From Fedora Project Wiki

(New page: Brain dump. Comments welcome and appreciated, on the talk page. = Current Flaws= = Needed = # Understands "use base", "use parent", etc, constructs. # Understands Moose ## "extends" - ...)
 
(→‎Needed: add catalyst, metaclass)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
# Understands "use base", "use parent", etc, constructs.
 
# Understands "use base", "use parent", etc, constructs.
# Understands Moose
+
# Understands [[Moose]]
 
## "extends" - subclassing
 
## "extends" - subclassing
 
## "with" - roles
 
## "with" - roles
 +
## "metaclass" - metaclasses
 
## "traits" - metaclass roles
 
## "traits" - metaclass roles
 +
# Understands [[Catalyst]] plugin speficication syntax
 +
#* This should be extensible to other module classes
 
# Doesn't generate duplicates.  e.g.: perl(Foo) and perl(Foo) >= 1.9
 
# Doesn't generate duplicates.  e.g.: perl(Foo) and perl(Foo) >= 1.9
 
# Better able to deal with the wonders of Perl versioning; e.g.
 
# Better able to deal with the wonders of Perl versioning; e.g.

Revision as of 19:06, 17 February 2009

Brain dump. Comments welcome and appreciated, on the talk page.

Current Flaws

Needed

  1. Understands "use base", "use parent", etc, constructs.
  2. Understands Moose
    1. "extends" - subclassing
    2. "with" - roles
    3. "metaclass" - metaclasses
    4. "traits" - metaclass roles
  3. Understands Catalyst plugin speficication syntax
    • This should be extensible to other module classes
  4. Doesn't generate duplicates. e.g.: perl(Foo) and perl(Foo) >= 1.9
  5. Better able to deal with the wonders of Perl versioning; e.g.
    • 1.20a stays 1.20a
    • 1.20 becomes 1.020000 (version triplet)

Questions

  1. Should we attempt to compile? (a la perl -wc or Module::ScanDeps)
    • PROS: highly accurate
    • CONS: may fail for a variety of reasons
  2. Should we try to normalize the versions?