(re targeting change for F41) |
m (Add release notes) |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Enable bootupd for Fedora | = Enable bootupd for Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT = | ||
== Summary == | |||
By design, ostree does not manage bootloader updates as they can not (yet) happen in a safe fashion. To solve this issue, [https://github.com/coreos/bootupd bootupd] was created. | |||
bootupd is a small program that takes care of updating the bootloader. It currently supports BIOS and EFI booted systems but only rpm-ostree based systems. The updates are triggered by an administrator and are not (yet) automated for safety reasons. | |||
This change is about enabling bootupd integration in Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT to make bootloader updates easier and, hopefully in the future, automated. | |||
bootupd is already used in Fedora CoreOS. | |||
== Owner == | == Owner == | ||
* Name:[[User:Siosm| Timothée Ravier]], [[User:Tpopela| Tomáš Popela]], [[User:Walters| Colin Walters]] | * Name:[[User:Siosm| Timothée Ravier]], [[User:Tpopela| Tomáš Popela]], [[User:Walters| Colin Walters]], [[User: Pwhalen| Paul Whalen]] | ||
* Email: <siosm@fedoraproject.org>, <tpopela@fedoraproject.org>, <walters@fedoraproject.org> | * Email: <siosm@fedoraproject.org>, <tpopela@fedoraproject.org>, <walters@fedoraproject.org>, <pwhalen@fedoraproject.org> | ||
== Current status == | == Current status == | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:ChangeAcceptedF41]] | ||
[[Category:SelfContainedChange]] | [[Category:SelfContainedChange]] | ||
* Targeted release: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f41/ Fedora Linux 41] | * Targeted release: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f41/ Fedora Linux 41] | ||
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line --> {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}} | * Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line --> {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}} | ||
* [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VRJ7CRQUZ7SNEDW4AIOHKKJ7TMPTOX5A/ devel thread] | * [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VRJ7CRQUZ7SNEDW4AIOHKKJ7TMPTOX5A/ devel thread] | ||
* FESCo issue: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2900 #2900] | * FESCo issue: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2900 #2900] | ||
* Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150982 #2150982] | * Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150982 #2150982] | ||
* Release notes tracker: [https:// | * Release notes tracker: [https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/fedora-linux-documentation/release-notes/-/issues/47 #47] | ||
== Detailed Description == | == Detailed Description == | ||
Line 44: | Line 36: | ||
** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127995 | ** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127995 | ||
* We can start planning for the removal of the ostree-grub2 package from the images to solve the "all deployments are shown twice in GRUB" issue. This bug comes from the fact that old GRUB versions that do not have BLS support and we thus can not only rely on BLS support in ostree to generate boot and have to also update the grub configuration for every updates via the scripts in the ostree-grub2 package. This has already (indirectly) caused a major upgrade issue on Silverblue/Kinoite requiring manual interventions from all users. See: | * We can start planning for the removal of the ostree-grub2 package from the images to solve the "all deployments are shown twice in GRUB" issue. This bug comes from the fact that old GRUB versions that do not have BLS support and we thus can not only rely on BLS support in ostree to generate boot and have to also update the grub configuration for every updates via the scripts in the ostree-grub2 package. This has already (indirectly) caused a major upgrade issue on Silverblue/Kinoite/IoT requiring manual interventions from all users. See: | ||
** https://fedoramagazine.org/manual-action-required-to-update-fedora-silverblue-kinoite-and-iot-version-36/ | ** https://fedoramagazine.org/manual-action-required-to-update-fedora-silverblue-kinoite-and-iot-version-36/ | ||
** https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/120 | ** https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/120 | ||
Line 53: | Line 45: | ||
Also note that this change currently relies on the image being composed via rpm-ostree in unified core, which is the subject of the following change also proposed for Fedora 38: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueUnifiedCore | Also note that this change currently relies on the image being composed via rpm-ostree in unified core, which is the subject of the following change also proposed for Fedora 38: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueUnifiedCore | ||
Progress on this change is tracked in: https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/1. | |||
== Feedback == | == Feedback == | ||
> What's the plan to apply the outstanding security updates (shim, grub2, and dbx push from June) to fedora silverblue 36 + 37 that aren't covered by this change? | |||
We will not backport this change to a previous Fedora release. | |||
Users that need to update their bootloader can do so manually using the instructions from the [https://fedoramagazine.org/manual-action-needed-to-resolve-boot-failure-for-fedora-atomic-desktops-and-fedora-iot/ Manual action needed to resolve boot failure for Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT] Fedora Magazine article. | |||
< | <s>We'll try to backport as much as possible of this change to Fedora 37 and Fedora 36 to let users updates their bootloaders. If we require Anaconda changes (unlikely but not 100% sure at the time this is written) then those changes will not be backported as we don't respin the installer ISOs.</s> | ||
== Benefit to Fedora == | == Benefit to Fedora == | ||
Fedora | Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT users can easily do bootloaders updates (that includes security fixes) and we can remove support for legacy GRUB versions thus simplify the upgrade process and making it more reliable. | ||
== Scope == | == Scope == | ||
Line 110: | Line 77: | ||
== How To Test == | == How To Test == | ||
We will extend the test instructions once the unified core changes have landed. You can follow: https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/120 and https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/355. | On a system with bootupd installed (i.e. a version of Fedora with this change included), run: | ||
<pre> | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl adopt-and-update | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl validate | |||
</pre> | |||
Your bootloader should now be updated. | |||
New systems directly installed from a version with this change can directly do an update: | |||
<pre> | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl update | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl validate | |||
</pre> | |||
On systems updated from previous Fedora releases, there may be validation errors as some components (the 32 bits variants) are missing as they were not installed by Anaconda in the past. This can be safely ignored: | |||
<pre> | |||
$ sudo bootupctl validate | |||
Removed: BOOT/fbia32.efi | |||
Removed: BOOT/fbx64.efi | |||
Removed: fedora/grubia32.efi | |||
Removed: fedora/BOOTIA32.CSV | |||
Removed: fedora/shimia32.efi | |||
Removed: fedora/mmia32.efi | |||
Removed: BOOT/BOOTIA32.EFI | |||
error: Caught validation errors | |||
</pre> | |||
To test the initial adoption and update again, you can remove `/boot/bootupd-state.json` and try again: | |||
<pre> | |||
$ sudo rm /boot/bootupd-state.json | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl update | |||
$ sudo bootupctl status | |||
$ sudo bootupctl validate | |||
</pre> | |||
Until we get [https://github.com/coreos/bootupd/issues/707 #707] ([https://github.com/coreos/bootupd/pull/715 PR#715]), you will have to manually reset the systemd unit in case of failures: | |||
<pre> | |||
$ sudo systemctl reset-failed bootupd.service | |||
</pre> | |||
<s>We will extend the test instructions once the unified core changes have landed. You can follow: https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/120 and https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/355.</s> | |||
== User Experience == | == User Experience == | ||
For now, users will have to update their bootloader manually via the command line. Integration to GNOME Software and Plasma Discover might be interesting to make that easier. | For now, users will have to update their bootloader manually via the command line. <s>Integration to GNOME Software and Plasma Discover might be interesting to make that easier.</s> | ||
<s>Once the fallback EFI feature is available in shim (and support implemented in bootupd), we can consider implementing automated updates.</s> | |||
Once the | Once the remaining issues listed in https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/1 are resolved, we will enabled automatic bootloader updates. | ||
== Dependencies == | == Dependencies == | ||
Line 125: | Line 144: | ||
* Contingency mechanism: Revert the change in the rpm-ostree manifests. Owners will do it. Nothing to do for users. | * Contingency mechanism: Revert the change in the rpm-ostree manifests. Owners will do it. Nothing to do for users. | ||
* Contingency deadline: | * Contingency deadline: Before final freeze as this change needs to be included in the installation ISOs as Anaconda behaves differently if bootupd is included or not in the installed system. | ||
* Blocks release? No | * Blocks release? No | ||
== Documentation == | == Documentation == | ||
We will write docs to let users update their bootloaders manually. They will look very similar to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/bootloader-updates/. | <s>We will write docs to let users update their bootloaders manually. They will look very similar to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/bootloader-updates/.</s> | ||
We don't need specific documentation anymore for that as we enabled bootloader updates by default. | |||
== Release Notes == | == Release Notes == | ||
On Atomic Desktops, the bootloader is now automatically updated using bootupd. New systems are now installed with a static GRUB configuration which relies only on the Boot Loader Specification configuration files and is not regenerated for each update. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 24 October 2024
Enable bootupd for Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT
Summary
By design, ostree does not manage bootloader updates as they can not (yet) happen in a safe fashion. To solve this issue, bootupd was created.
bootupd is a small program that takes care of updating the bootloader. It currently supports BIOS and EFI booted systems but only rpm-ostree based systems. The updates are triggered by an administrator and are not (yet) automated for safety reasons.
This change is about enabling bootupd integration in Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT to make bootloader updates easier and, hopefully in the future, automated.
bootupd is already used in Fedora CoreOS.
Owner
- Name: Timothée Ravier, Tomáš Popela, Colin Walters, Paul Whalen
- Email: <siosm@fedoraproject.org>, <tpopela@fedoraproject.org>, <walters@fedoraproject.org>, <pwhalen@fedoraproject.org>
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 41
- Last updated: 2024-10-24
- devel thread
- FESCo issue: #2900
- Tracker bug: #2150982
- Release notes tracker: #47
Detailed Description
Adding full bootupd support has two immediate benefits:
- User will be able to easily update the bootloader on their system. This will let them apply Secure Boot dbx updates that block old bootloaders with known vulnerabilities from loading. See:
- We can start planning for the removal of the ostree-grub2 package from the images to solve the "all deployments are shown twice in GRUB" issue. This bug comes from the fact that old GRUB versions that do not have BLS support and we thus can not only rely on BLS support in ostree to generate boot and have to also update the grub configuration for every updates via the scripts in the ostree-grub2 package. This has already (indirectly) caused a major upgrade issue on Silverblue/Kinoite/IoT requiring manual interventions from all users. See:
Note that we can not yet enable unattended bootloader updates as even though bootupd tries hard to make those updates as safe as possible, it is currently not possible that they are safe if the system crashes (or loses power) at the wrong time. The following change in shim (https://github.com/rhboot/shim/pull/502) should help with that.
Thus bootloaders updates will remain a manually user triggered operation for now.
Also note that this change currently relies on the image being composed via rpm-ostree in unified core, which is the subject of the following change also proposed for Fedora 38: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraSilverblueUnifiedCore
Progress on this change is tracked in: https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/1.
Feedback
> What's the plan to apply the outstanding security updates (shim, grub2, and dbx push from June) to fedora silverblue 36 + 37 that aren't covered by this change?
We will not backport this change to a previous Fedora release.
Users that need to update their bootloader can do so manually using the instructions from the Manual action needed to resolve boot failure for Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT Fedora Magazine article.
We'll try to backport as much as possible of this change to Fedora 37 and Fedora 36 to let users updates their bootloaders. If we require Anaconda changes (unlikely but not 100% sure at the time this is written) then those changes will not be backported as we don't respin the installer ISOs.
Benefit to Fedora
Fedora Atomic Desktops and Fedora IoT users can easily do bootloaders updates (that includes security fixes) and we can remove support for legacy GRUB versions thus simplify the upgrade process and making it more reliable.
Scope
- Proposal owners: Testing of the integration and new builds. The code changes are mostly done and the integration changes are mostly already ready as bootupd has already been integrated in a similar fashion in Fedora CoreOS.
- Other developers: N/A
- Release engineering: N/A
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Alignment with Objectives: N/A
Upgrade/compatibility impact
There should be not visible change for users when upgrading. The change only impacts the way the images are composed on the server.
How To Test
On a system with bootupd installed (i.e. a version of Fedora with this change included), run:
$ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl adopt-and-update $ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl validate
Your bootloader should now be updated.
New systems directly installed from a version with this change can directly do an update:
$ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl update $ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl validate
On systems updated from previous Fedora releases, there may be validation errors as some components (the 32 bits variants) are missing as they were not installed by Anaconda in the past. This can be safely ignored:
$ sudo bootupctl validate Removed: BOOT/fbia32.efi Removed: BOOT/fbx64.efi Removed: fedora/grubia32.efi Removed: fedora/BOOTIA32.CSV Removed: fedora/shimia32.efi Removed: fedora/mmia32.efi Removed: BOOT/BOOTIA32.EFI error: Caught validation errors
To test the initial adoption and update again, you can remove /boot/bootupd-state.json
and try again:
$ sudo rm /boot/bootupd-state.json $ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl update $ sudo bootupctl status $ sudo bootupctl validate
Until we get #707 (PR#715), you will have to manually reset the systemd unit in case of failures:
$ sudo systemctl reset-failed bootupd.service
We will extend the test instructions once the unified core changes have landed. You can follow: https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/120 and https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/355.
User Experience
For now, users will have to update their bootloader manually via the command line. Integration to GNOME Software and Plasma Discover might be interesting to make that easier.
Once the fallback EFI feature is available in shim (and support implemented in bootupd), we can consider implementing automated updates.
Once the remaining issues listed in https://gitlab.com/fedora/ostree/sig/-/issues/1 are resolved, we will enabled automatic bootloader updates.
Dependencies
N/A
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: Revert the change in the rpm-ostree manifests. Owners will do it. Nothing to do for users.
- Contingency deadline: Before final freeze as this change needs to be included in the installation ISOs as Anaconda behaves differently if bootupd is included or not in the installed system.
- Blocks release? No
Documentation
We will write docs to let users update their bootloaders manually. They will look very similar to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/bootloader-updates/.
We don't need specific documentation anymore for that as we enabled bootloader updates by default.
Release Notes
On Atomic Desktops, the bootloader is now automatically updated using bootupd. New systems are now installed with a static GRUB configuration which relies only on the Boot Loader Specification configuration files and is not regenerated for each update.