From Fedora Project Wiki

  • My suggestion for this draft would be to specify submodules manually. Especially because some submodule ...ecause of the manual nature of the Requires, the pythonegg portion of this draft still has benefits.
    2 KB (353 words) - 16:13, 14 April 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-05-08} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    10 KB (1,536 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • {{admon/warning|Draft|This document is only a draft! It shouldn't actively harm anything to follow what's presented here, plea ...some cases that's because there is no point in prescribing every detail of packaging, and in some cases there simply is no agreement about how something should
    5 KB (839 words) - 23:34, 20 February 2017
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-07-10} === No proposals were submitted to FESCo last week, so no new guidelines this week.
    16 KB (2,311 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of 2007.04.03 === The following draft has been accepted by FESCO and is to be written into
    9 KB (1,302 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-04} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    11 KB (1,689 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-06-02 === ...uld like to see this formulated as a guideline change (indicating what the guidelines and relevant specfile templates would look like after the change) and not a
    14 KB (1,858 words) - 20:18, 4 June 2009
  • Cloned from ["Packaging/ReviewGuidelines"] . = Package Review Guidelines =
    15 KB (2,502 words) - 19:52, 13 August 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-04-24} === the guidelines:
    18 KB (2,684 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-02-03 === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    38 KB (4,928 words) - 19:15, 5 February 2009
  • == Packaging Guidelines for EPEL5 == {{draft}}
    5 KB (763 words) - 16:54, 7 December 2011
  • ...tory). This has to be done in sync with JRuby related changes to packaging guidelines. === New Packaging Guidelines ===
    8 KB (1,291 words) - 04:09, 9 November 2013
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-05-22} === * Tweaks to static library packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryChanges
    19 KB (2,759 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • * New Packaging Guidelines for Ruby packages (gems and extension libraries) * Changes to the location of files to comply with FHS, multilib and packaging standards
    9 KB (1,410 words) - 04:13, 9 November 2013
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-19} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    15 KB (2,155 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-05} === * OCaml guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml
    14 KB (1,980 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • = Adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines = The [[PackagingDrafts/Go| current Go packaging guidelines]] have been in a draft
    6 KB (940 words) - 17:25, 9 July 2019
  • ...packages into Fedora. This requires the specs to meet the Fedora Packaging Guidelines, be submitted for Review Request, reviewed and accepted into Fedora. * Fedora Musicians' Guide: currently in draft stage, this new guide will be published with Fedora 14. Testing and proof-
    2 KB (251 words) - 21:31, 17 September 2016
  • {{draft}} [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]
    2 KB (277 words) - 15:19, 29 June 2011
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-26} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    19 KB (2,793 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)