https://fedoraproject.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Ycdmdj&feedformat=atomFedora Project Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T18:13:27ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.39.4https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Features/TeXLive&diff=226114Features/TeXLive2011-03-10T16:14:35Z<p>Ycdmdj: Edited meaningless phrase in the stable release section.</p>
<hr />
<div>= TeX Live 2010 =<br />
<br />
== Summary ==<br />
<br />
Upgrade TeX Live to 2010. Use packaging based on upstream metadata and don't use monolithic build any more.<br />
<br />
== Owner ==<br />
* Name: [[User:jnovy|Jindrich Novy]] jnovy at redhat dot com<br />
<br />
== Current status ==<br />
* Targeted release: [[Releases/15 | Fedora 15]] <br />
* Last updated: 2009-10-22<br />
* Percentage of completion: 60%<br />
<br />
== Detailed Description ==<br />
<br />
TeX Live uses uses its own classification of TeX packages which can be automated and used by packaging systems in various distributions. The packaging metadata that upstream provides allows to distinguish doc, source and runtime files which could then be packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== Benefit to Fedora ==<br />
<br />
A better packaging scheme allows to reduce bandwidth and save significant disc space. It also allows simpler maintenance of separate TeX packages.<br />
<br />
== Scope ==<br />
<br />
Requires packaging or testing and/or enhancements in fedora infrastructure, currently 1627 new packages are to be reviewed and added.<br />
<br />
== How To Test ==<br />
You have two options.<br />
<br />
=== TeX Live 2010 stable ===<br />
<br />
If you prefer a TeX Live 2010 stable release (recommended for most users), please follow these repositories:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f13/texlive-release-2010-2.20100720.fc13.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f14/texlive-release-2010-2.20100720.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
=== TeX Live 2011 development ===<br />
For the latest TeX Live 2011/dev install this repository please follow these repositories:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f13-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f14-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 15/rawhide:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f15-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
=== Common part ===<br />
The package contains repo file for yum which contains TeX Live with binaries. After installing the release package do:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum install texlive<br />
<br />
if you don't have texlive already installed. Otherwise you can update your old TeX Live 2007 installation like:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum update<br />
<br />
This will install the basic TeX Live scheme. You can alternatively install any of these schemes:<br />
texlive-scheme-basic<br />
texlive-scheme-context<br />
texlive-scheme-full<br />
texlive-scheme-gust<br />
texlive-scheme-medium<br />
texlive-scheme-minimal<br />
texlive-scheme-tetex<br />
texlive-scheme-xml<br />
<br />
or various pre-set TeX Live collections, the list is here:<br />
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/collections<br />
<br />
You are also able to install a particular style via:<br />
<br />
# yum install 'tex(epsfig.sty)'<br />
<br />
There are possible clashes with applications packaged separately (such as<br />
dvipdfmx, etc.) so we may want to discuss these conflicts with<br />
respective fedora package maintainers to fix them. In case you are a<br />
maintainer of such package please send me an email to me<br />
so that we can sort it out on the TeX Live side. Generally the TeX<br />
Live packages are preferred so I will grant access to them to maintainers<br />
that owned the non-TeX Live package variant packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== User Experience ==<br />
<br />
Users could use exactly the part of TeX they need without wasting disc space.<br />
<br />
== Dependencies ==<br />
<br />
# need to do a license audit - done automatically because upstream metadata contains codes for package licenses<br />
# need mass review for all packages before this feature is completed - '''DONE'''<br />
# import of all of the ~1600 packages need to be finished<br />
# all of the packages need to be built<br />
<br />
== Contingency Plan ==<br />
<br />
Stay stuck with TeX Live 2007.<br />
<br />
== Documentation ==<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Release Notes ==<br />
TeX Live 2010 is now introduced with improved packaging scheme that saves download bandwidth and disc size. It is based on upstream packaging metadata and an automated license audit is performed. Packages are now composed from schemes and collections to define a package set user needs to install to use a particular TeX Live feature.<br />
<br />
== Comments and Discussion ==<br />
<br />
* This feature has its own mailing list: [http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/]. Feel free to subscribe and post to this list. <br />
<br />
* See [[Talk:Features/TeXLive]] <!-- This adds a link to the "discussion" tab associated with your page. This provides the ability to have ongoing comments or conversation without bogging down the main feature page --><br />
<br />
[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ru_RU/Features/TeXLive Ru TexLive 2009]</div>Ycdmdjhttps://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Features/TeXLive&diff=218505Features/TeXLive2011-01-31T20:51:35Z<p>Ycdmdj: changed order of some paragraphs.</p>
<hr />
<div>= TeX Live 2010 =<br />
<br />
== Summary ==<br />
<br />
Upgrade TeX Live to 2010. Use packaging based on upstream metadata and don't use monolithic build any more.<br />
<br />
== Owner ==<br />
* Name: [[User:jnovy|Jindrich Novy]] jnovy at redhat dot com<br />
<br />
== Current status ==<br />
* Targeted release: [[Releases/15 | Fedora 15]] <br />
* Last updated: 2009-10-22<br />
* Percentage of completion: 60%<br />
<br />
== Detailed Description ==<br />
<br />
TeX Live uses uses its own classification of TeX packages which can be automated and used by packaging systems in various distributions. The packaging metadata that upstream provides allows to distinguish doc, source and runtime files which could then be packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== Benefit to Fedora ==<br />
<br />
A better packaging scheme allows to reduce bandwidth and save significant disc space. It also allows simpler maintenance of separate TeX packages.<br />
<br />
== Scope ==<br />
<br />
Requires packaging or testing and/or enhancements in fedora infrastructure, currently 1627 new packages are to be reviewed and added.<br />
<br />
== How To Test ==<br />
You have two options.<br />
<br />
=== TeX Live 2010 stable ===<br />
<br />
If you prefer to not to have a TeX Live 2010 stable release (recommended for most users), please follow these repositories:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f13/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc13.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f14/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
=== TeX Live 2011 development ===<br />
For the latest TeX Live 2011/dev install this repository please follow these repositories:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f13-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f14-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 15/rawhide:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f15-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
=== Common part ===<br />
The package contains repo file for yum which contains TeX Live with binaries. After installing the release package do:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum install texlive<br />
<br />
if you don't have texlive already installed. Otherwise you can update your old TeX Live 2007 installation like:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum update<br />
<br />
This will install the basic TeX Live scheme. You can alternatively install any of these schemes:<br />
texlive-scheme-basic<br />
texlive-scheme-context<br />
texlive-scheme-full<br />
texlive-scheme-gust<br />
texlive-scheme-medium<br />
texlive-scheme-minimal<br />
texlive-scheme-tetex<br />
texlive-scheme-xml<br />
<br />
or various pre-set TeX Live collections, the list is here:<br />
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/collections<br />
<br />
You are also able to install a particular style via:<br />
<br />
# yum install 'tex(epsfig.sty)'<br />
<br />
There are possible clashes with applications packaged separately (such as<br />
dvipdfmx, etc.) so we may want to discuss these conflicts with<br />
respective fedora package maintainers to fix them. In case you are a<br />
maintainer of such package please send me an email to me<br />
so that we can sort it out on the TeX Live side. Generally the TeX<br />
Live packages are preferred so I will grant access to them to maintainers<br />
that owned the non-TeX Live package variant packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== User Experience ==<br />
<br />
Users could use exactly the part of TeX they need without wasting disc space.<br />
<br />
== Dependencies ==<br />
<br />
# need to do a license audit - done automatically because upstream metadata contains codes for package licenses<br />
# need mass review for all packages before this feature is completed - '''DONE'''<br />
# import of all of the ~1600 packages need to be finished<br />
# all of the packages need to be built<br />
<br />
== Contingency Plan ==<br />
<br />
Stay stuck with TeX Live 2007.<br />
<br />
== Documentation ==<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Release Notes ==<br />
TeX Live 2010 is now introduced with improved packaging scheme that saves download bandwidth and disc size. It is based on upstream packaging metadata and an automated license audit is performed. Packages are now composed from schemes and collections to define a package set user needs to install to use a particular TeX Live feature.<br />
<br />
== Comments and Discussion ==<br />
<br />
* This feature has its own mailing list: [http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/]. Feel free to subscribe and post to this list. <br />
<br />
* See [[Talk:Features/TeXLive]] <!-- This adds a link to the "discussion" tab associated with your page. This provides the ability to have ongoing comments or conversation without bogging down the main feature page --><br />
<br />
[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ru_RU/Features/TeXLive Ru TexLive 2009]</div>Ycdmdjhttps://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Features/TeXLive&diff=218035Features/TeXLive2011-01-29T16:04:35Z<p>Ycdmdj: added stable repository to the section "How to test"</p>
<hr />
<div>= TeX Live 2010 =<br />
<br />
== Summary ==<br />
<br />
Upgrade TeX Live to 2010. Use packaging based on upstream metadata and don't use monolithic build any more.<br />
<br />
== Owner ==<br />
* Name: [[User:jnovy|Jindrich Novy]] jnovy at redhat dot com<br />
<br />
== Current status ==<br />
* Targeted release: [[Releases/15 | Fedora 15]] <br />
* Last updated: 2009-10-22<br />
* Percentage of completion: 60%<br />
<br />
== Detailed Description ==<br />
<br />
TeX Live uses uses its own classification of TeX packages which can be automated and used by packaging systems in various distributions. The packaging metadata that upstream provides allows to distinguish doc, source and runtime files which could then be packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== Benefit to Fedora ==<br />
<br />
A better packaging scheme allows to reduce bandwidth and save significant disc space. It also allows simpler maintenance of separate TeX packages.<br />
<br />
== Scope ==<br />
<br />
Requires packaging or testing and/or enhancements in fedora infrastructure, currently 1627 new packages are to be reviewed and added.<br />
<br />
== How To Test ==<br />
<br />
You have two options. If you prefer to not to have a bleeding edge latest development version of TeX Live (recommended for most users), please follow these repositories:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f13/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc13.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.f14/texlive-release-2010-1.20100720.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
For the latest TeX Live 2011/dev install this repository:<br />
<br />
Fedora 13:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f13-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 14:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f14-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
Fedora 15/rawhide:<br />
# rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-f15-release-2010-1.fc14.noarch.rpm<br />
<br />
The package contains repo file for yum which contains TeX Live with binaries. After installing the release package do:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum install texlive<br />
<br />
if you don't have texlive already installed. Otherwise you can update your old TeX Live 2007 installation like:<br />
<br />
# yum clean all<br />
# yum update<br />
<br />
This will install the basic TeX Live scheme. You can alternatively install any of these schemes:<br />
texlive-scheme-basic<br />
texlive-scheme-context<br />
texlive-scheme-full<br />
texlive-scheme-gust<br />
texlive-scheme-medium<br />
texlive-scheme-minimal<br />
texlive-scheme-tetex<br />
texlive-scheme-xml<br />
<br />
or various pre-set TeX Live collections, the list is here:<br />
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/collections<br />
<br />
You are also able to install a particular style via:<br />
<br />
# yum install 'tex(epsfig.sty)'<br />
<br />
There are possible clashes with applications packaged separately (such as<br />
dvipdfmx, etc.) so we may want to discuss these conflicts with<br />
respective fedora package maintainers to fix them. In case you are a<br />
maintainer of such package please send me an email to me<br />
so that we can sort it out on the TeX Live side. Generally the TeX<br />
Live packages are preferred so I will grant access to them to maintainers<br />
that owned the non-TeX Live package variant packaged separately.<br />
<br />
== User Experience ==<br />
<br />
Users could use exactly the part of TeX they need without wasting disc space.<br />
<br />
== Dependencies ==<br />
<br />
# need to do a license audit - done automatically because upstream metadata contains codes for package licenses<br />
# need mass review for all packages before this feature is completed - '''DONE'''<br />
# import of all of the ~1600 packages need to be finished<br />
# all of the packages need to be built<br />
<br />
== Contingency Plan ==<br />
<br />
Stay stuck with TeX Live 2007.<br />
<br />
== Documentation ==<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Release Notes ==<br />
TeX Live 2010 is now introduced with improved packaging scheme that saves download bandwidth and disc size. It is based on upstream packaging metadata and an automated license audit is performed. Packages are now composed from schemes and collections to define a package set user needs to install to use a particular TeX Live feature.<br />
<br />
== Comments and Discussion ==<br />
<br />
* This feature has its own mailing list: [http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/]. Feel free to subscribe and post to this list. <br />
<br />
* See [[Talk:Features/TeXLive]] <!-- This adds a link to the "discussion" tab associated with your page. This provides the ability to have ongoing comments or conversation without bogging down the main feature page --><br />
<br />
[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ru_RU/Features/TeXLive Ru TexLive 2009]</div>Ycdmdjhttps://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chromium&diff=217925Talk:Chromium2011-01-28T10:50:23Z<p>Ycdmdj: /* Video support */ new section</p>
<hr />
<div>There is an issue involving print dialogs being opened when some sites are visited. After much discussion/testing on this bug: http://goo.gl/8tCg, the problem seems to be with the version being distributed here. Is there a place to submit bugs like this?<br />
<br />
== Video support ==<br />
<br />
Is there a plan for html5 video? It can not really be a problem with ''ogg'' and ''webm''.</div>Ycdmdj