Features/BetterWebcamSupport

From FedoraProject

< Features(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Test Plan)
(Test Plan)
Line 68: Line 68:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Philips ??? || 05a9:0518 || ov518 || ? || Does not work [http://www.rastageeks.org/ov51x-jpeg/index.php/Main_Page out of tree driver]
 
| Philips ??? || 05a9:0518 || ov518 || ? || Does not work [http://www.rastageeks.org/ov51x-jpeg/index.php/Main_Page out of tree driver]
 +
|-
 +
| Philips SPC 200NC || 0471:0325 || zc3xx || HDCS2020 || Does not work
 +
|-
 +
| Creative ?? || 05a9:a511 || ov511 || ? || Does not work [http://www.rastageeks.org/ov51x-jpeg/index.php/Main_Page out of tree driver]
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 14:00, 26 July 2008

Contents

Better Webcam Support

Summary

Currently many webcams do not work with Fedora out of the box even though Linux driver exist for them, the intent is to fix this.

Owner

  • Name: Hans de Goede

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 10
  • Last updated: (Jul 26 2008)
  • Percentage of completion: 60%

Detailed Description

Webcams not working even though there are Linux drivers has 2 causes:

  1. The drivers are not in the mainline kernel
  2. Those drivers that are in the mainline kernel are often v4l2 while many applications will only work with v4l1. Even v4l2 apps often don't work with v4l2 webcam's as the webcams often have camspecific (compressed) pixelformats and most applications don't support all these,

1) Has been largely fixed by working together with gspca upstream to get gspcav2 cleaned up and merged, Linus has merged gspcav2 (through the v4l-dvb subsystem) for 2.6.27, this vastly improves the amount of supported webcams in 2.6.27. I'm currently working on getting the people behind the micromedia driver for the quite popular sonix sn9c20x based cams, to port their driver to a gspca subdriver and move the cam specific format decoding to userspace as was done with all the gspca decoding routines. The plan is to work together with the various upstreams to port any remaining standalone usb webcam drivers to gspca subdrivers, this is a process which will continue after F-10's release.

2) Has been fixed by creating a utility library which contains all the conversion stuff and v4l1 compatibility functions so that applications can easily be modified to work properly with v4l2 webcams, for more info on his library called libv4l, see: http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/3636.html

Also refer http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_26#head-6d4ee1ddea983f5c8ac491b8685a94ea6fa4132b

Benefit to Fedora

Out of the box working hardware makes for happy end users and good reviews.

Scope

This may require temporarily carrying kernel patches if drivers are clearly moving upstream, but not there yet in time for release.

This requires packaging libv4l for v4l1 emulation and format conversion and making modifications to webcam using applications so that they use libv4l.

Test Plan

I currently have access to the following webcams (in random order):

Webcam USB ID Bridge Sensor Status
Sweex WC001 0c45:6005 sn9c101 tas5110 works
Sweex WC004 0c45:6011 sn9c101 ov6650 works
Qware EasyCam 0c45:6028 sn9c102 pas202 works *
Intel Create and Share 0733:0401 spca501 integrated works
Creative Live! VISTA VF0420 041e:4064 ov519 OV7670 works
Trust WB-1400T 093a:2468 pac207 integrated works
I.T. Works webcam 093a:2460 pac207 integrated works
Logitech QuickCam IM/Connect 046d:08d9 zc3xx HV7131R works *
Labtec notebook cam 046d:08aa zc3xx HDCS2020 works *
Creative WebCam Vista 041e:403b spca561 integrated works *
Logitech QuickCam Express Plus 046d:092f spca561 integrated works *
Philips ??? 05a9:0518 ov518  ? Does not work out of tree driver
Philips SPC 200NC 0471:0325 zc3xx HDCS2020 Does not work
Creative ?? 05a9:a511 ov511  ? Does not work out of tree driver

(*) works, but does not work well in low light conditions

User Experience

Out of the box working hardware.

Dependencies

None.

Contingency Plan

Don't ship the drivers / wrapper if they aren't ready.

Documentation

None atm.

Release Notes

None, except that if this is finished in time it would be good to make some PR with this.


Comments and Discussion

See Talk:Features/BetterWebcamSupport