From Fedora Project Wiki
(new package requests)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{admon/important | Reconsider This Page| This is not a good way to create processes and steps that are easy to follow.  It does not scale to create special opt-outs for individual maintainers, etc.  This information should be merged into the overall instructions for triaging bugs rather than requiring new triagers to go to yet ''one more page'' to figure out what they are and are not supposed to do [[User:Poelstra|poelcat]] 17:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)}}
This is a page designed to hold special procedures for the BugZappers to follow when triaging bugs.
This is a page designed to hold special procedures for the BugZappers to follow when triaging bugs.



Revision as of 17:18, 25 February 2009

Reconsider This Page
This is not a good way to create processes and steps that are easy to follow. It does not scale to create special opt-outs for individual maintainers, etc. This information should be merged into the overall instructions for triaging bugs rather than requiring new triagers to go to yet one more page to figure out what they are and are not supposed to do poelcat 17:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

This is a page designed to hold special procedures for the BugZappers to follow when triaging bugs.

  • Please do not triage bugs filed against the "Package Review" component, which usually have "Merge review" in the summary. These are handled as part of the Package Review Process.
  • Requests for new packages to be added to Fedora should be closed NOTABUG and added to the Package maintainers wishlist. See the stock response.
  • Please do not triage bugs for packages owned by Steve Grubb