Revision as of 06:34, 8 September 2008
Red Hat Czech - QA engineer
Inasnum - Fedora package sanity checker
* prepare phase - failure terminates test * server prepares a job * gets new packages list for an pending advisory (e.g. FEDORA-2008-6415 - drupal-6.3-1.fc9) using Bodhi and Koji * creates repo_advisory with packages from the advisory (from Koji) * creates new_advisory.list file with `N E V R A` of the packages from the advisory * creates new_src_advisory.list file with `N E V R A` of the source package(s) from the advisory * updates repo_update - just mirror of oficial Fedora Updates repo * server creates a LVM snapshot where the clinet will be stared * client boots up and updates itself from the repo_update repo * test phase * client queries a job from server, do the test with packages from the repo_advisory repo * all new packages installable/updatable? * no rpm verification issues or only whitelisted ones? * are these packages rebuidable? * no file-conflicts? * ... * report results to the server * clean up phase * server destroys test system, delete its snapshot partition
rpmfluff is a lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them so they are broken in controlled ways.
It is intended for use when testing RPM-testers e.g. rpmlint and writing test cases for RPM tools e.g. yum