From Fedora Project Wiki

(initial page creation)
 
m (→‎Layout: fix markup)
Line 11: Line 11:


== Layout ==
== Layout ==
All .py/.pyo/.pyc files need to be below
All .py/.pyo/.pyc files outside of a python runtime package need to be below <code>/usr/lib/python$MAJOR-$MINOR/site-packages</code>
  /usr/lib/python$MAJOR-$MINOR/site-packages
 
for example, below:
For example, python code for the 3.1 runtime needs to be below <code>/usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages</code>
  /usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages


== .pyo/.pyc files ==
== .pyo/.pyc files ==

Revision as of 22:07, 23 October 2009

Packaging Python modules for Python 3

I hope to add a parallel-installable Python 3 stack to Fedora 13.

See the feature page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13 and also this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00054.html

This requires us to come up with a sane way to package Python 3 modules.

Naming

(to be written)

Layout

All .py/.pyo/.pyc files outside of a python runtime package need to be below /usr/lib/python$MAJOR-$MINOR/site-packages

For example, python code for the 3.1 runtime needs to be below /usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages

.pyo/.pyc files

Compiled .pyo/.pyc files embed a magic number, indicating which python version they are for; python libraries have a corresponding magic number.

Proposal rule: All .pyo/.pyc files below /usr/lib/python$MAJOR.$MINOR must have a magic number corresponding to that for /usr/bin/python$MAJOR.$MINOR

Thus e.g.

 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/libxml2.pyc

must have the same magic number as that of

 /usr/bin/python2.6

Similarly,

 /usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages/libxml2.pyc

must have the same magic number as that of

 /usr/bin/python3.1