From Fedora Project Wiki

m (internal link cleaning)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
== Setting Strategy ==
== Setting Strategy ==


* Work on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Poelstra/Importance_of_strategy
* Work on: [[User:Poelstra/Importance_of_strategy]]
* Why the Fedora the Board (and this workgroup) are pursuing these strategic issuses and the benefits that will result to Fedora from investing time in them.
* Why the Fedora the Board (and this workgroup) are pursuing these strategic issuses and the benefits that will result to Fedora from investing time in them.
* Added a new section with latest iteration: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Poelstra/Importance_of_strategy#2010-02-01
* Added a new section with latest iteration: [[User:Poelstra/Importance_of_strategy#2010-02-01]]
* NEXT ACTIONS: John to propose to full board for acceptance
* NEXT ACTIONS: John to propose to full board for acceptance


== Individual Progress Updates ==
== Individual Progress Updates ==
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Unfinished_Board_issues
* [[Unfinished_Board_issues]]


=== Mike ===
=== Mike ===
Line 32: Line 32:
=== Colin ===  
=== Colin ===  
* working on Spins questions and starting wiki pages
* working on Spins questions and starting wiki pages
* will link pages into https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Unfinished_Board_issues
* will link pages into [[Unfinished_Board_issues]]


=== John ===
=== John ===

Latest revision as of 08:33, 18 September 2016

Roll Call

  • Attendees: Mike McGrath, John Poelstra, Colin Walters, Paul Frields, Colin Walters
  • Regrets: Chris Tyler, Matt Domsch

Previous Meeting

Setting Strategy

Individual Progress Updates

Mike

  • Did some research and work on crowdsourcing as it related to the question of "1,000 contributors"
    • Does answering the pros/cons of crowdsourcing really help us?
    • Cons: Can add cost to the project
      • For Fedora -- gets done less efficiently, possibly?
    • Is the end product higher or lower quality?
  • Seemed like a good question at the time, do not see need to pursue further--mike will add reasoning and bullets and close out topic

Paul

  • working on default offering question and spins
  • next: Go to Spins SIG and ask some pointed questions about default offering
    • on what basis do you think the Project would decide to change?
  • Next meeting will have Default offering page written up for review and discussion

Colin

John

  • Worked on personas and target audience page
  • Linked in some pages
  • Next meeting will have Personas page written up for review and discussion

Meeting Quality

  • John raised question of meeting quality and format and if people felt that the meetings were working
  • Everyone present felt that the meetings were working fine and no changes were needed at this time

Next Meeting

  • February 8, 2010 @ 15:00 EST