Search results

[[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] reported that he had built the new version of autotest for .../ref> to reduce the download weight of nightly Rawhide live images. [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] and [[User:Adamwill|Adam Williamson]] did not think it woul

...op to close any bugs filed by people using something else WONTFIX." [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] and [[User:Skvidal|Seth Vidal]] seemed<ref>http://www.redha ...86 compat tree and having it available like secondary arches are." [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-l

[[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]] announced<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/deve ...s.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089801.html</ref> and [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]]<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-Marc

| style="color: #407a40" | Proposal: jkeating will post to $somewhere asking for a discussion on the F11 schedule, provid

; Owner - [[User:jkeating]] : Jkeating asked the group if a Fedora Knowledge Base would be useful to your efforts?

...ek, 2010-01-21 was the first pre-Alpha rawhide acceptance test milestone. Jkeating worked around a glibc bug by including the previous build. Install images | style="color: #818144" | yup, so jkeating was able to pull an install source together and work around the glibc bug

(10:12:09 AM) warren: jeremy and jkeating are in private meetings explaining all this with management. I am not priv

[13:05] <notting> ausil,jkeating,jwboyer,katzj,mikeb,mmcgrath,notting,petersen,wtogami

[[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]] outlined<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-l ...User:Poelstra|John Poelstra]] and [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]]. [[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]] argued<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-lis

#* Jkeating took an action item to update the ticket so Liam can proceed with community ...ps://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=514062 medium, low, ---, jkeating, CLOSED RAWHIDE, Rawhide missing images

...ts.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-July/092152.html</ref> and [[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]]<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-July

''Contacts:'' jkeating [AT]redhat [DOT] com ''Mentor(s):'' [[User:jkeating]] - Mentor

[[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]] is stepping down<ref>http://jkeating.livejournal.com/78218.html</ref> from the role of lead release engineer for

** bcl, jkeating and jlaska confirmed the change in behavior after the meeting * Jkeating received reports about missing *-firmware packages on live images

<warren> rvokal had a long talk with jkeating on the topic

[[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]] announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announc ...[User:Jwboyer|Josh Boyer]] responded that it was because one human ([[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]]) had to sign the packages and he had been also busy getting

[[User:Jkeating|Jesse Keating]]<ref>Jesse Keating</ref> announced<ref>http://lists.fedorapr ...He also noted that Bodhi is supposed to reject un-signed packages. [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] explained<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test

[[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] proposed a talk during FUDCon to explain how several new id

...both appearing to have been fixed. On overall readiness, James and [[User:jkeating|Jesse Keating]] reported that the installer seems to be in good shape, but

| style="color: #488888" | from discussion with jlaska and jkeating I changed a few definitions