From Fedora Project Wiki
(Testing dashboard and {{ticket|fedora-qa|154}})
 
m (Add date/name to comment)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Testing dashboard and {{ticket|fedora-qa|154}} ==
== Testing dashboard and {{ticket|fedora-qa|154}} ==
 
* [[User:Jlaska|jlaska]] 21:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC) - Heads up, we're currently researching documenting test procedures for a subset of critical path packages.  Our current test management solution uses the fedoraproject.org wiki.  But also under review is transitioning to a more robust test management system to house test documentation and results (see {{ticket|fedora-qa|152}}).  The initial thought is that all test results will be stored in this tool.  However, that doesn't mean we can't have different tools pushing data into this system (e.g. bodhi).  We don't have the details worked out yet, but if test results are being submitted through bodhi, we'll need your help in identifying what access methods bodhi would need to push/pull results from a test case management tool.
Heads up, we're currently researching documenting test procedures for a subset of critical path packages.  Our current test management solution uses the fedoraproject.org wiki.  But also under review is transitioning to a more robust test management system to house test documentation and results (see {{ticket|fedora-qa|152}}).  The initial thought is that all test results will be stored in this tool.  However, that doesn't mean we can't have different tools pushing data into this system (e.g. bodhi).  We don't have the details worked out yet, but if test results are being submitted through bodhi, we'll need your help in identifying what access methods bodhi would need to push/pull results from a test case management tool.

Latest revision as of 21:51, 7 December 2010

Testing dashboard and fedora-qa ticket#154

  • jlaska 21:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC) - Heads up, we're currently researching documenting test procedures for a subset of critical path packages. Our current test management solution uses the fedoraproject.org wiki. But also under review is transitioning to a more robust test management system to house test documentation and results (see fedora-qa ticket#152 ). The initial thought is that all test results will be stored in this tool. However, that doesn't mean we can't have different tools pushing data into this system (e.g. bodhi). We don't have the details worked out yet, but if test results are being submitted through bodhi, we'll need your help in identifying what access methods bodhi would need to push/pull results from a test case management tool.