From Fedora Project Wiki

m (My packages)
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Matthias Runge=  
=Matthias Runge=  
== contact==
= about =
Matthias Runge is a Software Engineer at Red Hat, working upstream on OpenStack Horizon.
|email: ||mrunge at fedoraproject dot org
|icq:|| 252709172
|irc: ||mrunge at #fedora-de, #fedora
| snail mail: || please contact me directly to get an address. I'm located in the north western part of Germany
He is using Fedora since it's first version and Red Hat Linux since 3.3.
I'm using Fedora since it's first version and RedHat Linux since 3.3. I'm contributing to fedora project through testing new packages, writing bug reports, and end user support.
= Packages and Packaging =
= Reviews and packages =  
== My packages ==
* [  Reviews]
* django-lint
* [  My open review requests]
* perl-IPC-Signal
* [  My packages]
=== pending ===
* logcheck
* lockfile-progs
* liblockfile
* perl-mime-construct
* perl-Proc-WaitStat
== Review Template ==
== sponsorees ==  
(taken from
* [[User:Zultron|John Morris]]
because I like it.
* [[User:Nmarques|Nelson Marques]]
* [[User:Waterlan|Erik Waterlan]]
Package Review
* [[User:Ndipanov|Nikola Dipanov]]
* [[User:Dprince|Dan Prince]]
* [[User:Otherwiseguy|Terry Wilson]]
* [[User:Buzztroll|John Bresnahan]]
* [[User:Jruzicka|Jakub Ruzicka]]
* [[User:Vpopovic|Vladan Popovic]]
* [[User:flaper87|Flavio Percoco]]
* [[User:shardy|Steven Hardy]]
== badges ==
- = N/A
{{#fedorabadges: mrunge}}
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
[ ]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]  Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
[ ]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[ ]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture.
Tested on:
[ ]  Rpmlint output:
[ ]  Package is not relocatable.
[ ]  Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[ ]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[ ]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[ ]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package    :
MD5SUM upstream package:
[ ]  Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
[ ]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[ ]  The spec file handles locales properly.
[ ]  ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[ ]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[ ]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[ ]  Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[ ]  Package consistently uses macros.
[ ]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[ ]  Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[ ]  Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]  Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[ ]  Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[ ]  Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[ ]  Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[ ]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[ ]  Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[ ]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]  Latest version is packaged.
[ ]  Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]  Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:
[ ]  Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
Tested on:
[ ]  Package functions as described.
[ ]  Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[ ]  The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[ ]  File based requires are sane.
=== Issues ===
=== Final Notes ===
*** APPROVED ***
*** REJECTED ***

Revision as of 11:55, 25 November 2013

Matthias Runge


Matthias Runge is a Software Engineer at Red Hat, working upstream on OpenStack Horizon.

He is using Fedora since it's first version and Red Hat Linux since 3.3.

Reviews and packages



Bloggin' it! (Planet II) Partners in Crime White Hat If you build it... (Koji Success II) If you build it... (Koji Success I) If you build it... (Koji Success III) You can call me "Patches" (SCM I) You can call me "Patches" (SCM II) You can call me "Patches" (SCM III) Like a Rock (Updates-Stable II) Like a Rock (Updates-Stable I) Let Me Introduce Myself Involvement Proven Tester Proven Packager Junior Badger (Badger I) Catching the Bull (Tester IV) Discovery of the Footprints (Tester II) Taming the Bull (Tester V) In Search of the Bull (Tester I) Perceiving the Bull (Tester III) Is this thing on? (Updates-Testing I) Is this thing on? (Updates-Testing II) Associate Editor Tagger (Tagger II) Junior Editor Riddle Me This Bona Fide Junior Tagger (Tagger I) Curious Penguin (Ask Fedora I) Paranoid Panda Badge Muse (Badge Ideas I) Mugshot Bloggin' it! (Planet I) Packager Sponsor White Rabbit What goes up... (Koji Failure III) What goes up... (Koji Failure I) Riding the Bull Home (Tester VI) What goes up... (Koji Failure II) Nuancier Embryo Speak Up! Secretary General Senior Badger (Badger II) If you build it... (Koji Success IV) Ambassador Baby Badger Curious Penguin (Ask Fedora II) Old Yeller Tadpole Egg Tadpole with Legs Binary Star Is this thing on? (Updates-Testing III) What goes around comes around (Karma II) Override, you say? FOSDEM 2014 Attendee Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build I) Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build II) DevConf 2014 Attendee Bloggin' it! (Planet III) What goes around comes around (Karma I) It still works! The Bull Transcended (Tester VII) Missed the Train Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build III) You can call me "Patches" (SCM IV) Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build IV) Curious Penguin (Ask Fedora III) Take this and call me in the morning Helping Hand Senior Tagger (Tagger III) Vacation Like a Rock (Updates-Stable III) Keepin Fedora Beautiful (F21) Junior Package Tagger (Package Tagger I) Senior Package Tagger (Package Tagger III) Package Tagger (Package Tagger II) Senior Editor The cat came back... Nuancier 21 Consolation Prize Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build V) Corporate Drone Corporate Shill Science (Kernel Tester I) Associate Badger (Badger 1.5) FOSDEM 2015 Attendee Master Badger (Badger III) Bloggin' it! (Planet IV) DevConf 2015 Attendee DevConf 2015 Speaker Froglet Origin Delivery What goes around comes around (Karma III) Macaron (Cookie I) Fedora 22 Change Accepted Telegraphist (Upstream Release Monitoring I) Patches (SCM V) What goes up... (Koji Failure IV) Top 100 FOSDEM 2016 Attendee Top 500 DevConf 2016 Attendee DevConf 2016 Speaker Chocolate Chip (Cookie II) Nuancier F24 Master Editor Python SIG member Science (Kernel Tester II) Parselmouth I Parselmouth II Science (Kernel Tester III) Building the Outer Ring (Copr Build VI) Parselmouth III Nuancier F25 All your $arch are belong to us (Koji Success V) Nuancier F26 Top 25 Black and White (Cookie III) Fedora 28 Change Accepted FOSDEM 2018 Attendee Nuancier F28 Unchained Science (Kernel Tester IV)