Package maintainer policy

From FedoraProject

Revision as of 13:26, 26 May 2008 by Timlau (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search


Fedora Package Maintainers Policies

This document should give you a quick overview of all the relevant policies for Fedora Package Collection. It covers only the most important things -- each section has a link to a document with more detailed explanations and examples that outline how to lay out the rules. For a full list of documents see the end of this document .

On maintaining packages

Who is allowed to modify which packages

Normally the maintainer that is listed as primary maintainer in the PackageDB (formerly this was owners.list) of a package is the only one who modifies the package or gives others permission (e.g. by accepting them as co-maintainers) to commit and build changes for that package. Bugzilla is normally the best way to contact the package maintainer or to send him patches and suggestions because it is neutral and trackable; but poking people once or twice in IRC or directly via mail might be a good idea.

But there are certain exceptions where the maintainer has to accept that other packagers will modify his packages. Those exception are described in detail below -- it mostly boils down to this:


  • a packager doesn't fix important bugs in time,
  • there are problems known that might be bad for the whole Project or a lot of users of the repo/a particular package,
  • the changes are quite minor or considered as a general cleanup to a lot of packages, or
  • the changes are part of a Fedora Objective, with a specific plan approved by FESCo,

then provenpackagers are allowed to fix stuff in other peoples packages.

Read on for more more details about this topic .

What to do if a Maintainer is absent

  1. Check if the non-responsive maintainer is on vacation. To see if the maintainer has been recently active on Fedora, fedora-active-user can be employed.
  2. File a bug against the package in Bugzilla asking for the maintainer to respond. This bug should list the outstanding issues they need to address. This is a must.
  3. After every 7 days, the reporter adds a comment to the bug report asking again for a response. Others can add to the bug that they also were not successful in contacting the maintainer, or providing additional contact information for the maintainer (i.e., alternative email, IRC, etc).
  4. After 2 failed attempts (2 weeks of no response from the maintainer), the reporter posts to the Fedora devel list with a link to the bug report and asks if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer.
  5. After other 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a formal request to the FESCo trac with the bug link, indicating all reasonable efforts to contact the maintainer have failed and that they wish to take over the package.
  6. If at least one FESCo member approves the takeover, and no one objects within 3 days, the reporter may take over the package.
  7. Once approval has been given, follow Package SCM admin requests to request ownership of the package. In addition to this, the new owner must also reassign all open bugs for this package to themselves.

Read on for more more details about this topic


PackageMaintainers/Policy/EncourageComaintainership,, from="^

Read on for more more details about this topic

Special rules for Packages with kernel modules

PackageMaintainers/Policy/KernelModules,, from="^

Read on for more more details about this topic

Fedora Maintenance Lifecycle Policy

PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL,, from="^

Read on for more more details about this topic

Review workflow

What to do with stalled reviews

PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews,, from="^

Read on for more more details about this topic


FESCo elections

PackageMaintainers/Policy/FESCoElections,, from="^

Read on for more more details about this topic

All approved Fedora policy documents

If you want more details look at the individual documents that cover the policies in depth: