Search results

[[Packaging:Guidelines#Tags]] This draft is not ready, yet. It is currently be worked on by [[User:Till|Till Maas].

...evisions since import from moinmoin but also do not appear in the existing guidelines. If dropped or rejected, they should be archived. If active they should be |[[PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires]]|| Explicit Requires packaging guideline modifications || added || In progress

= BuildRoot Guidelines = '''Initial Draft:''' Thursday October 26, 2017<BR>

{{Draft}} No formal guidelines exist. "Best practices" at [[SIGs/KDE#Best_Practices]]

= Upstream Versioning Recommendation (Draft) = While [[Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Version|Packaging Guidelines]] describes these cases in great detail, here we outline an abstract of the

= Improved Ivy Packaging = This change aims at improving the way of packaging Java software, which uses Apache Ivy to manage build dependencies.

== Things to be considered for Packaging Guidelines == ...aScript||abadger1999|| Discuss||[[JavaScript libraries packaging guideline draft]] Libraries Packaged. See discussion page for Unresolved Issues

{{admon/warning|This is a DRAFT}} Many of these packages were created before the current packaging guidelines were in place, or before some features were available in rpm or our build s

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-05-06} === * A new draft this week.

{{Draft}} Following change to Packaging Guidelines is proposed: Add a section '''Use of Hard Links''' which would read:

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-02-12} === * Guidelines for packages using ggc-client-libs

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-18} === No new guidelines this week.

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-11} === No new guidelines this week.

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-12-04} === The following draft has been accepted by FESCO and is to be written into the guidelines:

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-12} === * OCaml guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml

...wer performs for each review and building guideline checks for all Package guidelines which can be automated. ...s(very much obviously) running rpmlint on input files. We plan to push all guidelines checks to upstream rpmlint. But there are some hybrid checks which:

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-25} === No new guidelines this week.

{{draft}} [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of 2007.04.17 === the guidelines:

'''NOTE:''' This is a draft, and needs a lot of fleshing out -- if people would rather it live somewher See [[Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering]] for more detail.