| j_dulaney
|
#startmeeting Fedora QA 29-08-11
|
15:00
|
| zodbot
|
Meeting started Mon Aug 29 15:00:02 2011 UTC. The chair is j_dulaney. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
|
15:00
|
| zodbot
|
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
|
15:00
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic Roll Call
|
15:00
|
| j_dulaney
|
How are y'all doing today?
|
15:00
|
| * athmane is around
|
15:00
|
| adamw
|
yo
|
15:01
|
| * kparal here
|
15:01
|
| * mkrizek present
|
15:01
|
| * jskladan lurks
|
15:01
|
| j_dulaney
|
atmane, adamw (thanks for sending out the reminder), kparal, mkrizek, jskladan
|
15:01
|
| * pschindl is here
|
15:02
|
| j_dulaney
|
pschindl, how are ye this day?
|
15:02
|
| * j_dulaney gives another minute
|
15:03
|
| j_dulaney
|
Ok
|
15:04
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic Previous Meeting Followup
|
15:04
|
| j_dulaney
|
adamw: You and I both seem to have got up with Rel-Eng about bumping up TC's
|
15:05
|
| adamw
|
this is "j_dulaney - check in with anaconda and releng teams on the feasibility of making the rats point (08-31) ", right?
|
15:05
|
| adamw
|
yup, since both were around during the blocker review meeting i figured i'd seize the day
|
15:05
|
| adamw
|
er, 'making the rats point into TC1, that should read, i think
|
15:05
|
| j_dulaney
|
adamw: Indeed
|
15:06
|
| adamw
|
yup...so they both seemed fine with it when i asked
|
15:07
|
| j_dulaney
|
I got up with dgilmore, and he said that he had no problem doing it
|
15:07
|
| adamw
|
any different data for you?
|
15:07
|
| j_dulaney
|
Nope
|
15:07
|
| adamw
|
cool
|
15:07
|
| adamw
|
so, i filed a ticket requesting tc images:
|
15:08
|
| adamw
|
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4902
|
15:08
|
| robatino
|
the schedule needs to be updated - still says 2011-09-06
|
15:08
|
| j_dulaney
|
Ping rbergeron
|
15:09
|
| adamw
|
oh, yeah, we could ask robyn to update that
|
15:09
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anyone want to do that?
|
15:09
|
| adamw
|
i got it
|
15:10
|
| j_dulaney
|
#action adamw to ping rbergeron about updating the the schedule to include the new TCs
|
15:10
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anything else?
|
15:11
|
| adamw
|
there's one action item for tflink
|
15:11
|
| adamw
|
but i don't see him...
|
15:11
|
| adamw
|
oh, right, he's off today
|
15:11
|
| j_dulaney
|
Ah
|
15:12
|
| adamw
|
so we can check in with him later
|
15:12
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:12
|
| j_dulaney
|
Want to poke him about that?
|
15:12
|
| adamw
|
sure
|
15:12
|
| j_dulaney
|
Need an action for that?
|
15:13
|
| adamw
|
sure
|
15:13
|
| j_dulaney
|
#action adamw to check in with tflink about alpha/beta/final validation results and ensuring bugs are correctly marked as blockers
|
15:14
|
| j_dulaney
|
Moving on...
|
15:14
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic Beta Preperation
|
15:14
|
| j_dulaney
|
TC1 should now be coming out next Wednesday
|
15:15
|
| adamw
|
this wednesday
|
15:15
|
| adamw
|
aka two days time
|
15:16
|
| j_dulaney
|
Looks like we've got sixteen proposed blockers already
|
15:16
|
| adamw
|
a lot of them modified, though
|
15:16
|
| j_dulaney
|
True
|
15:17
|
| * Southern_Gentlem waiting for beta release candidates to see if my dual boot issues are solved
|
15:17
|
| j_dulaney
|
All but four
|
15:17
|
| adamw
|
there's only three that aren't, and they aren't showstoppers, so TC1 should at least be in shape for testing as far as we know
|
15:17
|
| adamw
|
me no count good?
|
15:17
|
| j_dulaney
|
There's one a third the way down marked ASSIGNED
|
15:18
|
| adamw
|
oh yeah. me no count good.
|
15:19
|
| adamw
|
well, that one's okay too. so yeah, tc1 should be testable at least.
|
15:19
|
| adamw
|
anyone tried a nightly lately?
|
15:19
|
| j_dulaney
|
But, one of them should now be fixed, and hasn't had the status changed
|
15:19
|
| j_dulaney
|
.bug 728193
|
15:20
|
| zodbot
|
j_dulaney: Bug 728193 preupgrade cannot retrieve repomd.xml - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728193
|
15:20
|
| j_dulaney
|
I noticed this one on 686 (didn't check to see if a bug was filed), and spoke directly with nirik. It was fixed that day
|
15:20
|
| j_dulaney
|
This was a week ago
|
15:20
|
| j_dulaney
|
It works now
|
15:20
|
| j_dulaney
|
At least for 686
|
15:21
|
| adamw
|
cool
|
15:21
|
| nirik
|
it should work. Let me know if it doesn't.
|
15:21
|
| adamw
|
maybe add a comment on the bug
|
15:21
|
| * j_dulaney does so
|
15:21
|
| j_dulaney
|
Want to run through any other proposed bugs right quick?
|
15:22
|
| adamw
|
nah
|
15:23
|
| adamw
|
we only need to do that when we're getting down to the wire
|
15:23
|
| adamw
|
weekly blocker review is fine right now
|
15:23
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:23
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anything else, then, for Beta preperation?
|
15:24
|
| adamw
|
nope, i think we're looking good right now
|
15:24
|
| j_dulaney
|
Alright
|
15:24
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic l10n / i18n test week
|
15:24
|
| j_dulaney
|
Other than being pushed back a week, does anyone have input on this?
|
15:25
|
| j_dulaney
|
The i18 compose should land simultaniously with TC1, I believe
|
15:26
|
| adamw
|
i was hoping some of the organizers would be around to update us
|
15:27
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:27
|
| adamw
|
doesn't look like they are, but it looks like they have the pages nicely in place
|
15:28
|
| nirik
|
it was setup last night I think...
|
15:28
|
| adamw
|
so there will be test days tomorrow, wednesday and thursday
|
15:28
|
| nirik
|
the compose... just using a nightly.
|
15:28
|
| adamw
|
everybody come and help if you can, blog about them, etc
|
15:28
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:28
|
| nirik
|
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/f16-translation/
|
15:28
|
| adamw
|
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-30_L10n_Desktop
|
15:29
|
| adamw
|
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-31_L10n_I18n_Installation
|
15:29
|
| adamw
|
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-01_I18n_Desktop
|
15:29
|
| * j_dulaney thinks that he'll be testing his French more than the image...
|
15:29
|
| adamw
|
hehe
|
15:30
|
| adamw
|
you can usually get at least some useful testing in without knowing another language at all
|
15:30
|
| adamw
|
at least of the 'does it run / look vaguely correct' school
|
15:30
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:31
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anything else?
|
15:32
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic AutoQA Update
|
15:32
|
| j_dulaney
|
kparal, jskladan, have anything?
|
15:32
|
| * kparal points finger at jskladan
|
15:33
|
| jskladan
|
not much on the "visible front"
|
15:33
|
| j_dulaney
|
How are we on getting along to 0.7?
|
15:33
|
| jskladan
|
I'm currently working on RestulsDB / AutoQA co-operation
|
15:33
|
| jskladan
|
(hence the #373)
|
15:34
|
| kparal
|
I was last week on vacation, but I believe 0.7 is progressing slowly
|
15:34
|
| jskladan
|
^^
|
15:34
|
| adamw
|
anything else interesting happening in the last week?
|
15:34
|
| kparal
|
the two most important changes are the resultsdb one that jskladan is working on
|
15:34
|
| kparal
|
and I have seen some progress in tflink's weekly report about the url shortening service
|
15:35
|
| kparal
|
but he's off today
|
15:35
|
| jskladan
|
adamw: I belive that mkrizek has the shortening service in bodhi
|
15:35
|
| kparal
|
yourls package
|
15:35
|
| jskladan
|
even thought the update for PHP makes it fail depcheck in F14/15
|
15:36
|
| mkrizek
|
yes, yourls is in bodhi
|
15:36
|
| mkrizek
|
finally got sponsored
|
15:36
|
| adamw
|
awesome!
|
15:36
|
| j_dulaney
|
Noice
|
15:36
|
| adamw
|
great job mkrizek
|
15:36
|
| kparal
|
and tflink asked for package review for his python bindings for yourls
|
15:36
|
| kparal
|
on test list
|
15:36
|
| adamw
|
okay
|
15:36
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:36
|
| adamw
|
anyone want to help out with a review?
|
15:36
|
| mkrizek
|
I think I can
|
15:37
|
| mkrizek
|
I am not really sure if I can do a proper review or just informal
|
15:37
|
| j_dulaney
|
#action mkrizek to review tflink's Python bindings for yourls
|
15:37
|
| j_dulaney
|
mkrizek: Are you a packager?
|
15:38
|
| mkrizek
|
j_dulaney: I am in this group "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group (user)"
|
15:38
|
| adamw
|
any sponsored packager can review any other sponsored packager's packages, i believe
|
15:39
|
| kparal
|
mkrizek just started with packaging. he can definitely do an informal one, I don't know whether it's appropriate for him to do a formal one
|
15:39
|
| j_dulaney
|
True
|
15:39
|
| * j_dulaney is not a packager
|
15:39
|
| adamw
|
right, i believe he can but it might be best for someone else to check it over too
|
15:40
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anyone want to ask on Devel?
|
15:41
|
| elad661
|
he can
|
15:41
|
| j_dulaney
|
elad661: You mean tflink?
|
15:42
|
| adamw
|
no, i believe elad meant 'mkrizek can do the review'
|
15:42
|
| kparal
|
yes, no need to do it for him :)
|
15:42
|
| kparal
|
aha
|
15:42
|
| elad661
|
adamw: yep
|
15:42
|
| adamw
|
maybe mkrizek can do an initial review, he and tflink can work through the issues, then maybe request a final check on test or devel list?
|
15:43
|
| mkrizek
|
sounds good
|
15:43
|
| j_dulaney
|
Indeed
|
15:43
|
| adamw
|
ok
|
15:43
|
| j_dulaney
|
#agreed mkrizek to do initial review of yourls python bindings, with tflink checking up on Devel or Test
|
15:44
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anything else
|
15:44
|
| kparal
|
that's all
|
15:44
|
| j_dulaney
|
#topic Open Discussion (Your Topic Here)
|
15:45
|
| j_dulaney
|
Anyone have anything?
|
15:45
|
| j_dulaney
|
Two minutes to #endmeeting
|
15:46
|
| adamw
|
nothin from me
|
15:46
|
| * jsmith has nothing further
|
15:46
|
| j_dulaney
|
Thanks for coming out, y'all!
|
15:48
|
| j_dulaney
|
#endmeeting
|
15:48
|
