Packaging talk:NamingGuidelines
From FedoraProject
m (Talk:Packaging/NamingGuidelines moved to Packaging talk:NamingGuidelines: Moving Packaging Pages to Packaging Namespace) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* : Note that Epoch: has been dropped here, but preserved in Provides/Obsoletes below | * : Note that Epoch: has been dropped here, but preserved in Provides/Obsoletes below | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Clarification request === | ||
| + | " Snapshot packages | ||
| + | |||
| + | If a snapshot package is considered a "pre-release package", you should follow the guidelines listed in Pre-Release Packages , and use an %{alphatag} beginning with the date in YYYYMMDD format and followed by up to 16 (ASCII) alphanumeric characters of your choosing." | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there a minimum number of alphatag chars ? | ||
| + | Would 2 be a good minimum eg: fits hg | ||
| + | |||
| + | Suggest change to: | ||
| + | "followed by between 2 and 16 (ASCII) alphanumeric characters of your choosing." | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 31 December 2008
The following metadata was found in MoinMoin that could not be converted
to a useful value in MediaWiki:
- : Note that Epoch: has been dropped here, but preserved in Provides/Obsoletes below
Clarification request
" Snapshot packages
If a snapshot package is considered a "pre-release package", you should follow the guidelines listed in Pre-Release Packages , and use an %{alphatag} beginning with the date in YYYYMMDD format and followed by up to 16 (ASCII) alphanumeric characters of your choosing."
Is there a minimum number of alphatag chars ? Would 2 be a good minimum eg: fits hg
Suggest change to: "followed by between 2 and 16 (ASCII) alphanumeric characters of your choosing."