From Fedora Project Wiki

(Add category)
m (internal link cleaning)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
* Joint meeting with Board and FESCo held on 2008-06-09
* Joint meeting with Board and FESCo held on 2008-06-09
** http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2008-06-09
** http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2008-06-09
** Proposed roles: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields/Drafts/Roles
** Proposed roles: [[User:Pfrields/Drafts/Roles]]
* The board has not change its stance that FESCo owns the feature process
* The board has not change its stance that FESCo owns the feature process
* Lengthy discussion about the path forward
* Lengthy discussion about the path forward

Latest revision as of 08:21, 18 September 2016

Fedora Project Board Meeting :: Tuesday 2008-06-10

Roll Call

  • Attendees: Steve Dickson, Chris Aillon, Matt Domsch, Bill Nottingham, John Poelstra, Paul Frields, Seth Vidal, Karsten Wade, Jeff Spaleta
  • Regrets: Dennis Gilmore

Followup to Previous Business

Fedora Organizational Structure (2008-06-03)

Future Business (discuss at a future meeting)

Codeina (2008-05-13)

  • Need to restart discussion on fedora-advisory-board@redhat.com to get plans in place at the start of F10
  • Chris Aillon to make contact with Bastien Nocera to find out what current plans are--still waiting for status


Secondary Architectures

  • ia64 is close to coming online and two issues need to be resolved to move forward:
  1. Packages are signed with a fedora-ia64 specific key and the repository keys are hard coded in the fedora-release package as the main Fedora and Fedora beta keys.
  2. The download baseurl (outside of the mirror lists, which are correctly handled) will be at secondary.fedoraproject.org (or whatever). Therefore they can not spin a release from Fedora packages.
  • Is this a board issue to resolve or simply an information update to the board to keep them updated?