From Fedora Project Wiki

< QA‎ | Meetings

Revision as of 22:36, 22 April 2013 by Adamwill (talk | contribs) (update page with the results of the meeting)

Attendees

  • adamw (94)
  • dan408 (40)
  • tflink (23)
  • kparal (22)
  • j_dulaney (14)
  • jreznik (14)
  • pjones (6)
  • zodbot (4)
  • brunowolff (3)
  • nirik (2)
  • satellit_e (2)
  • martix (1)
  • j_dulane1 (1)
  • mkrizek (1)
  • Southern_Gentlem (1)
  • pschindl (1)

Agenda

  • Previous meeting follow-up
  • Fedora 19 Alpha status/recap
  • Beta release criteria
  • Test Days
  • Open floor

Previous meeting follow-up

  • adamw to send out another call for UEFI testing with TC6 - this was done, and we got a good amount of UEFI testing before go/no-go
  • jreznik to follow up on status of Translations (l10n) test day- jreznik did so, and the event went off well

Fedora 19 Alpha recap

  • Alpha was signed off and ready to go
  • adamw created and populated the Common_F19_bugs page
  • kparal noted the tracker bug aliases are kind of long at present (kparal); adamw explained the old-style aliases are only going to be used for F19 as a 'backwards compatibility' measure, from F20 onwards bugs will have only the new-style aliases
  • There was a vote of thanks to all Alpha testers

Beta planning

  • anaconda recently revised how containers (LVM, btrfs) are handled in custom partitioning: we will get some images to do some testing of those changes shortly
  • The first blocker review meeting was scheduled for 04-24, Beta TC1 for 04-30
  • The new-style Beta release criteria still needed to be finished off

Test Days

Open floor

  • tflink reported that the blocker bug proposal webapp should go into production during the week

Action items

  • adamw to complete Beta criteria update
  • adamw to add iscsi test case back to the matrix

IRC Log

randomuser #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:00
zodbot Meeting started Mon Apr 22 14:00:40 2013 UTC. The chair is randomuser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00
zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00
randomuser #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00
zodbot The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00
randomuser #topic Roll Call 14:00
* Capesteve is here 14:01
randomuser good morning to those it applies to 14:01
randomuser and hello to the others :) 14:02
Capesteve Good morning 14:02
Capesteve GDTY covers all 14:02
* randomuser nods 14:02
randomuser i've heard that one... it seems so generic 14:02
jjmcd 14:03
Capesteve from the days of Telex 14:03
* pkovar is here 14:03
randomuser i see bcotton lurking 14:05
randomuser Sparks, Sparks_t1o , are you here? 14:05
* bcotton is here 14:05
* jjmcd is working a widespread flooding incident - only partly paying attention 14:05
randomuser thanks for turning out, jjmcd 14:07
randomuser #topic follow up on action items 14:07
randomuser one item here - I was to mail the list about using bugs to track Changes 14:07
randomuser which I did - it seems like a good place to start discussion 14:07
randomuser #topic Using Bugzilla to track Changes 14:08
randomuser The idea is to give us, and other groups, a centralized way to track rthe Changes process. bugzilla appears to be the best tool we have in production to do this. 14:08
randomuser Any thoughts? unnecessary work, or wonderful idea? 14:09
randomuser Capesteve, pkovar how do you guys track your upcoming work? 14:11
Capesteve bugzilla mostly 14:11
Capesteve more and more using bugzilla 14:11
randomuser tracking bugs / assignments as much as user-driven reports, then? 14:12
pkovar tracking bugs, yes 14:12
Capesteve Some planing was done in using other tools, but we turn our tasks into bugs 14:13
randomuser does it seem effective? any obvious pitfalls to it? 14:13
Capesteve brain storming, wish lists can be done in a collab tool of choice, but distill the action items into bugs 14:14
randomuser i like that idea, but out scale doesn't really require it for general use 14:15
randomuser s/out/our 14:15
Capesteve I think etherpad for a week or so, then store the agreed action in a wiki page might be enough for you 14:16
* randomuser nods 14:16
Capesteve but don't use wiki for things that change a lot 14:16
randomuser there probably is a wiki page, somewhere, we could use 14:16
Capesteve wait till you agree its at "1st draft" stage 14:17
pkovar it looks like etherpard is not used that much in fedora.. for some reason. is there a fedora instance of etherpad somewhere? 14:18
randomuser we have a gobby instance, though it doesn't get much use 14:18
randomuser at least not by docs people 14:18
pkovar aha 14:18
pkovar ah, i see it's a desktop app 14:19
randomuser I've only used it a couple times 14:20
pkovar a web app works better for this purpose i think 14:20
randomuser yeah, the barrier to use would be less 14:20
randomuser with etherpad, you can just share a link 14:21
* randomuser isn't seeing any reason not to use BZ for tracking Changes 14:21
randomuser #topic Beat Assignments 14:23
randomuser #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats 14:23
randomuser Beats are still open 14:23
randomuser people are working on them, i see 14:24
randomuser i've been doing some research on the unclaimed ones, it's a daunting task 14:24
randomuser ... 14:25
randomuser #topic Search for fp.o 14:26
jjmcd Is there a Tech Notes available? 14:26
randomuser jjmcd, not at this point, but I could spin one up today 14:27
jjmcd I plan to hit embedded, circuits, etc. But I could use other tools 14:27
jjmcd Tech notes makes it easier, tho 14:27
randomuser sure, I'll take care of that this evening 14:28
jjmcd thanks 14:28
randomuser jjmcd, I'm more willing to do things like that than I am likely to remember what needs to be done :P 14:28
jjmcd I resemble that! 14:28
* randomuser smirks 14:29
randomuser nirik, are you around to talk about search stuffs? 14:29
nirik I'm here (barely), but don't have much news to report on that... 14:29
randomuser fair enough, thanks 14:29
* randomuser slides a mug of coffee over to nirik 14:29
randomuser hmm.. the author representation in the brand could use some more list time, i think 14:30
randomuser pkovar, would you like to talk about the user guide? 14:31
pkovar randomuser: ok 14:31
randomuser #topic retiring the user guide 14:31
pkovar i think we got mostly positive feedback 14:31
nb +1 14:31
pkovar on retiring the guide 14:31
* Sparks is here 14:32
pkovar that is: closing the bugs 14:32
pkovar and 14:32
pkovar updating the guide table 14:32
randomuser I'm +1 for this 14:33
pkovar (and point people to DE's user help when appropriate) 14:33
randomuser expecially with gnome-initial-setup 14:33
pkovar right 14:33
randomuser pkovar, are you planning on handling the bugs? 14:34
pkovar randomuser: yes, i will close them (all) :) 14:34
randomuser pkovar, cool, thanks. Keep an eye out for bugs that might conceivably apply to guides we *do* maintain, please 14:35
pkovar sure 14:35
randomuser Sparks, hello, do have anything for us? 14:36
randomuser #chair Sparks 14:36
zodbot Current chairs: Sparks randomuser 14:36
randomuser we'll touch on bugs in the meantime 14:37
randomuser #topic outstanding BZ tickets 14:37
randomuser http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:38
randomuser we have some bugs 14:38
randomuser any of concern? 14:38
Sparks . 14:41
Sparks I know of an easy way to close all the user-guide bugs if you'd like me to do so 14:41
pkovar me too :-) 14:41
Sparks pkovar: Okay, just checking 14:42
randomuser heh, glad I didn't volunteer for it, then 14:42
kushal Sparks, may be a python script 14:42
Sparks No, bugzilla lets you modify multiple bugs at once 14:42
Sparks kushal: Make it do the work for you 14:42
randomuser #topic Open Floor 14:44
randomuser alright, folks, go nuts 14:44
randomuser I'm sure there's something I've forgotten 14:44
jreznik ops, /me missed docs meeting :( sorry guys 14:46
randomuser jreznik, the floor is yours, if you have anything 14:46
jreznik randomuser: just re-read the tracking part - do you have a plan how to proceed? 14:47
jreznik for alpha - anything still needed from docs? I see release notes now links to announcement, I'd say it makes sense 14:47
randomuser jreznik, I'm thinking that when the time comes, we assign someone to create bugs for each Change and wrangle writers for them 14:48
randomuser I'm not sure what else we need to plan in that context 14:49
randomuser jreznik, I don't have much ready for alpha, regrettably, but I don't see why that should hold anything up 14:50
jreznik seems reasonable, the same I do for devels and I can help you too with wrangling docs (just I don't have an overview of who to assign what but ... definitely I'm here) 14:50
randomuser jreznik, we can use the beats table as a rough guide, but it might be best to ask for volunteers 14:51
randomuser at least until we ease people into the idea of checking for bugs assigned to them 14:52
jreznik beats owner + asking people if they are willing to do it is probably the best thing - at least for beginning 14:52
jreznik thank you very much randomuser, I think docs are pretty well covered - I'd like to start as soon as possible, now to make marketing meeting today and ;-) 14:53
* randomuser nods 14:54
randomuser You're an excellent wrangler, jreznik, thanks for your help 14:54
* randomuser really benefits from the occasional prodding 14:55
randomuser just a few minutes left, last call on the open floor 14:55
randomuser thanks for coming, everyone! 14:59
randomuser #endmeeting 14:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!