From Fedora Project Wiki

< SIGs‎ | KDE‎ | Meetings

No edit summary
(Summary part 1)
Line 31: Line 31:
== Summary ==
== Summary ==


''(to be filled in after the meeting)''
'''kde-l10n srpm split'''
* Than proposed %subject% - split current one big srpm to many packages
* pros/cons
** pros are more flexible and smaller updates, build of current srpm is time consuming in case of buggy kde-l10n package
** cons - koji/bodhi overhead/more packages, has to be scripted
* Rex Dieter is going to revive/work on his script/template
* FKDESCo agreed on this conditionally
** automation script is ready and usable
 
'''plasma-netbook'''
* jreznik, svahl and mefoster are willing to lead Plasma Netbook effort
* step #1 - create a separate comps group for kde-netbook, then probably spin
* intelligent cherry picking of packages to be on (and needs split/reorganization)
** kdeplasma-addons needed, problem due to kdeedu-marble
* tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549746
 
'''qtwebkit JIT'''
 


=== recent bugs ===
=== recent bugs ===

Revision as of 15:50, 12 January 2010

Meeting Time

Participants

Agenda

Transcript

Summary

kde-l10n srpm split

  • Than proposed %subject% - split current one big srpm to many packages
  • pros/cons
    • pros are more flexible and smaller updates, build of current srpm is time consuming in case of buggy kde-l10n package
    • cons - koji/bodhi overhead/more packages, has to be scripted
  • Rex Dieter is going to revive/work on his script/template
  • FKDESCo agreed on this conditionally
    • automation script is ready and usable

plasma-netbook

  • jreznik, svahl and mefoster are willing to lead Plasma Netbook effort
  • step #1 - create a separate comps group for kde-netbook, then probably spin
  • intelligent cherry picking of packages to be on (and needs split/reorganization)
    • kdeplasma-addons needed, problem due to kdeedu-marble
  • tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549746

qtwebkit JIT


recent bugs

Comments