Talk:Features/procps-ng

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012
 
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012
 +
 +
See [https://bugzilla.redhat.co/show_bug.cgi?id=801626 rhbz#801626].
 +
 +
--[[User:jpokorny|jpokorny]] 27 July 2012

Revision as of 11:50, 27 July 2012

..."some of the newly written patches were incompatible with sources maintained by other distributors. A similar incompatibility could be noticed in the applications behaviour and their command line switches"...

Yet "User Experience" says "No major changes expected" - can both be true?

The "Release notes" section should contain release notes for Fedora - probably listing the incompatible changes.

--Mitr 14:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Question that is related but not directly relevant for the feature acceptance: is there any reason why this isn't integrated into util-linux?

--Lennart 15:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Please, please, please no more *-ng projects. It makes almost no sense. Just take over the package, nobody cares; and changing names causes nothing but trouble for no good reason. Or just merge it into util-linux, which makes the most sense of all options. It can share a lot off stuff, and we do not really need separate maintenance for such packages anyway.

--Kay 14 May 2012

See rhbz#801626.

--jpokorny 27 July 2012