Legacy/Status

From FedoraProject

Jump to: navigation, search

Here are some thoughts put together by JesseKeating and DavidEisenstein on the current status of the Fedora Legacy project.

Contents

Fedora Legacy - status summary -- 2006-Jun-09 thru early Nov, 2006

We have

A. A bad reputation (source: http://lwn.net/Articles/204722/ ... confirmation: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-November/msg00032.html ).

A. Ongoing security maintenance work for rhl7.3, rhl9 (ending at end of 2006), fc3, fc4.

A. Arguably an over-complex, cumbersome process documented and in-place for pushing out security updates for Maintenance Mode Fedora Core releases that indeed needs revamping, streamlining, and prettifying to encourage many more volunteers to pitch in (see discussion among the postings of the "lwn article on the death of Fedora Legacy" thread at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/2006-October/thread.html#00029 , including some excellent posts by Jesse I M HO.)

A. People: (this letter perhaps a little dated)

Michal Jaegermann

John Dalbec

David Eisenstein

Marc Deslauriers

Pavel Kankovsky

Jeff Sheltren

(a few random people here and there)

Marc Deslauriers

Donald Maner

Jeff Sheltren

Pekka Savola

David Eisenstein

Jesse Keating (can sign and push, irregular contributor)

Marc Deslauriers (can sign and push, has been on holiday for a couple months)

David Eisenstein (recently started pushing, working on signing)

Jeff Sheltren (works on plague/mock)

Dominic Hargreaves

Pekka Savola

John Dalbec

Tom Yates

Eric Rostetter

David Eisenstein

Marc Deslarier

Pekka Savola

Pekka Savola

Eric Rostetter (fedoralegacy.org site, wiki)

Jesse Keating (fedoralegacy.org, wiki)

Jeff Sheltren (wiki)

David Eisenstein (wiki)

Rahul Sundaram (wiki)

http://fedoralegacy.org/

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy

download.fedoralegacy.org + a worldwide mirroring system

turbosphere.fedoralegacy.org.

A. Packages:

4 awaiting release

3 awaiting build to updates-testing

1 awaiting verify votes

0 awaiting publish votes

2 awaiting discussion

25 needing work

37 deferred (generally non-security fixes requested, possibly due to regression bugs in previous security fixes)

36 other (have not been given status, but mostly security bugs)

---

108 Pending Bugs

We need

A. More builders -- especially in light of http://lwn.net/Articles/204722/ ("LWN: An empty legacy") and ensuing discussion http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/2006-October/thread.html#00029 .

A. More testers

A. More testers

A. A fresh start, a new name, a lower load (?) -- see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-November/msg00032.html .

Where are we going?

This section outlines our migration plan to integrate with the Fedora Infrastructure , where Fedora Extras is located.

A. Plague instance for Legacy

A. A CVS tree for Legacy to use. (DONE, by Jesse Keating & Fedora Infrastructure)

A. A legacy group within the Fedora Account System

A. Publishing Software

A. Web presense within Fedora's Plone

Migration Progress

The Fedora Board has approved our plan to integrate. They have asked us to make it happen. Initial integration will focus only on supporting FC3 and above. Our target integration date was just prior to Fedora Core 6 Test 2 (See schedule ). Continued support of RHL7.3 and RHL9 is continuing until the end of 2006, though no new security issues are supposed to be entered after October 1st, 2006. FC1/2 support was dropped at FC6T2 (mid-August). If they are going to continue to be supported, they will have to be supported in the exisiting Legacy infrastructure.