From Fedora Project Wiki

< QA‎ | Meetings

Revision as of 15:50, 23 May 2011 by Jlaska (talk | contribs) (Updated notes)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Attendees

People present (lines said):

  1. jlaska (117)
  2. j_dulaney (48)
  3. kparal (24)
  4. tflink (16)
  5. maxamillion (10)
  6. pbrobinson (8)
  7. vhumpa (8)
  8. elad661 (6)
  9. Southern_Gentlem (1)

Unable to attend:

  1. Rhe (hopefully sleeping)
  2. Hongqing (hopefully sleeping)
  3. wutao85 (hopefully sleeping)
  4. AdamWill
  5. jskladan

Agenda

Previous meeting follow-up

F-15 preparations

AutoQA update

  • Worked on thoe AutoQA plaintext pretty logs (see example links)
  • Plan to re-evaluate release next week - keeping with our 2 week evaluation schedule
  • First-pass at spam-reduction code almost complete, tflink hoping to push and open for comments later today
  • jskladan today posted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ResultsDB_Overview
  • ETA for autoqa hardware changes (staging and production server relocation and new network) ~ early June 2011

Upcoming QA events

  1. Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release

Open Discussion - <your topic here>

Fedora 15 - Sugar and NM-0.9

  • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697649
  • j_dulaney + tflink asked if there were any updates on the Sugar status for F15
  • j_dulaney has a tested patch and will post to bz for review later today
  • pbrobinson plans review and apply patch and build a live image for additional testing

Action items

IRC Log

jlaska #startmeeting Fedora QA Meeting 15:00
zodbot Meeting started Mon May 23 15:00:01 2011 UTC. The chair is jlaska. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00
zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00
jlaska #meetingname fedora-qa 15:00
zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 15:00
jlaska #topic Roll Call... 15:00
jlaska brunowolff: noted he has a conflict with the timeslot today, and will review the minutes later on 15:00
* tflink is present 15:00
jlaska adamw is on holiday today - We wish him a Happy Victoria Day 15:00
* kparal is not on holiday 15:00
jlaska heh ... a QA meeting is like a holiday, right? :) 15:01
kparal :) 15:01
* vhumpa has just arrived 15:01
jlaska tflink: kparal: hello gents 15:01
* j_dulaney is here 15:01
* jlaska tips hat to vhumpa 15:01
* elad661 is here 15:01
jlaska howdy j_dulaney and elad661 15:01
j_dulaney jlaska 15:01
* jlaska waits another minute or so ... 15:02
* j_dulaney puts on some Jefferson Airplane 15:02
jlaska hmm who else am I missing ... 15:02
jlaska Viking-Ice? 15:02
kparal I think jskladan is just doing some school exam 15:03
jlaska yes, Joza! 15:03
jlaska kparal: thanks, ugh, exams ... poor guy 15:03
jlaska okay, let's get moving ... 15:03
jlaska #topic Previous Meeting Follow-up 15:03
jlaska This is pretty easy ... since I have no action items from last week 15:03
jlaska anything I failed to capture that folks wanted to update the team on? 15:04
j_dulaney Armadillos? 15:04
* j_dulaney should be ignored 15:04
jlaska alright then ... let's dive in 15:04
jlaska the agenda is intentionally light today ... 15:05
jlaska so feel free to raise anything during open-discussion 15:05
jlaska #topic F-15 release preparations 15:05
jlaska #info As you no doubt have heard, F-15-RC3 was declared the winner - http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-05-17/fedora_15_go_or_no_go_meeting.2011-05-17-21.00.html 15:06
jlaska and will be released tomorrow as Fedora 15 15:06
jlaska <insert applause and cheering here> 15:06
* kparal cheers 15:06
* j_dulaney cheers 15:06
* j_dulaney is being stared at by the folks around him 15:06
jlaska these releases just keep coming :) 15:06
tflink I think of that as a good thing. If they stopped, I'd be worried 15:07
Southern_Gentlem on to the next which is right around the corner 15:07
jlaska but seriously, kudos to all involved in testing, bug filing or active discussion on the test@lists.fp.org 15:07
jlaska Southern_Gentlem: heh ... yeah, our most important release yet! :D 15:07
jlaska before we move on ... please gaze at the hotdog -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers 15:07
j_dulaney With mustard! 15:08
* j_dulaney is reminded of something he needs to bring up for open discussion 15:08
vhumpa just NTHs left as it should be 15:08
jlaska so with Fedora 15 going live tomorrow ... the only outstanding items needed from us are staying on top of common issues 15:08
jlaska vhumpa: you got it! 15:08
jlaska #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F15_bugs 15:08
jlaska as usual, adamw already started documenting some of the issues tagged for CommonBugs 15:09
jlaska I'll do a quick sweep after the meeting to document some installer and upgrade issues 15:09
jlaska Anyone can get involved if they want to help, or to document a known issue close to them ... the procedure is documented on the common bug page 15:09
j_dulaney maxamillion 15:10
jlaska #info Document remaining 'known issues' - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F15_bugs 15:10
maxamillion j_dulaney: hi hi :) 15:10
jlaska lastly ... as Southern_Gentlem hinted ... 15:10
* maxamillion is late but here-ish 15:10
jlaska maxamillion: fashionably late! 15:10
jlaska :) 15:10
jlaska Please start thinking about what you'd like to do for Fedora 16 15:11
maxamillion jlaska: other than take over the world? 15:11
jlaska #info Make notes/ideas/requests on the F15 retrospective page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_QA_Retrospective 15:11
jlaska maxamillion: that's always the goal :) 15:11
maxamillion lol 15:11
j_dulaney Target: The World 15:11
jlaska we have a good list of items to address for F16 already, but it's always nice to have more input 15:11
jlaska As usual, the F15 retrospective will become F16 fedora-qa TRAC tickets to work on 15:12
maxamillion semi-random question, but does anyone have the sha256 checksum of the F15 desktop live release x86_64 image? 15:12
jlaska Anyone is welcome to work on topics already raised on the wiki, or contribute new ideas 15:12
kparal maxamillion: e4007d98d9338419d79fab5d5deb9fcd477117a604d37f89f622141f3d0fa60e 15:13
jlaska thanks kparal 15:13
maxamillion kparal: awesome! you 15:13
maxamillion kparal: awesome! you're a saint and a scholar* 15:13
jlaska Any other thoughts on F15 before we move on? 15:14
jlaska haha 15:14
j_dulaney I think it went better than F14 15:14
maxamillion jlaska: it kicks hind parts on my laptop at the house :) .... some troubles with my older gear but over all I call it a net good 15:14
j_dulaney It always seems the odd number releases go smoother 15:14
jlaska congrats to tflink and vhumpa for surviving their first releases 15:14
j_dulaney LOL 15:14
jlaska maxamillion: yeah, I know you've been finding issues recently :( 15:14
vhumpa There is still a day and you never now crossing streets ... :) 15:15
jlaska vhumpa: true ... pre-congrats :) 15:15
tflink vhumpa: don't say that, now I'm going to be paranoid for the rest of the day 15:15
* tflink hides under his desk 15:15
elad661 I had some trouble with F15 lately when I installed it on a server, one of those was due to a bug in comps which I already fixed :) 15:15
jlaska well ... I can guarruntee bugs will come that we didn't find 15:15
* j_dulaney goes looking for bugs with flyswatter in hand 15:16
jlaska let's do our best to understand the failures ... and document what we think could be done differently on the retrospective 15:16
jlaska elad661: a dep/conflict issue? 15:16
elad661 jlaska: missing firmware 15:16
jlaska elad661: oh oh, gotcha 15:16
elad661 other than that f15 was the smoothest release yet 15:17
jlaska elad661: if you have wood nearby, please knock it 15:17
jlaska :) 15:17
* j_dulaney still has nouveau issues, but better than F14 15:17
maxamillion jlaska: I don't necessarily know that I found any "failures" in terms of QA ... I just think I ran into issues with hardware that's older and likely wasn't used in other testings .... and I joined the testing efforts a little late because the semester just ended a couple weeks ago 15:17
maxamillion yeah, I think all in all it will be a solid release 15:17
jlaska maxamillion: yeah, that makes sense 15:18
* j_dulaney also joined in late due to family issues and tornados 15:18
jlaska alright ... so let's move on and give the AutoQA rock stars some time ... 15:18
jlaska #topic AutoQA Update 15:18
jlaska who wants to start it off ... kparal? 15:18
kparal yep 15:18
kparal I don't really have much, it will be quicker than ever 15:18
kparal for the full week we worked on those plaintext pretty logs that we promised 15:19
kparal currently it looks like this: 15:19
kparal #link http://fpaste.org/sExW/ 15:19
kparal #link http://fpaste.org/I7O0/ 15:19
* jlaska clicks 15:19
elad661 wow! awesome! 15:19
jlaska cool, an update example with multiple builds 15:19
kparal the code is in origin/pretty branch and I hope it will be ready and merged into master this week 15:19
vhumpa kparal: Nice to see there it merged well 15:20
* j_dulaney likes 15:20
elad661 it makes AutoQA much more readable 15:20
kparal especially more user-friendly 15:20
kparal and that's basically all updates I had 15:21
j_dulaney Are more test result going to go into the pretty log? 15:21
kparal j_dulaney: all tests should have pretty logs. currently that means depcheck and upgradepath 15:21
j_dulaney I'm wondering if any fails should show up there, but otherwise maybe don't include all the passes? 15:21
j_dulaney kparal: Ah 15:21
vhumpa j_dulaney: for future it has also been designed so that any test could use it 15:21
j_dulaney Indeed 15:22
tflink j_dulaney: we're planning to keep all the passes in the logs - email reduction is a separate task 15:22
kparal j_dulaney: yes, failures will be there as well, see the second link 15:22
j_dulaney Right 15:22
tflink j_dulaney: I assume that's what you were talking about 15:22
j_dulaney tflink: Indeed 15:22
jlaska #info Worked on thoe AutoQA plaintext pretty logs (see example links) 15:23
jlaska I'm sure one of you is already thinking about this ... but I gather we should follow-up to devel@ with the release announcment 15:24
jlaska s/one/all/ 15:24
kparal now you mean... AutoQA release or Fedora release? 15:24
jlaska AutoQA 15:25
kparal when the release is ready I'll definitely write up some announcement and post it everywhere :) 15:26
jlaska heh, yeah I figured ... that seems to have become part of the unofficial release process 15:26
tflink we'll re-evaluate release next week - keeping with our 2 week evaluation schedule 15:26
jlaska anything else to highlight for AutoQA? 15:26
kparal not from me 15:27
jlaska #info Plan to re-evaluate release next week - keeping with our 2 week evaluation schedule 15:27
vhumpa looks like that is when 0.5.0 could be hitting the shelves 15:27
jlaska looks like jskladan has been doing some documentation for resultsdb ... I suspect he'll have some updates on that next week (or later) 15:27
tflink I have the first pass at the spam-reduction code almost done. I'm hoping to push and get comments later today now that my internet connection has stopped disconnecting every 45-60 minutes 15:28
* j_dulaney would like to look at that. 15:28
j_dulaney The code, not the internet issues 15:28
kparal j_dulaney: jskladan today posted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ResultsDB_Overview 15:28
kparal I didn't have time to look at that yet 15:28
* tflink was hoping you were offering to look at the wiring :( 15:28
j_dulaney kparal: Right 15:28
jlaska #info First-pass at spam-reduction code almost complete, tflink hoping to push and open for comments later today 15:28
jlaska #info jskladan today posted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ResultsDB_Overview 15:29
j_dulaney tflink: I might could if I was there (I have my electrician's license in NC) 15:29
* vhumpa appologizes that he will be little busy with state exam studies following 4 weeks - but will definitely stay in the loop and work on autoqa as much as he can afford 15:30
jlaska So it sounds like this will be another busy AutoQA week ... heads down, cranking out content for the upcoming release 15:30
kparal something like that 15:31
jlaska I have an update on the staging server hardware ... the RHT networking request has been completed. Smooge gave an early estimate for ~ early June to have the hardware re-racked and online in the new network 15:31
jlaska Of course ... I'll provide an update if I hear anything else 15:31
kparal nice 15:32
jlaska #info ETA for autoqa hardware changes (staging and production server relocation) - ~ early June 2011 15:32
* tflink is looking forward to having a real staging environment 15:32
jlaska I'm looking forward to more disk space in our production instance! :D 15:32
tflink yeah, that would be better than staging 15:33
jlaska so ... stay tuned 15:33
jlaska okay, I guess we can move on 15:33
* j_dulaney wonders if HD donations are accepted 15:33
jlaska thanks kparal, tflink and vhumpa for the updates 15:33
kparal you're welcome 15:33
j_dulaney I have a box full of blank 500 GB SATA drives 15:33
jlaska j_dulaney: hmm, I don't know how that would work with the existing space in the lab ... I (or you) can talk to smooge about that 15:34
j_dulaney Righteo 15:34
jlaska #topic Upcoming QA events 15:34
vhumpa j_dulaney: nice one :) 15:34
jlaska kind of a moot point ... but this will be the last time for this topic in F15 15:34
j_dulaney From a former employer when he passes away 15:34
jlaska #info Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release 15:34
jlaska #topic Open Discussion - <your topic here> 15:35
j_dulaney i/passes/passed 15:35
jlaska okay ... what haven't we discussed that folks would like bring up for discussion in this meeting 15:35
j_dulaney Sugar 15:35
tflink yeah, have there been any updates on the NM situation? 15:35
j_dulaney Specifically, Sugar NM 0.9 15:35
jlaska the NM Sugar situation? 15:35
j_dulaney I've sent a patch to pbrobinson 15:35
jlaska #topic Fedora 15 - Sugar and NM-0.9 15:35
jlaska #info j_dulaney + tflink asked if there were any updates on the Sugar status for F15 15:36
jlaska I don't know ... I haven't been closely following the issue 15:36
j_dulaney It took a while because I knew nothing about sugar 15:36
j_dulaney But, I got a working kluge going. 15:36
jlaska I know adamw was in touch with probinson, but I don't have the latest 15:36
jlaska anyone have the bz handy on this? 15:36
* j_dulaney does 15:37
j_dulaney It works on my machine; hopefully pbrobinson will push my patch shortly 15:37
j_dulaney Testing would be welcome 15:37
tflink j_dulaney: I'd be interested in testing that out 15:37
tflink .bug 697649 15:38
zodbot tflink: Bug 697649 Sugar Wireless Networking broken by NetworkManager 0.9 API - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697649 15:38
pbrobinson j_dulaney: YAY! I look forward to it, will be heading home in an hour or so and will test it there 15:38
jlaska tflink: thanks 15:38
j_dulaney tflink: email me and I'll email you the code directly 15:38
jlaska might want to post the patch for review into the bug also 15:38
j_dulaney Right 15:38
j_dulaney I'll do that post-meeting 15:38
jlaska and get in touch with peter directly (irc or email) 15:39
tflink j_dulaney: is your FAS account the same as your IRC nick? 15:39
jlaska to see what he needs to move forward with a build 15:39
pbrobinson j_dulaney: I'll do a scratch build of the rpm so people can tetst 15:39
j_dulaney jdulaney 15:39
pbrobinson test even 15:39
jlaska #info j_dulaney has a tested patch and will post to bz for review 15:39
jlaska pbrobinson: hey there 15:39
j_dulaney tflink: minus underscore 15:39
jlaska pbrobinson: anything else you want to note on this issue ... anything you are waiting for to proceed? 15:40
jlaska pbrobinson: will you be the one kicking off any builds once we have a tested working patch? 15:40
jlaska or will Simon Schampijer be handling that 15:40
pbrobinson jlaksa: I will be 15:40
jlaska pbrobinson: okay 15:41
jlaska getting a little ahead of myself here ... but assuming we have builds that work, what's the next step ... request updated .iso from rel-eng? 15:41
jlaska #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697649 15:41
pbrobinson jlaska: Once I've tested the patch I'll also generate a live image using it for testing to make sure I have everything else working, from there we should be good to go 15:42
jlaska pbrobinson: eggsellent :) 15:42
* jlaska twiddles fingers in a Burnsian manner 15:42
pbrobinson :-P 15:42
jlaska j_dulaney: tflink: pbrobinson: anything else you wanted to highlight on this topic? 15:43
* pbrobinson can't think of anything of the top of his somewhat frazzled head 15:43
j_dulaney Nothing from me, other than that the patch should be attached to the bug by this evening 15:43
tflink pbrobinson: let me know if there is anything you want help with 15:43
jlaska #topic Open Discussion - <your topic here> 15:44
jlaska alright ... anything else to cover today? 15:44
jlaska okay ... last call for topics 15:44
* jlaska sets the fuse for 1 minute until #endmeeting 15:44
pbrobinson tflink: will do 15:45
* j_dulaney runs off to the head. Been holding it too long. 15:45
jlaska tmi :) 15:45
jlaska okay, 15 seconds ... 15:45
jlaska I'll follow-up to the list with minutes 15:45
jlaska as always, thanks everyone for your time 15:46
jlaska #endmeeting 15:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA/Meetings/20110523&oldid=237660"