin3
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:yellow;"|'''Status'''        || In 2007, upstream agreed to relicense in principle, most contributors were ok with Artistic 2.0, then thread died off. Code is still under Artistic 1.0. Emailed upstream again on Friday, July 11, 2008 to try to restart the process. Upstream is working with the SFLC to try to relicense (confirmed via email on Sat July 12, 2008).
+
|  style="background-color:yellow;"|'''Status'''        || In 2007, upstream agreed to relicense in principle, most contributors were ok with Artistic 2.0, then thread died off. Code is still under Artistic 1.0. Emailed upstream again on Friday, July 11, 2008 to try to restart the process. Upstream is working with the SFLC to try to relicense (confirmed via email on Sat July 12, 2008). Package blocked in F-10, but likely to be revived at some point in the near future, so not killed off entirely.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
Line 109: Line 109:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || andriy
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || andriy
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:yellow;"|'''Status'''        || Spoke via IM with one of the developers (Pierre Smolarek <pierre@serverspy.net>), he is going to try to fast track a change to Artistic 2.0.
+
|  style="background-color:yellow;"|'''Status'''        || Spoke via IM with one of the developers (Pierre Smolarek <pierre@serverspy.net>), he is going to try to fast track a change to Artistic 2.0. Also reached original author and partial copyright holder via email (Steve Jankowski), who agreed to relicense under Artistic 2.0. (Sep 9, 2008).
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || nagios-plugins-game , xqf
 
| '''Dependency of''' || nagios-plugins-game , xqf
Line 118: Line 118:
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || jamatos
 
| '''Maintainer'''    || jamatos
 
|-
 
|-
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received. May be abandoned, last release in 2006.
+
|  style="background-color:red;"|'''Status'''        || '''DEAD.PACKAGE''' I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received. May be abandoned, last release in 2006.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing
 
| '''Dependency of''' || Nothing

Revision as of 23:05, 9 September 2008

Contents

Artistic 1.0 Removal

Summary

Remove all packages licensed under only the Artistic 1.0 license before Fedora 10.

Owner

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 10
  • Last updated: Tue Sep 9, 2008
  • Percentage of completion: 75%

Detailed Description

Fedora has some legacy packages which are only available under the Artistic 1.0 license. This license is not a permitted license in Fedora.

Why?

  1. The FSF says it isn't free. They say that the text is vague, and that it is open to misinterpretation.
  2. The perl community (the original authors) agrees with this assessment. They went so far as to rewrite the Artistic license to resolve all the identified problems (see http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_2_0).
  3. The OSI has "superseded" the license, recommending strongly that all users move to Artistic 2.0: http://opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-1.0.php

Over the last year, I've tracked down the upstream copyright holders for the majority of these packages, and was able to successfully relicense most of them.

Benefit to Fedora

Adherence to our licensing policies. Gets Fedora closer to the possibility of a "Free" Spin. Avoids potentially expensive and painful lawsuits.

Scope

The following Fedora packages are currently Artistic 1.0 only:

d4x

Maintainer thias
Status DEAD.PACKAGE I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received.
Dependency of Nothing

perl-Class-Gomor

Maintainer sindrepb
Status DEAD.PACKAGE Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing.
Dependency of perl-Net-Packet , perl-Net-Write , perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple , perl-Net-Packet-Target

perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple

Maintainer sindrepb
Status DEAD.PACKAGE Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
Dependency of Nothing

perl-IO-Multiplex

Maintainer lmb
Status I was able to reach one of the two copyright holders and get approval for relicensing to Artistic 2.0 via email (Tue Sep 9, 2008), but I still need to reach the other one.
Dependency of perl-Net-Server , conmux

perl-Net-Packet

Maintainer sindrepb
Status DEAD.PACKAGE Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
Dependency of Nothing

perl-Net-Packet-Target

Maintainer sindrepb
Status DEAD.PACKAGE Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
Dependency of Nothing

perl-Net-Write

Maintainer sindrepb
Status DEAD.PACKAGE Corresponded with upstream by email in 2007, upstream uncomfortable with Artistic 2.0, unwilling to relicense "just for Fedora". Emailed again on Friday July 11, 2008 to see if they are more willing now. Upstream replied on Saturday, July 12, 2008 that they have no intention of relicensing. (Same upstream as perl-Class-Gomor)
Dependency of perl-Net-Packet

pgadmin3

Maintainer pgadmin3
Status In 2007, upstream agreed to relicense in principle, most contributors were ok with Artistic 2.0, then thread died off. Code is still under Artistic 1.0. Emailed upstream again on Friday, July 11, 2008 to try to restart the process. Upstream is working with the SFLC to try to relicense (confirmed via email on Sat July 12, 2008). Package blocked in F-10, but likely to be revived at some point in the near future, so not killed off entirely.
Dependency of Nothing

qstat

Maintainer andriy
Status Spoke via IM with one of the developers (Pierre Smolarek <pierre@serverspy.net>), he is going to try to fast track a change to Artistic 2.0. Also reached original author and partial copyright holder via email (Steve Jankowski), who agreed to relicense under Artistic 2.0. (Sep 9, 2008).
Dependency of nagios-plugins-game , xqf

rman

Maintainer jamatos
Status DEAD.PACKAGE I've emailed the upstream authors, last email sent Friday July 11, 2008, no response ever received. May be abandoned, last release in 2006.
Dependency of Nothing

Test Plan

Realistically, there is no test plan. These packages will be gone from Fedora.

User Experience

Any users expecting these packages to be in Fedora will experience their absense, however, I suspect most of these packages are not widely used.

Dependencies

Package dependencies are described above.

Contingency Plan

We don't pull these items out.

Documentation

No need, aside from the Release Notes.

Release Notes

In accordance with the Fedora Licensing policy, we have removed some packages which were only available under the Artistic 1.0 license. Specifically:

  • d4x
  • perl-Class-Gomor
  • perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple
  • perl-IO-Multiplex
  • perl-Net-Packet
  • perl-Net-Packet-Target
  • perl-Net-Write
  • pgadmin3
  • qstat
  • rman

We no longer permit code in Fedora under the Artistic 1.0 license for a variety of reasons:

  1. The FSF says it is not a free license. They say that the text is vague, and that it is open to misinterpretation.
  2. The Perl community agrees with this assessment. They went so far as to rewrite the Artistic license to resolve all the identified problems (see http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_2_0).
  3. The OSI has "superseded" the license, recommending strongly that all users move to Artistic 2.0: http://opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-1.0.php

Fedora has made every effort to track down the upstream copyright holders for these packages, and was either unable to reach them or they were unwilling or unable to relicense.

Please note: Packages which are dual-licensed where one of the licenses is Artistic 1.0 are still permissable in Fedora (as long as the other license is on the "Good Software Licenses" list at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses), only packages which are solely licensed under Artistic 1.0 are no longer acceptable.