Ambassadors/Mentors Survey Summary

What were your expectations when you signed up to become a mentor?

 * give guidance and help
 * teach people on our tools
 * improve the quality performance of new Ambassadors
 * find and encourage the future leaders

How much of these have been met in the current form of the mentor-candidate relationship?

 * all of them
 * some good relationships - and some just protocol
 * not much - because Candidates are not fit enough

Do Mentors have enough feedback on the accountability and transparency of the system with https://fedorahosted.org/fama/?

 * yes enough Feedback
 * FAmA Trac provides the Transparency
 * No - more Infos should be required from the Candidate before he is allowed to contact the Mentor
 * Update the Infos around that instance

Do you consider the need for any tooling to help with this workflow (Memberhsip Wizard was a big improvement!)?

 * No need for more tooling
 * human contact over tooling
 * standard mentor requirements
 * have a "goal" and a wikipage as a requirement before contacting the Mentor

Do we need higher entry barriers for Ambassadors (examples: requiring some time in the Fedora Project, CLA+1, proven work on tasks)?

 * not necessarily - it is important what the contributor can become
 * process must be more streamlined
 * not sure - there are good pro and cons
 * Yes

We had discussion on Mentors who were proposed as a Mentor without running a single Event before, do we need more entry requirements for Ambassador Mentors?

 * no, only trust and judgement is needed
 * no, because knowledged and experienced is stated already and therefore the requirement
 * minimum time requirement in the group should be a "must"
 * events experience is a "must"

Do you think the Mentoring Process is clear enough?

 * yes
 * freedom to the mentors is good - but uneven
 * yes, but in some parts outdated

Do you feel that your Region is well enough covered with Mentors?

 * EMEA: Yes
 * NA: Yes
 * APAC: One needed for India(has one more since 2 weeks) and one ore two more for China
 * LATAM: One more needed for Brazil

Should Mentors meet? If yes, how often?

 * Yes
 * Once a month

Do you think Ambassadors Mentoring brought quality improvement to the Ambassadors Group?

 * Yes
 * provide Mentoring to people who are already Ambassadors

Can you think of any other improvements/suggestions we should focus in the future to have better Membership experience?

 * Leveling System
 * longer "find a mentor period" to 21 Days
 * Streamlining the Process to prefilter Candidates who never will make a Wikipage or have no goals
 * more common requirements from Mentors