Packaging:Ruby

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(%define => %global)
(Escape % in comment)
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Ruby Packaging Guidelines =
+
{{admon/warning|Different guidelines for packages in RHEL and Fedora 16| In RHEL 5 and 6, a ruby version that does not have all the features needed to support these guidelines exists.  If you're packaging for those distributions you should follow the [[Packaging:Old_Ruby | old ruby guidelines]] instead.}}
  
 +
{{admon/warning|Different Guidelines for Fedora 17 and 18| In Fedora 17 and 18 the ruby guidelines were slightly different.  Some of the macros and practices listed here did not work.  Please see this [[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Ruby&oldid=306009 earlier version of the guidelines]] if you want your package to work on those versions of Fedora}}
  
 +
{{admon/note|JRuby Gems| Although Fedora 19 has fully functioning JRuby integrated with system RubyGems, we have decided to not include the JRuby specific packaging guidelines here, as they need some more work. They will appear here as soon as we feel that we've got everything covered properly. You can contact us on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig Ruby-SIG mailing list] in case of any questions about the prepared JRuby packaging guidelines.}}
  
Each Ruby package '''must''' indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like
+
There are three basic categories of ruby packages: [[#RubyGems | ruby gems]], [[#Non-Gem Packages | non-gem ruby packages]], and [[#ruby_applications| applications written in ruby]]. These guidelines contain sections common to all of these as well as sections which apply to each one individually. Be sure to read all the guidelines relevant to the type of ruby package you are building.
 +
 
 +
== Ruby Compatibility ==
 +
 
 +
Each Ruby package '''must''' indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter. Use ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that:
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8
+
Requires: ruby(release)
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
If the package requires Ruby of certain version(s), make the requirement versioned like this:
 +
<pre>
 +
Requires: ruby(release) >= 1.9.1
 +
</pre>
 +
{{admon/note|Alternate interpreters| Alternate Ruby interpreters (currently JRuby) also <code>Provide: ruby(release)</code>. This implies, that pure RubyGems packages (these are shared among interpreters) '''should not''' have <code>Requires: ruby</code> or <code>Requires: jruby</code> to have their dependencies satisfied by any of these interpreters.}}
  
Ruby packages '''must''' require ruby at build time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby</code>, and '''may''' indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building.
+
{{admon/warning|Over specified ruby(release) versioning| Please note, that if the  <code>ruby(release)</code> version requirement is too specific, it may cause an unexpected interpreter to be drawn in. E.g. <code>ruby(release) &#61; 1.8</code> will require JRuby package, since it is the only package that provides it.}}
 +
 
 +
{{Anchor|interpreters_compatibility}}
 +
 
 +
=== Different Interpreters Compatibility ===
 +
Most of the pure Ruby packages will work on all Ruby interpreters. There are however cases, when the packages use interpreter-specific functions (like <code>fork()</code>) and won't run on other interpreters (JRuby). In this case, the package '''should''' require that interpreter. For example, a package that uses <code>fork</code> should explicitly specify <code>Requires: ruby</code>.
 +
In case of such package, packager '''should''' file a bug to ask upstream to provide support for other interpreter(s). This '''should''' be documented in specfile.
 +
 
 +
=== Shebang lines ===
 +
 
 +
On Fedora, <code>/usr/bin/ruby</code> is implemented via [https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick Rubypick].  Rubypick is a tool similar to RVM or rbenv. It allows choosing interpreter to execute Ruby script. Rubypick routes anything executed via <code>/usr/bin/ruby</code> to <code>/usr/bin/ruby-mri</code> or <code>/usr/bin/jruby</code>. By default, it runs MRI (Matz's Ruby Implementation), but user can explicitly specify the interpreter by using <code>_mri_</code> or <code>_jruby_</code> as a first parameter. For example:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
ruby _jruby_ jruby_script.rb
 +
gem _mri_ install foo
 +
rails _jruby_ s
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
Using the <code>RUBYPICK</code> environment variable can achieve the same results.  The environment variable can be used to set one interpreter as the global default:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
export RUBYPICK=_jruby_
 +
ruby jruby_script.rb  # Will use jruby
 +
gem install foo        # Will also use jruby
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
Ruby executables that are known to only run on one Ruby implementation '''should''' use that specific implementation in their shebang - <code>#!/usr/bin/ruby-mri</code> or <code>#!/usr/bin/jruby</code> to ensure that they run using that implementation.  All other code '''should''' use <code>#!/usr/bin/ruby</code>.
  
 
{{Anchor|ruby_naming}}
 
{{Anchor|ruby_naming}}
 +
 
== Naming Guidelines ==
 
== Naming Guidelines ==
{{Template:Note}} These naming guidelines only apply to ruby packages whose main purpose is providing a Ruby library; packages that mainly provide user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby do not need to follow these naming guidelines, and should follow the general [[Packaging/NamingGuidelines|  NamingGuidelines]]  instead.
 
  
The name of a ruby extension/library package '''must''' be of the form <code>ruby-UPSTREAM</code>. If the upstream name <code>UPSTREAM</code> contains <code>ruby</code>, that '''should''' be dropped from the name. For example, the SQLite database driver for ruby is called <code>sqlite3-ruby</code>. The corresponding Fedora package should be called <code>ruby-sqlite3</code>, and not <code>ruby-sqlite3-ruby</code>.
+
* Packages that contain Ruby Gems '''must''' be called <code>rubygem-%{gem_name}</code>.
  
A ruby extension/library package '''must''' indicate what it provides with a <code>Provides: ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION</code> declaration in the spec file. The string <code>LIBRARY</code> '''should''' be the same as what is used in the <code>require</code> statement in a Ruby script that uses the library.  The <code>VERSION</code> '''should''' be the upstream version of the library, as long as upstream follows a sane versioning scheme. For example, a Ruby script using the SQLite database driver will include it with <code>require 'sqlite3'</code>. The specfile for the corresponding Fedora package must contain a line <code>Provides: ruby(sqlite3) = 1.1.0</code>, assuming the package contains version 1.1.0 of the library.
+
* The name of a ruby extension/library package '''must''' start with the interpreter it is built for (ruby, jruby, etc) and then the <code>UPSTREAM</code> name. For example: <code>ruby-UPSTREAM</code>. If the upstream name <code>UPSTREAM</code> contains <code>ruby</code>, that '''should''' be dropped from the name. For example, the SQLite database driver for ruby is called <code>sqlite3-ruby</code>. The corresponding Fedora package should be called <code>ruby-sqlite3</code>, and not <code>ruby-sqlite3-ruby</code>.
  
== Build Architecture and File Placement ==
+
* Application packages that mainly provide user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby '''must''' follow the general [[Packaging/NamingGuidelines|  NamingGuidelines]]  instead.
The following only affects the files that the package installs into <code>%{_libdir}/ruby</code>, i.e., Ruby library files. All other files in a Ruby package must adhere to the general Fedora Extras packaging conventions.
+
  
=== Pure Ruby packages ===
+
== Macros ==
Pure Ruby packages '''must''' be built as noarch packages.
+
 
 +
Non-gem ruby packages and ruby gem packages install to certain standard locations.  The <code>ruby-devel</code> and <code>rubygems-devel</code> packages contain macros useful for the respective package types. Alternate ruby interpreters will have equivalent locations (To be added to this table later)
 +
 
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0"
 +
!Macro
 +
!Expanded path
 +
!Usage
 +
|-
 +
! colspan="3"|From ruby-devel; intended for non-gem packages.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{ruby_vendorarchdir}</code>
 +
|/usr/lib{64}/ruby/vendor_ruby
 +
|Place for architecture specific (e.g. *.so) files.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{ruby_vendorlibdir}</code>
 +
|/usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby
 +
|Place for architecture independent (e.g. *.rb) files.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{ruby_sitearchdir}</code>
 +
|/usr/local/lib{64}/ruby/site_ruby
 +
|Place for local architecture specific (e.g. *.so) files.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{ruby_sitelibdir}</code>
 +
|/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby
 +
|Place for local architecture independent (e.g. *.rb) files.
 +
|-
 +
! colspan="3" | From rubygems-devel; intended for gem packages
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_dir}</code>
 +
|/usr/share/gems
 +
|Top directory for the Gem structure.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_instdir}</code>
 +
|%{gem_dir}/gems/%{gem_name}-%{version}
 +
|Directory with the actual content of the Gem.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_libdir}</code>
 +
|%{gem_instdir}/lib
 +
|The <code>lib</code> folder of the Gem.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_cache}</code>
 +
|%{gem_dir}/cache/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem
 +
|The cached Gem.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_spec}</code>
 +
|%{gem_dir}/specifications/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gemspec
 +
|The Gem specification file.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_docdir}</code>
 +
|%{gem_dir}/doc/%{gem_name}-%{version}
 +
|The rdoc documentation of the Gem.
 +
|-
 +
|<code>%{gem_extdir_mri}</code>
 +
|%{_libdir}/gems/ruby/%{gem_name}-%{version}
 +
|The directory for MRI Ruby Gem extensions.
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
=== Interpreter independence and directory macros ===
 +
 
 +
You may have noticed that the table above has different directories for non-gem libraries on different ruby interpreters but only a single set of directories for rubygem libraries.  This is because code written for one ruby interpreter will often run on all ruby interpreters that Fedora ships (ruby, jruby, etc).  However, some code uses methods that are not available on all interpreters (see [[#interpreter_compatibility|Different Interpreters Compatibility]]).  Rubygems have a facility to ship different versions of the code in the same gem so that the gem can run on all versions of the interpreter so we only need to have one common directory for rubygems that all the interpreters can use.
 +
 
 +
The standard ruby <code>%{vendorlib}</code> directories lack this facility.  For this reason, non-gem libraries need to be placed in per-interpreter directories and must have a separate subpackage (or package depending on upstream) for each interpreter that they support.
 +
 
 +
== Libraries ==
 +
 
 +
These guidelines only apply to Ruby packages whose main purpose is providing a Ruby library; packages that mainly provide user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby must follow the [[#ruby_applications|ruby applications guidelines]] instead.
 +
 
 +
=== RubyGems ===
 +
 
 +
[http://www.rubygems.org/ RubyGems]  are Ruby's own packaging format. Gems contain a lot of the same metadata that RPM's need, making fairly smooth interoperation between RPM and Gems possible. This guideline ensures that Gems are packaged as RPM's in a way that such RPM's fit cleanly with the rest of the distribution and to make it possible for the end user to satisfy dependencies of a Gem by installing the appropriate RPM-packaged Gem.
 +
 
 +
Both RPM's and Gems use similar terminology --- there are specfiles, package names, dependencies etc. for both. To keep confusion to a minimum, terms relating to Gem concepts will be explicitly refereed to with the word 'Gem' prefixed, eg 'Gem specification' (.gemspec). An unqualified 'package' in the following always means an RPM.
 +
 
 +
* Spec files '''must''' contain a definition of <code>%{gem_name}</code> which is the name from the Gem's specification.
 +
* The <code>Source</code> of the package '''must''' be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package '''must''' be the Gem's version.
 +
* The package '''must''' <code>BuildRequires: rubygems-devel</code> to pull in the macros needed to build.
 +
* The package '''must''' <code>Requires: rubygems</code>, since it owns the RubyGems directory structure.
 +
 
 +
==== Building gems ====
 +
Since gems aren't a standard archive format that rpm knows about and they encapsulate both an archive format and information to build the ruby library building an rpm from a gem looks a little different from other rpms.
  
The Ruby library files in a pure Ruby package '''must''' be placed into <code>Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] </code>. The specfile '''must''' get that path using
+
A sample spec for building gems would look like this:
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
%{!?ruby_sitelib: %global ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] ')}
+
%prep
 +
gem unpack %{SOURCE0}
 +
%setup -q -D -T -n  %{gem_name}-%{version}
 +
 
 +
gem spec %{SOURCE0} -l --ruby > %{gem_name}.gemspec
 +
 
 +
# Modify the gemspec if necessary with a patch or sed
 +
# Also apply patches to code if necessary
 +
%patch0 -p1
 +
 
 +
%build
 +
# Create the gem as gem install only works on a gem file
 +
gem build %{gem_name}.gemspec
 +
 
 +
# %%gem_install compiles any C extensions and installs the gem into ./%%gem_dir
 +
# by default, so that we can move it into the buildroot in %%install
 +
%gem_install
 +
 
 +
%install
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_dir}
 +
cp -a ./%{gem_dir}/* %{buildroot}%{gem_dir}/
 +
 
 +
# If there were programs installed:
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
 +
cp -a ./%{_bindir}/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
# If there are C extensions, mv them to the extdir.
 +
# You must replace REQUIRE_PATHS according to your gem specifics.
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/REQUIRE_PATHS
 +
mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/REQUIRE_PATHS/shared_object.so %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/REQUIRE_PATHS/
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
{{Template:Note}} For Fedora Core 3 and earlier releases, it is not possible to build noarch packages; for those releases, all Ruby packages '''must''' be architecture-specific, even if they only contain Ruby files. (See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184199 bug 184199] for details)
+
You should replace REQUIRE_PATHS with the first value of the require_paths field in the gemspec file.  It will typically be either "lib" or "ext".  For instance if you find following line in your gemspec file:
 +
<pre>
 +
  s.require_paths = ["lib"]
 +
</pre>
  
{{Anchor|ruby_sitearch}}
+
then the example above would look like:
 +
<pre>
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/lib
 +
mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/lib/shared_object.so %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/lib/
 +
</pre>
  
=== Ruby packages with binary content/shared libraries ===
+
===== %prep =====
 +
Since gems aren't an archive format that rpm recognizes, the first thing we have to do is explicitly use <code>gem unpack</code> to extract the source from the gem.  Then we call <code>%setup -n %{gem_name}-%{version}</code> to tell rpm what the directory the gem has unpacked into.  The [http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-SETUP-T-OPTION <code>-T</code>] and [http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-SETUP-D-OPTION <code>-D</code>] flags tell <code>%setup</code> that we've already unpacked the code
  
For packages with binary content, e.g., database drivers or any other Ruby bindings to C libraries, the package '''must''' be architecture specific.
+
We then run <code>gem spec</code> to output the metadata from the gem into a file. This <code>.gemspec</code> file will be used to rebuild the gem later.  If we need to modify the <code>.gemspec</code> (for instance, if the version of dependencies is wrong for Fedora or the <code>.gemspec</code> is using old, no longer supported fields) we would do it here.  Patches to the code itself can also be done here.
 +
 
 +
===== %build =====
 +
Next we build the gem. Because <code>%gem_install</code> only operates on gem archives, we next recreate the gem with <code>gem build</code>. The gem file that is created is then used by <code>%gem_install</code> to build and install the code into the temporary directory, which is <code>./%{gem_dir}</code> by default. We do this because the <code>%gem_install</code> command both builds and installs the code in one step so we need to have a temporary directory to place the built sources before installing them in <code>%install</code> section.
 +
 
 +
<code>%gem_install</code> macro accepts two additional options:
 +
;<code>-n <gem_file></code>
 +
:Allows to override gem used for installation. This might get useful for converting legacy spec, so you might specify %{SOURCE0} as a gem for installation.
 +
;<code>-d <install_dir></code>
 +
:Might override the gem installation destination. However we do not suggest to use this option.
 +
 
 +
{{admon/note||The %gem_install macro '''must not''' be used to install into the <code>%{buildroot}</code>}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===== %install =====
 +
Here we actually install into the <code>%{buildroot}</code>.  We create the directories that we need and then copy what was installed into the temporary directories into the <code>%{buildroot}</code> hierarchy.  Finally, if this ruby gem creates shared objects the shared objects are moved into the arch specific <code>%{gem_extdir_mri}</code> path.
 +
 
 +
==== Patching required gem versions ====
 +
One common patching need is to change overly strict version requirements in the upstream gemspec.  This may be because upstream's gemspec only mentions versions that they've explicitly tested against but we know that a different version will also work or because we know that the packages we ship have applied fixes for problematic behaviour without bumping the version number (for instance, backported fixes).  To fix these issues, find the <code>add_runtime_dependency</code> call in the gemspec and patch it with the corrected version similar to this:
  
The binary files in a Ruby package with binary content '''must''' be placed into <code>Config::CONFIG["sitearchdir"] </code>. The Ruby files in such a package '''should''' be placed into that directory, too. The specfile '''must''' get that path using
 
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
%{!?ruby_sitearch: %define ruby_sitearch %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitearchdir"] ')}
+
Gem::Specification.new do |s|
 +
  # [...]
 +
-  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<mail>, ["~> 2.2.19"])
 +
+  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<mail>, [">= 2.3.0"])
 +
  # [...]
 +
end
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
 +
{{admon/warning|Be sure to test|Do not simply change versions without testing that the new version works.  There are times the upstream is overly strict but there are also times when the version requirement was specified because a specific bug was encountered or the API changed in a minor release.}}
 +
 +
=== Packaging for Gem and non-Gem use ===
 +
 +
{{admon/caution|Packaging for non-Gem use is no longer needed| Originally, rubygem modules were not placed in ruby's library path, so we packaged rubygems for use with both gems and non-gems.  This allowed code that used <code>require('ARubyModulePackagedAsAGem');</code> to function.  The current <code>rubygem</code> module adds all gems to the ruby library path when it is <code>require</code>'d. So, packagers '''must not''' create non-Gem subpackages of rubygems for new packages. Since the majority of Ruby packages in Fedora are now packaged as installed gems, you may need to patch the code to use <code>require('rubygem')</code> as early in the program as possible to ensure that these ruby components are properly found.  Packages for ruby gems that currently create a non-gem subpackage should be adapted to stop shipping the non-gem subpackage (with a [[Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages | proper Obsoletes and Provides]] in the main rubygem package).}}
 +
 +
=== Non-Gem Packages ===
 +
 +
Non-Gem Ruby packages '''must''' require ruby-devel package at build time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby-devel</code>, and '''may''' indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building.
 +
 +
 +
==== Build Architecture and File Placement ====
 +
The following only affects the files that the package installs into <code>%{ruby_vendorarchdir} </code> and <code>%{ruby_vendorlibdir}</code> (the actual Ruby library files). All other files in a Ruby package must adhere to the general Fedora packaging conventions.
 +
 +
 +
{{admon/warning|Site versus Vendor|Previously, %{ruby_sitelibdir} and %{ruby_sitearchdir} were used. However, as they are meant only for local installations, please use <code>%{ruby_vendorlibdir}</code> and <code>%{ruby_vendorarchdir}</code> instead.}}
 +
 +
==== Pure Ruby packages ====
 +
Pure Ruby packages '''must''' be built as noarch packages.
 +
 +
The Ruby library files in a pure Ruby package '''must''' be placed into <code>%{ruby_vendorlibdir}</code> (or its proper subdirectory). The specfile '''must''' use this macro.
 +
 +
{{Anchor|ruby_vendorarchdir}}
 +
 +
==== Ruby packages with binary content/shared libraries ====
 +
 +
For packages with binary content, e.g., database drivers or any other Ruby bindings to C libraries, the package '''must''' be architecture specific.
 +
 +
The binary files in a Ruby package with binary content '''must''' be placed into <code>%{ruby_vendorarchdir}</code> (or its proper subdirectory). The Ruby files in such a package '''should''' be placed into %{ruby_vendorlibdir}. The specfile '''must''' use these macros.
  
 
For packages which create C shared libraries using <code>extconf.rb</code>
 
For packages which create C shared libraries using <code>extconf.rb</code>
 +
{{Anchor|configure_args}}
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
 
export CONFIGURE_ARGS="--with-cflags='%{optflags}'"
 
export CONFIGURE_ARGS="--with-cflags='%{optflags}'"
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
'''should''' be used to pass <code>CFLAGS</code> to <code>Makefile</code> correctly.
+
'''should''' be used to pass <code>CFLAGS</code> to <code>Makefile</code> correctly. Also, to place the files into the correct folders during build, pass <code>--vendor</code> to <code>extconf.rb</code> like this:
This also applies to Ruby Gems.
+
<pre>
 +
extconf.rb --vendor
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
{{Anchor|ruby_applications}}
  
== Ruby Gems ==
+
== Applications ==
  
[http://www.rubygems.org/ Ruby Gems]  are Ruby's own packaging format. Gems contain a lot of the same metadata that RPM's need, making fairly smooth interoperation between RPM and Gems possible. This guideline ensures that Gems are packaged as RPM's in a way that ensures (1) that such RPM's fit cleanly with the rest of the distribution and (2) make it possible for the end user to satisfy dependencies of a Gem by installing the appropriate RPM-packaged Gem.
+
Applications are
  
Both RPM's and Gems use similar terminology --- there's specfiles, package names, dependencies etc. for both. To keep confusion to a minimum, whenever the term from the Gem world is meant, it is explicitly called the 'Gem specification'. An unqualified 'package' in the following always means an RPM.
+
* programs that provide user-level tools or
 +
* web applications, typically built using Rails, Sinatra or similar frameworks.  
  
* Packages that contain Ruby Gems '''must''' be called <code>rubygem-%{gemname}</code> where <code>gemname</code> is the name from the Gem's specification.
+
The RPM packages '''must''' obey FHS rules. They should be installed into <code>%{_datadir}</code>. The following macro can help you:
* The <code>Source</code> of the package '''must''' be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package '''must''' be the Gem's version
+
* The package '''must''' have a <code>Requires</code> and a <code>BuildRequires</code> on <code>rubygems</code>
+
* The package '''must''' provide <code>rubygem(%{gemname})</code> where <code>gemname</code> is the name from the Gem's specification. For every dependency on a Gem named <code>gemdep</code>, the package must contain a <code>Requires</code> on <code>rubygem(%{gemdep})</code> with the same version constraints as the Gem
+
* The <code>%prep</code> and <code>%build</code> sections of the specfile '''should''' be empty.
+
* The Gem '''must''' be installed into <code>%{gemdir}</code> defined as
+
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
%define gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2>/dev/null)
+
%global app_root %{_datadir}/%{name}
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
The install '''should''' be performed with the command
+
 
 +
These packages typically have no "Provides" section, since no other libraries or applications depend on them.
 +
 
 +
Here's an abbreviated example:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
%global app_root %{_datadir}/%{name}
 +
 
 +
Summary: Deltacloud REST API
 +
Name: deltacloud-core
 +
Version: 0.3.0
 +
Release: 3%{?dist}
 +
Group: Development/Languages
 +
License: ASL 2.0 and MIT
 +
URL: http://incubator.apache.org/deltacloud
 +
Source0: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{name}-%{version}.gem
 +
Requires: rubygem-haml
 +
#...
 +
Requires(post):  chkconfig
 +
#...
 +
BuildRequires: rubygem-haml
 +
#...
 +
BuildArch: noarch
 +
 
 +
%description
 +
The Deltacloud API is built as a service-based REST API.
 +
You do not directly link a Deltacloud library into your program to use it.
 +
Instead, a client speaks the Deltacloud API over HTTP to a server
 +
which implements the REST interface.
 +
 
 +
%package doc
 +
Summary: Documentation for %{name}
 +
Group: Documentation
 +
Requires:%{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 +
 
 +
%description doc
 +
Documentation for %{name}
 +
 
 +
%prep
 +
gem unpack -V %{SOURCE0}
 +
%setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version}
 +
 
 +
%build
 +
 
 +
%install
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{app_root}
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initddir}
 +
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
 +
cp -r * %{buildroot}%{app_root}
 +
mv %{buildroot}%{app_root}/support/fedora/%{name} %{buildroot}%{_initddir}
 +
find %{buildroot}%{app_root}/lib -type f | xargs chmod -x
 +
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_initddir}/%{name}
 +
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{app_root}/bin/deltacloudd
 +
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{app_root}/support
 +
rdoc --op %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}
 +
 
 +
%post
 +
# This adds the proper /etc/rc*.d links for the script
 +
/sbin/chkconfig --add %{name}
 +
 
 +
%files
 +
%{_initddir}/%{name}
 +
%{_bindir}/deltacloudd
 +
%dir %{app_root}/
 +
%{app_root}/bin
 +
#...
 +
 
 +
%files doc
 +
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}
 +
%{app_root}/tests
 +
%{app_root}/%{name}.gemspec
 +
%{app_root}/Rakefile
 +
 
 +
%changelog
 +
#...
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
Note, that although the source is a RubyGem, we have to install the files manually under %{_datadir}/%{name}, %{_bindir}, etc. to follow FHS and general packaging guidelines.  If additional Fedora specific files (systemd <code>.service</code> files, configurations) are required, they '''should''' be
 +
* added via another <code>%SOURCE</code> tags
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0}
+
Source1: deltacloudd-fedora
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
* The package '''must''' own the following files and directories:
+
* placed into appropriate locations during <code>%install</code> stage
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
+
install -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/deltacloudd
%{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
+
%{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
+
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
* Architecture-specific content '''must not''' be installed into <code>%{gemdir}</code>
 
* If the Gem only contains pure Ruby code, it '''must''' be marked as <code>BuildArch: noarch</code>. If the Gem contains binary content (e.g., for a database driver), it '''must''' be marked as architecture specific, and all architecture specific content '''must''' be moved from the <code>%{gemdir}</code> to the [#ruby_sitearch <code>%{ruby_sitearch}</code> directory]  during <code>%install</code>
 
  
=== Ruby Gem with extension libraries written in C ===
+
== Running test suites ==
  
When a Ruby Gem contains extension libraries written in C,
+
If there is test suite available for the package (even separately, for example not included in the gem but available in the upstream repository), it '''should''' be run in <code>%check</code>. The test suite is the only automated tool which can assure basic functionality of the package.  Running it is especially helpful when mass rebuilds are required. You may skip test suite execution when not all build dependencies are met but this '''must''' be documented in the specfile. The missing build dependencies to enable the test suite should be packaged for Fedora as soon as possible and the test suite re-enabled.
* First, <code>%prep</code> stage '''must''' contain <code>%setup -q -c -T</code> to create the directory where C libraries are compiled.
+
 
* Then at %build stage the Ruby Gem '''must''' be installed under the directory created at %prep stage to get C libraries compiled under there.
+
The tests '''should not''' be run using Rake - Rake almost always draws in some unnecessary dependencies like hoe or gemcutter.
* When <code>gem install</code> is used to install Gem file, using <code>-V</code> option is '''recommend''' to check if <code>CFLAGS</code> is correctly honored.
+
 
* Finally at <code>%install</code> stage the whole tree under the directory created at %prep stage '''should''' be '''copied''' (not moved) to under <code>%{buildroot}%{gemdir}</code>.
+
{{admon/note|Do not ship tests|Normally tests are only run at package buildtime. They should not be included in the binary rpms that users install on their systems.  You may make an exception for this if the package makes public use of the test suite at runtime (for instance, an application package that has a <code>--selftest</code> command line switch that runs its testsuite.)}}
** When all tree under the directory created at %prep stage is moved to under <code>%{buildroot}</code>, <code>find_debuginfo.sh</code> will complain that the corresponding source files are missing.
+
 
* Installed C codes (usually under <code>%{geminstdir}/etc</code>) '''may''' be removed even if <code>gem contents %{gemname}</code> reports that installed C codes should be found there.
+
=== Testing With Different Ruby Implementations ===
 +
To run tests with different Ruby implementation such as JRuby, you need to <code>BuildRequires: jruby</code>. Then use Rubypick's interpreter switching:
  
==== Note ====
 
The current guideline
 
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
If the Gem contains binary content (e.g., for a database driver), it must be marked
+
testrb _jruby_ -Ilib test
as architecture specific, and all architecture specific content must be moved
+
from the %{gemdir} to the [#ruby_sitearch %{ruby_sitearch} directory] during %install
+
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
must still apply.
 
  
=== Packaging for Gem and non-Gem use ===
+
If your package is running unittests for ruby-mri and it is intended to run under alternate interpreters then it needs to run the unittests under all alternate interpreters as well.  This is the only method we have to check compatibility of the code under each interpreter.  The same rules apply that you can omit this if libraries you need are unavailable for a specific alternate interpreter but you must have a comment to explain.
  
If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and as a straight Ruby library without Gem support, it '''must''' be packaged as a Gem first. To make it available to code that does not use Ruby Gems, a subpackage called <code>ruby-%{gemname}</code> '''must''' be created in the <code>rubygem-%{gemname}</code> package such that
+
=== Testing frameworks usage ===
  
* The subpackage '''must''' require <code>rubygem(%gemname) = %version</code>
+
The Ruby community supports many testing frameworks. The following sections demonstrate how several to execute several of the more common test suites.
* The subpackage '''must''' provide <code>ruby(LIBRARY) = %version</code> where LIBRARY is the same as in the [#ruby_naming general Ruby guideline]  above.
+
 
* All the toplevel library files of the Gem must be symlinked into <code>ruby_sitelib</code>.
+
==== MiniTest ====
* The subpackage '''must''' own these symbolic links.
+
 
 +
MiniTest is the default testing framework shipped with Ruby. It is unbundled in Fedora (you must use <code>BuildRequires: rubygem-minitest</code>). To run tests using MiniTest you can use something like:
  
As an example, for <code>activesupport</code>, the <code>rubygem-activesupport</code> package would have a subpackge <code>ruby-activesupport</code>:
 
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
%package -n ruby-activesupport
+
%check
...
+
testrb -Ilib test
Requires: rubygem(activesupport) = %version
+
Provides: ruby(active_support) = %version  # The underscore is intentional, not a typo
+
...
+
%files -n ruby-activesupport
+
%{ruby_sitelib}/active_support
+
%{ruby_sitelib}/active_support.rb
+
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
=== Tips for Packagers ===
+
==== Test::UNIT ====
 +
 
 +
To run tests using Test::Unit you must <code>BuildRequires: rubygem-test-unit-</code> and use something like this:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
%check
 +
testrb2 -Ilib test
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
{{admon/note|| Test suites which run using Test::UNIT can typically also be executed by MiniTest. In that case, please prefer MiniTest.}}
 +
 
 +
==== RSpec ====
 +
 
 +
To run tests using RSpec >= 2 you must <code>BuildRequires: rubygem-rspec</code> and use something like:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
%check
 +
rspec -Ilib spec
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Test suites not included in the package ===
 +
 
 +
Sometimes you have to get the tests separately from upstream's gem package.  As an example lets suppose you're packaging <code>rubygem-delorean</code>, version 1.2.0, which is hosted on Github. Tests are not included in the Gem itself, so you need to get them and adjust the specfile accordingly:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
# git clone https://github.com/bebanjo/delorean.git && cd delorean
 +
# git checkout v1.2.0
 +
# tar -czf rubygem-delorean-1.2.0-specs.tgz spec/
 +
Source1: %{name}-%{version}-specs.tgz
 +
 
 +
# ...
 +
%prep
 +
%setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version}
 +
 
 +
tar -xzf %{SOURCE1}
 +
 
 +
# ...
 +
 
 +
%check
 +
cp -pr spec/ ./%{gem_instdir}
 +
pushd ./%{gem_instdir}
 +
# Run tests
 +
rm -rf spec
 +
popd
 +
 
 +
# ...
 +
 
 +
</pre>
 +
* Make sure to include the version of the tests in the source name, so that when updating to new version, rpmbuild will fail because it won't find the proper <code>%{SOURCE1}</code> (and this will remind you to update the tests, too).
 +
* Add the commands you used to get the tests into the specfile as comments. This will make it a lot easier the next time you will need to get them.
 +
* Run the tests as you normally would.
  
Gems carry a lot of metadata; [http://rubyforge.org/projects/gem2rpm/ gem2rpm] is a tool to generate an initial specfile and/or source RPM from a Gem. The generated specfile still needs some hand-editing, but conforms to 90% with this guideline.
+
[[Category:Packaging guidelines]]

Revision as of 21:26, 30 April 2013

Warning (medium size).png
Different guidelines for packages in RHEL and Fedora 16
In RHEL 5 and 6, a ruby version that does not have all the features needed to support these guidelines exists. If you're packaging for those distributions you should follow the old ruby guidelines instead.
Warning (medium size).png
Different Guidelines for Fedora 17 and 18
In Fedora 17 and 18 the ruby guidelines were slightly different. Some of the macros and practices listed here did not work. Please see this [earlier version of the guidelines] if you want your package to work on those versions of Fedora
Note.png
JRuby Gems
Although Fedora 19 has fully functioning JRuby integrated with system RubyGems, we have decided to not include the JRuby specific packaging guidelines here, as they need some more work. They will appear here as soon as we feel that we've got everything covered properly. You can contact us on Ruby-SIG mailing list in case of any questions about the prepared JRuby packaging guidelines.

There are three basic categories of ruby packages: ruby gems, non-gem ruby packages, and applications written in ruby. These guidelines contain sections common to all of these as well as sections which apply to each one individually. Be sure to read all the guidelines relevant to the type of ruby package you are building.

Contents

Ruby Compatibility

Each Ruby package must indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter. Use ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that:

Requires: ruby(release)

If the package requires Ruby of certain version(s), make the requirement versioned like this:

Requires: ruby(release) >= 1.9.1
Note.png
Alternate interpreters
Alternate Ruby interpreters (currently JRuby) also Provide: ruby(release). This implies, that pure RubyGems packages (these are shared among interpreters) should not have Requires: ruby or Requires: jruby to have their dependencies satisfied by any of these interpreters.
Warning (medium size).png
Over specified ruby(release) versioning
Please note, that if the ruby(release) version requirement is too specific, it may cause an unexpected interpreter to be drawn in. E.g. ruby(release) = 1.8 will require JRuby package, since it is the only package that provides it.

Different Interpreters Compatibility

Most of the pure Ruby packages will work on all Ruby interpreters. There are however cases, when the packages use interpreter-specific functions (like fork()) and won't run on other interpreters (JRuby). In this case, the package should require that interpreter. For example, a package that uses fork should explicitly specify Requires: ruby. In case of such package, packager should file a bug to ask upstream to provide support for other interpreter(s). This should be documented in specfile.

Shebang lines

On Fedora, /usr/bin/ruby is implemented via Rubypick. Rubypick is a tool similar to RVM or rbenv. It allows choosing interpreter to execute Ruby script. Rubypick routes anything executed via /usr/bin/ruby to /usr/bin/ruby-mri or /usr/bin/jruby. By default, it runs MRI (Matz's Ruby Implementation), but user can explicitly specify the interpreter by using _mri_ or _jruby_ as a first parameter. For example:

ruby _jruby_ jruby_script.rb
gem _mri_ install foo
rails _jruby_ s

Using the RUBYPICK environment variable can achieve the same results. The environment variable can be used to set one interpreter as the global default:

export RUBYPICK=_jruby_
ruby jruby_script.rb  # Will use jruby
gem install foo        # Will also use jruby

Ruby executables that are known to only run on one Ruby implementation should use that specific implementation in their shebang - #!/usr/bin/ruby-mri or #!/usr/bin/jruby to ensure that they run using that implementation. All other code should use #!/usr/bin/ruby.

Naming Guidelines

  • Packages that contain Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gem_name}.
  • The name of a ruby extension/library package must start with the interpreter it is built for (ruby, jruby, etc) and then the UPSTREAM name. For example: ruby-UPSTREAM. If the upstream name UPSTREAM contains ruby, that should be dropped from the name. For example, the SQLite database driver for ruby is called sqlite3-ruby. The corresponding Fedora package should be called ruby-sqlite3, and not ruby-sqlite3-ruby.
  • Application packages that mainly provide user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby must follow the general NamingGuidelines instead.

Macros

Non-gem ruby packages and ruby gem packages install to certain standard locations. The ruby-devel and rubygems-devel packages contain macros useful for the respective package types. Alternate ruby interpreters will have equivalent locations (To be added to this table later)

Macro Expanded path Usage
From ruby-devel; intended for non-gem packages.
%{ruby_vendorarchdir} /usr/lib{64}/ruby/vendor_ruby Place for architecture specific (e.g. *.so) files.
%{ruby_vendorlibdir} /usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby Place for architecture independent (e.g. *.rb) files.
%{ruby_sitearchdir} /usr/local/lib{64}/ruby/site_ruby Place for local architecture specific (e.g. *.so) files.
%{ruby_sitelibdir} /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby Place for local architecture independent (e.g. *.rb) files.
From rubygems-devel; intended for gem packages
%{gem_dir} /usr/share/gems Top directory for the Gem structure.
%{gem_instdir} %{gem_dir}/gems/%{gem_name}-%{version} Directory with the actual content of the Gem.
%{gem_libdir} %{gem_instdir}/lib The lib folder of the Gem.
%{gem_cache} %{gem_dir}/cache/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem The cached Gem.
%{gem_spec} %{gem_dir}/specifications/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gemspec The Gem specification file.
%{gem_docdir} %{gem_dir}/doc/%{gem_name}-%{version} The rdoc documentation of the Gem.
%{gem_extdir_mri} %{_libdir}/gems/ruby/%{gem_name}-%{version} The directory for MRI Ruby Gem extensions.

Interpreter independence and directory macros

You may have noticed that the table above has different directories for non-gem libraries on different ruby interpreters but only a single set of directories for rubygem libraries. This is because code written for one ruby interpreter will often run on all ruby interpreters that Fedora ships (ruby, jruby, etc). However, some code uses methods that are not available on all interpreters (see Different Interpreters Compatibility). Rubygems have a facility to ship different versions of the code in the same gem so that the gem can run on all versions of the interpreter so we only need to have one common directory for rubygems that all the interpreters can use.

The standard ruby %{vendorlib} directories lack this facility. For this reason, non-gem libraries need to be placed in per-interpreter directories and must have a separate subpackage (or package depending on upstream) for each interpreter that they support.

Libraries

These guidelines only apply to Ruby packages whose main purpose is providing a Ruby library; packages that mainly provide user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby must follow the ruby applications guidelines instead.

RubyGems

RubyGems are Ruby's own packaging format. Gems contain a lot of the same metadata that RPM's need, making fairly smooth interoperation between RPM and Gems possible. This guideline ensures that Gems are packaged as RPM's in a way that such RPM's fit cleanly with the rest of the distribution and to make it possible for the end user to satisfy dependencies of a Gem by installing the appropriate RPM-packaged Gem.

Both RPM's and Gems use similar terminology --- there are specfiles, package names, dependencies etc. for both. To keep confusion to a minimum, terms relating to Gem concepts will be explicitly refereed to with the word 'Gem' prefixed, eg 'Gem specification' (.gemspec). An unqualified 'package' in the following always means an RPM.

  • Spec files must contain a definition of %{gem_name} which is the name from the Gem's specification.
  • The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version.
  • The package must BuildRequires: rubygems-devel to pull in the macros needed to build.
  • The package must Requires: rubygems, since it owns the RubyGems directory structure.

Building gems

Since gems aren't a standard archive format that rpm knows about and they encapsulate both an archive format and information to build the ruby library building an rpm from a gem looks a little different from other rpms.

A sample spec for building gems would look like this:

%prep
gem unpack %{SOURCE0}
%setup -q -D -T -n  %{gem_name}-%{version}

gem spec %{SOURCE0} -l --ruby > %{gem_name}.gemspec

# Modify the gemspec if necessary with a patch or sed
# Also apply patches to code if necessary
%patch0 -p1

%build
# Create the gem as gem install only works on a gem file
gem build %{gem_name}.gemspec

# %%gem_install compiles any C extensions and installs the gem into ./%%gem_dir
# by default, so that we can move it into the buildroot in %%install
%gem_install

%install
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_dir}
cp -a ./%{gem_dir}/* %{buildroot}%{gem_dir}/

# If there were programs installed:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
cp -a ./%{_bindir}/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir}


# If there are C extensions, mv them to the extdir.
# You must replace REQUIRE_PATHS according to your gem specifics.
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/REQUIRE_PATHS
mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/REQUIRE_PATHS/shared_object.so %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/REQUIRE_PATHS/

You should replace REQUIRE_PATHS with the first value of the require_paths field in the gemspec file. It will typically be either "lib" or "ext". For instance if you find following line in your gemspec file:

   s.require_paths = ["lib"]

then the example above would look like:

mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/lib
mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/lib/shared_object.so %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/lib/
 %prep

Since gems aren't an archive format that rpm recognizes, the first thing we have to do is explicitly use gem unpack to extract the source from the gem. Then we call %setup -n %{gem_name}-%{version} to tell rpm what the directory the gem has unpacked into. The -T and -D flags tell %setup that we've already unpacked the code

We then run gem spec to output the metadata from the gem into a file. This .gemspec file will be used to rebuild the gem later. If we need to modify the .gemspec (for instance, if the version of dependencies is wrong for Fedora or the .gemspec is using old, no longer supported fields) we would do it here. Patches to the code itself can also be done here.

 %build

Next we build the gem. Because %gem_install only operates on gem archives, we next recreate the gem with gem build. The gem file that is created is then used by %gem_install to build and install the code into the temporary directory, which is ./%{gem_dir} by default. We do this because the %gem_install command both builds and installs the code in one step so we need to have a temporary directory to place the built sources before installing them in %install section.

%gem_install macro accepts two additional options:

-n <gem_file>
Allows to override gem used for installation. This might get useful for converting legacy spec, so you might specify %{SOURCE0} as a gem for installation.
-d <install_dir>
Might override the gem installation destination. However we do not suggest to use this option.
Note.png
The %gem_install macro must not be used to install into the %{buildroot}


 %install

Here we actually install into the %{buildroot}. We create the directories that we need and then copy what was installed into the temporary directories into the %{buildroot} hierarchy. Finally, if this ruby gem creates shared objects the shared objects are moved into the arch specific %{gem_extdir_mri} path.

Patching required gem versions

One common patching need is to change overly strict version requirements in the upstream gemspec. This may be because upstream's gemspec only mentions versions that they've explicitly tested against but we know that a different version will also work or because we know that the packages we ship have applied fixes for problematic behaviour without bumping the version number (for instance, backported fixes). To fix these issues, find the add_runtime_dependency call in the gemspec and patch it with the corrected version similar to this:

Gem::Specification.new do |s|
  # [...]
-  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<mail>, ["~> 2.2.19"])
+  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<mail>, [">= 2.3.0"])
  # [...]
end
Warning (medium size).png
Be sure to test
Do not simply change versions without testing that the new version works. There are times the upstream is overly strict but there are also times when the version requirement was specified because a specific bug was encountered or the API changed in a minor release.

Packaging for Gem and non-Gem use

Stop (medium size).png
Packaging for non-Gem use is no longer needed
Originally, rubygem modules were not placed in ruby's library path, so we packaged rubygems for use with both gems and non-gems. This allowed code that used require('ARubyModulePackagedAsAGem'); to function. The current rubygem module adds all gems to the ruby library path when it is require'd. So, packagers must not create non-Gem subpackages of rubygems for new packages. Since the majority of Ruby packages in Fedora are now packaged as installed gems, you may need to patch the code to use require('rubygem') as early in the program as possible to ensure that these ruby components are properly found. Packages for ruby gems that currently create a non-gem subpackage should be adapted to stop shipping the non-gem subpackage (with a proper Obsoletes and Provides in the main rubygem package).

Non-Gem Packages

Non-Gem Ruby packages must require ruby-devel package at build time with a BuildRequires: ruby-devel, and may indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building.


Build Architecture and File Placement

The following only affects the files that the package installs into %{ruby_vendorarchdir} and %{ruby_vendorlibdir} (the actual Ruby library files). All other files in a Ruby package must adhere to the general Fedora packaging conventions.


Warning (medium size).png
Site versus Vendor
Previously, %{ruby_sitelibdir} and %{ruby_sitearchdir} were used. However, as they are meant only for local installations, please use %{ruby_vendorlibdir} and %{ruby_vendorarchdir} instead.

Pure Ruby packages

Pure Ruby packages must be built as noarch packages.

The Ruby library files in a pure Ruby package must be placed into %{ruby_vendorlibdir} (or its proper subdirectory). The specfile must use this macro.

Ruby packages with binary content/shared libraries

For packages with binary content, e.g., database drivers or any other Ruby bindings to C libraries, the package must be architecture specific.

The binary files in a Ruby package with binary content must be placed into %{ruby_vendorarchdir} (or its proper subdirectory). The Ruby files in such a package should be placed into %{ruby_vendorlibdir}. The specfile must use these macros.

For packages which create C shared libraries using extconf.rb

export CONFIGURE_ARGS="--with-cflags='%{optflags}'"

should be used to pass CFLAGS to Makefile correctly. Also, to place the files into the correct folders during build, pass --vendor to extconf.rb like this:

extconf.rb --vendor

Applications

Applications are

  • programs that provide user-level tools or
  • web applications, typically built using Rails, Sinatra or similar frameworks.

The RPM packages must obey FHS rules. They should be installed into %{_datadir}. The following macro can help you:

%global app_root %{_datadir}/%{name}

These packages typically have no "Provides" section, since no other libraries or applications depend on them.

Here's an abbreviated example:

%global app_root %{_datadir}/%{name}

Summary: Deltacloud REST API
Name: deltacloud-core
Version: 0.3.0
Release: 3%{?dist}
Group: Development/Languages
License: ASL 2.0 and MIT
URL: http://incubator.apache.org/deltacloud
Source0: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{name}-%{version}.gem
Requires: rubygem-haml
#...
Requires(post):   chkconfig
#...
BuildRequires: rubygem-haml
#...
BuildArch: noarch

%description
The Deltacloud API is built as a service-based REST API.
You do not directly link a Deltacloud library into your program to use it.
Instead, a client speaks the Deltacloud API over HTTP to a server
which implements the REST interface.

%package doc
Summary: Documentation for %{name}
Group: Documentation
Requires:%{name} = %{version}-%{release}

%description doc
Documentation for %{name}

%prep
gem unpack -V %{SOURCE0}
%setup -q -D -T -n %{name}-%{version}

%build

%install
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{app_root}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initddir}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
cp -r * %{buildroot}%{app_root}
mv %{buildroot}%{app_root}/support/fedora/%{name} %{buildroot}%{_initddir}
find %{buildroot}%{app_root}/lib -type f | xargs chmod -x
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_initddir}/%{name}
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{app_root}/bin/deltacloudd
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{app_root}/support
rdoc --op %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}

%post
# This adds the proper /etc/rc*.d links for the script
/sbin/chkconfig --add %{name}

%files
%{_initddir}/%{name}
%{_bindir}/deltacloudd
%dir %{app_root}/
%{app_root}/bin
#...

%files doc
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}
%{app_root}/tests
%{app_root}/%{name}.gemspec
%{app_root}/Rakefile

%changelog
#...

Note, that although the source is a RubyGem, we have to install the files manually under %{_datadir}/%{name}, %{_bindir}, etc. to follow FHS and general packaging guidelines. If additional Fedora specific files (systemd .service files, configurations) are required, they should be

  • added via another %SOURCE tags
Source1: deltacloudd-fedora
  • placed into appropriate locations during %install stage
install -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/deltacloudd

Running test suites

If there is test suite available for the package (even separately, for example not included in the gem but available in the upstream repository), it should be run in %check. The test suite is the only automated tool which can assure basic functionality of the package. Running it is especially helpful when mass rebuilds are required. You may skip test suite execution when not all build dependencies are met but this must be documented in the specfile. The missing build dependencies to enable the test suite should be packaged for Fedora as soon as possible and the test suite re-enabled.

The tests should not be run using Rake - Rake almost always draws in some unnecessary dependencies like hoe or gemcutter.

Note.png
Do not ship tests
Normally tests are only run at package buildtime. They should not be included in the binary rpms that users install on their systems. You may make an exception for this if the package makes public use of the test suite at runtime (for instance, an application package that has a --selftest command line switch that runs its testsuite.)

Testing With Different Ruby Implementations

To run tests with different Ruby implementation such as JRuby, you need to BuildRequires: jruby. Then use Rubypick's interpreter switching:

testrb _jruby_ -Ilib test

If your package is running unittests for ruby-mri and it is intended to run under alternate interpreters then it needs to run the unittests under all alternate interpreters as well. This is the only method we have to check compatibility of the code under each interpreter. The same rules apply that you can omit this if libraries you need are unavailable for a specific alternate interpreter but you must have a comment to explain.

Testing frameworks usage

The Ruby community supports many testing frameworks. The following sections demonstrate how several to execute several of the more common test suites.

MiniTest

MiniTest is the default testing framework shipped with Ruby. It is unbundled in Fedora (you must use BuildRequires: rubygem-minitest). To run tests using MiniTest you can use something like:

%check
testrb -Ilib test

Test::UNIT

To run tests using Test::Unit you must BuildRequires: rubygem-test-unit- and use something like this:

%check
testrb2 -Ilib test
Note.png
Test suites which run using Test::UNIT can typically also be executed by MiniTest. In that case, please prefer MiniTest.

RSpec

To run tests using RSpec >= 2 you must BuildRequires: rubygem-rspec and use something like:

%check
rspec -Ilib spec


Test suites not included in the package

Sometimes you have to get the tests separately from upstream's gem package. As an example lets suppose you're packaging rubygem-delorean, version 1.2.0, which is hosted on Github. Tests are not included in the Gem itself, so you need to get them and adjust the specfile accordingly:

# git clone https://github.com/bebanjo/delorean.git && cd delorean
# git checkout v1.2.0
# tar -czf rubygem-delorean-1.2.0-specs.tgz spec/
Source1: %{name}-%{version}-specs.tgz

# ...
%prep
%setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version}

tar -xzf %{SOURCE1}

# ...

%check
cp -pr spec/ ./%{gem_instdir}
pushd ./%{gem_instdir}
# Run tests
rm -rf spec
popd

# ...

  • Make sure to include the version of the tests in the source name, so that when updating to new version, rpmbuild will fail because it won't find the proper %{SOURCE1} (and this will remind you to update the tests, too).
  • Add the commands you used to get the tests into the specfile as comments. This will make it a lot easier the next time you will need to get them.
  • Run the tests as you normally would.