From Fedora Project Wiki
- {{draft}} [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] ...1 KB (170 words) - 17:11, 8 March 2023
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of 2007.04.17 === the guidelines: ...19 KB (2,703 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- '''This draft document is obsolete. The approved JPackage adoption guidelines are found here: [wiki:Self:Packaging/JPackagePolicy Subrelease Packaging Guidelines for JPackage RPMS] ''' ...9 KB (1,537 words) - 21:03, 21 February 2009
- ==MinGW Repository Draft== ...GW SIG is charged with outlining the policies which will be used to handle packaging for the repository. ...4 KB (697 words) - 21:56, 5 September 2008
- '''NOTE:''' This is a draft, and needs a lot of fleshing out -- if people would rather it live somewher See [[Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering]] for more detail. ...2 KB (313 words) - 21:24, 3 August 2015
- My suggestion for this draft would be to specify submodules manually. Especially because some submodule ...ecause of the manual nature of the Requires, the pythonegg portion of this draft still has benefits. ...2 KB (353 words) - 16:13, 14 April 2009
- [[Dec 05 11:02:46] <spot> i'm here, just finishing up this conflicts draft [[Dec 05 11:03:35] <rdieter> +1 to whatever spot has in his Conflicts draft. (: ...5 KB (671 words) - 18:52, 17 February 2010
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-05-08} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines: ...10 KB (1,536 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- {{draft| To be added to [[Packaging:ScriptletSnippets]]}} To be added to [[Packaging:ScriptletSnippets]] after the Syntax Ordering section. ...3 KB (469 words) - 17:32, 4 January 2012
- {{admon/warning|Draft|This document is only a draft! It shouldn't actively harm anything to follow what's presented here, plea ...some cases that's because there is no point in prescribing every detail of packaging, and in some cases there simply is no agreement about how something should ...5 KB (839 words) - 23:34, 20 February 2017
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-07-10} === No proposals were submitted to FESCo last week, so no new guidelines this week. ...16 KB (2,311 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-04} === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines: ...11 KB (1,689 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of 2007.04.03 === The following draft has been accepted by FESCO and is to be written into ...9 KB (1,302 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
- {{admon/warning|This is only a DRAFT!}} = Guidelines for packaging Drupal 7 modules and themes = ...9 KB (1,197 words) - 15:34, 17 February 2014
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-06-02 === ...uld like to see this formulated as a guideline change (indicating what the guidelines and relevant specfile templates would look like after the change) and not a ...14 KB (1,858 words) - 20:18, 4 June 2009
- Cloned from ["Packaging/ReviewGuidelines"] . = Package Review Guidelines = ...15 KB (2,502 words) - 19:52, 13 August 2008
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-04-24} === the guidelines: ...18 KB (2,684 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-02-03 === ...ollowing drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines: ...38 KB (4,928 words) - 19:15, 5 February 2009
- == Packaging Guidelines for EPEL5 == {{draft}} ...5 KB (763 words) - 16:54, 7 December 2011
- {{draft}} New section for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout See: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/314 ...2 KB (369 words) - 20:48, 17 July 2013