From Fedora Project Wiki

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Roll Call

  • Present: Paul Frields, Chris Tyler, Colin Walters, Mike McGrath, Tom "spot" Callaway, Matt Domsch, Dennis Gilmore, John Poelstra, Christopher Aillon
  • Regrets: Josh Boyer
  • Assigned meeting secretary: Dennis Gilmore

Agenda

Election schedule

Paul Frields

  • STATUS: Newest drafts on Elections page, FAB, and project schedule
  • QUESTION: Is there anyone on the Board who cannot support the schedule? If so, what would have to change for you to do so?
    • ctyler: What happens in the event of a schedule slip?
      • pfrields: It's not necessary, but we could evaluate in the case that there was a substantial slip before the actual nomination, town halls, questionnaire tasks started.
      • We would not want to change the voting timeframe, for example, after it starts.
    • Mdomsch: if there was a slip early on we could postpone start of voting leaving the nominations as is
      • dgilmore: agreed
      • pfrields: agreed
  • ACTION: Paul to remove all draft notices
  • ACTION: John will add a link in the schedule to the Elections page
  • AGREED: Election Schedule approved as is

Spins (SWG)

Matt Domsch

  • User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins
  • Resolved and concluded
    • Page now shows actionable items that were taken for each issue found
    • mdomsch: asks if anyone has anything else to add
      • Letters sent to Spins SIG, who resoponded that you need to ask spin owners
      • Spin owners felt that the delivery of spins are ok.
      • Spin owners would like to be able to trim fat easier, especially light weight desktops.
    • All identified, actionable issues have tickets or responsible persons attached according to the page.
  • AGREED: Board agrees this item has been resolved successfully

User base (SWG)

John Poelstra

  • User:Poelstra/What_is_a_target_audience
  • User_base
    • QUESTION: Is there anyone on the Board who cannot support this statement? If so, what would have to change for you to do so?
  • jpoelstra: came up with the idea of creating a diagram to represent Fedora's user base
  • after further discussion at Monday's SWG meeting the members there felt it best not to block this topic on having a completed diagram
    • significant time was spent on making sure User_base met with everyone's approval
  • dgilmore: There may be problems with the diagram but it will be really hard to make it right for everyone. The wording on the page is clear
    • spot: Since we don't have an expert diagram artist :-) let's move forward
  • ACTION: Paul to remove draft notices, link from appropriate places,
  • AGREED: User_base is complete and Target Audience discussion is considered officially closed

Fedora UX designers (SWG)

Paul Frields

  • User:Pfrields/Desktop_user_experience_designers
  • Page has been updated with input from Board and Design team members
    • QUESTION: Is there anyone on the Board who cannot support this statement? If so, what would have to change for you to do so?
  • pfields: collaboration helped to make this clear and come up with the best possible result
  • Spot recommends that both Desktop SIG and Design tema link to this page
    • the big result of the page is to emphasize the opportunities and the practice of collaborative (not contesting) decision making in Fedora
  • ACTION: Paul will finalise the page and remove draft notices, and file with the SWG pages
  • ACTION: Paul to link from Desktop and Design team pages as appropriate
  • AGREED: The Board supports this page and the statements it makes.

Next meeting

  • Thursday 2010-04-15 UTC 1600