From Fedora Project Wiki
(Rewrite description)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
* Email: msimacek@redhat.com
* Email: msimacek@redhat.com
* Email: mizdebsk@redhat.com
* Email: mizdebsk@redhat.com
* Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> -->
* Release notes owner: <!--- To be assigned by docs team [[User:FASAccountName| Release notes owner name]] <email address> -->[mailto:sclark@fedoraproject.org Simon Clark] ([[User:sclark|sclark]])
<!--- UNCOMMENT only for Changes with assigned Shepherd (by FESCo)
<!--- UNCOMMENT only for Changes with assigned Shepherd (by FESCo)
* FESCo shepherd: [[User:FASAccountName| Shehperd name]] <email address>
* FESCo shepherd: [[User:FASAccountName| Shehperd name]] <email address>
Line 56: Line 56:
CLOSED as NEXTRELEASE -> change is completed and verified and will be delivered in next release under development
CLOSED as NEXTRELEASE -> change is completed and verified and will be delivered in next release under development
-->
-->
* Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
* Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474878 #1474878]


== Detailed Description ==
== Detailed Description ==
Line 70: Line 70:
* if the current environment contains JAVA_HOME variable (typically it doesn't), JVM executable is looked up there
* if the current environment contains JAVA_HOME variable (typically it doesn't), JVM executable is looked up there
* if the configuration specifies JAVA_HOME (by default it doesn't), JVM is looked up there
* if the configuration specifies JAVA_HOME (by default it doesn't), JVM is looked up there
* otherwise JVM executable is looked up on PATH, using `which java`. With default PATH setting on Fedora, this will be /usr/bin/java, which is a symlink managed by alternatives
* it tries to find JVM in java/jre subdirs of JVM_ROOT (by default /usr/lib/jvm). Those subdirs are managed by "jre"/"java_sdk" alternatives. This is the code path that is triggered by default. The /usr/lib/jvm alternative symlink is a slave of "java" configuration, so changing "java" alternatives will set it to different value or unset it, if the alternative provider doesn't specify the slave configuration.
* otherwise JVM executable is looked up on PATH, using `which java`. With default PATH setting on Fedora, this will be /usr/bin/java, which is a symlink managed by "java" alternatives setting


=== Disadvantages of the current behavior ===
=== Disadvantages of the current behavior ===
Let's say a user wants to change his java command to a different provider,
Let's say a user wants to change his java command to a different provider,
because he needs to run an application that requires a different JDK
because he needs to run an application that requires a different JDK. He does this using
(probably legacy). He either does this system-wide and permanently using
alternatives (needs root), changing the provider of "java".
alternatives (needs root), or temporarily by placing java command of the
This will not only change what /usr/bin/java points to, but because "jre" and "java_sdk" alternatives settings are defined as slave,
desired provider on PATH. Now, when he runs any java application
it will also change the JVM system applications are run with.
in the system installed from RPM, such application will be run with the
Now, when he runs any java application
JVM that was put on PATH, not with the Fedora-supported one. The user might
in the system installed from RPM, such application will be run with the JVM set in alternatives,
not realize that the application is written in Java and the application may
not with the Fedora-supported one.
The user might not realize that the application is written in Java and the application may
not behave correctly if it's not compatible with given JVM (i.e. a legacy one).
not behave correctly if it's not compatible with given JVM (i.e. a legacy one).
Also, the current behavior is not consistent with what other language stacks do in Fedora. Scripting
languages mostly use absolute paths to interpreters in script shebangs to
ensure that those scripts are run by the intended interpreter. The current
behavior of JVM lookup can be compared to using /usr/bin/env in shebangs,
which is generally avoided in Fedora-packaged software.


=== Proposed behavior ===
=== Proposed behavior ===
Line 97: Line 93:
which is a symlink pointing to latest version of openjdk 8, provided by
which is a symlink pointing to latest version of openjdk 8, provided by
java-1.8.0-openjdk package.
java-1.8.0-openjdk package.
PATH won't be considered anymore. The system administrator would still be able
The system administrator would still be able
to change the default system-wide JVM for applications in java.conf
to change the default system-wide JVM for applications in java.conf
configuration file. Temporary changes of JVM would still be possible using
configuration file. Temporary changes of JVM would still be possible using
Line 106: Line 102:


== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Users will be able to change their java command (via PATH or alternatives)
Users (system administrators) will be able to change their java command without the risk of impacting system-wide applications installed from RPMs.
without the risk of impacting system-wide applications installed from RPMs.
    
    
<!-- What is the benefit to the platform?  If this is a major capability update, what has changed?  If this is a new functionality, what capabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
<!-- What is the benefit to the platform?  If this is a major capability update, what has changed?  If this is a new functionality, what capabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this proposal?-->
Line 189: Line 184:
-->
-->


[[Category:ChangeReadyForFesco]]
[[Category:ChangeAcceptedF27]]
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->

Latest revision as of 19:55, 26 October 2017


Decouple system java setting from java command setting

Summary

By default, Java applications installed from RPMs are run with JVM found on PATH. We propose to run them with default system JVM, not considering PATH. Users will still be able to override the default using JAVA_HOME environment variable as before.

Owner

Current status

Detailed Description

Java applications are not directly executable and thus they typically ship a launcher script that performs the lookup of the JVM executable used to run the application and setups its environment. In Fedora, applications packaged as RPMs ship launcher scripts (most commonly generated using %jpackage_script macro) that delegate the setup to helper routines provided by javapackages-tools.

Currently (Fedora 26), the lookup of a JVM by javapackages-tools works as follows:

  • it reads java.conf configuration file from config paths (default /etc/java/java.conf)
  • if the current environment contains JAVA_HOME variable (typically it doesn't), JVM executable is looked up there
  • if the configuration specifies JAVA_HOME (by default it doesn't), JVM is looked up there
  • it tries to find JVM in java/jre subdirs of JVM_ROOT (by default /usr/lib/jvm). Those subdirs are managed by "jre"/"java_sdk" alternatives. This is the code path that is triggered by default. The /usr/lib/jvm alternative symlink is a slave of "java" configuration, so changing "java" alternatives will set it to different value or unset it, if the alternative provider doesn't specify the slave configuration.
  • otherwise JVM executable is looked up on PATH, using which java. With default PATH setting on Fedora, this will be /usr/bin/java, which is a symlink managed by "java" alternatives setting

Disadvantages of the current behavior

Let's say a user wants to change his java command to a different provider, because he needs to run an application that requires a different JDK. He does this using alternatives (needs root), changing the provider of "java". This will not only change what /usr/bin/java points to, but because "jre" and "java_sdk" alternatives settings are defined as slave, it will also change the JVM system applications are run with. Now, when he runs any java application in the system installed from RPM, such application will be run with the JVM set in alternatives, not with the Fedora-supported one. The user might not realize that the application is written in Java and the application may not behave correctly if it's not compatible with given JVM (i.e. a legacy one).

Proposed behavior

If JAVA_HOME is not set (neither in the environment, nor in configuration), it is set to a default value that points to the currently supported default Java implementation. The default would be stored in javapackages-tools (the package providing the lookup functions). For Fedora 27, this would be /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk, which is a symlink pointing to latest version of openjdk 8, provided by java-1.8.0-openjdk package. The system administrator would still be able to change the default system-wide JVM for applications in java.conf configuration file. Temporary changes of JVM would still be possible using JAVA_HOME environment variable.

The change would be implemented by altering the lookup functions in javapackages-tools and updating the package in Fedora. Note that we (the change owners) are both upstream and Fedora maintainers of javapackages-tools.


Benefit to Fedora

Users (system administrators) will be able to change their java command without the risk of impacting system-wide applications installed from RPMs.


Scope

  • Proposal owners:
    • Adjust javapackages-tools to provide default Java setting in /etc/java/java.conf
  • Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Release engineering: [1] (a check of an impact with Release Engeneering is needed)
  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

Upgrade/compatibility impact

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

How To Test

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

User Experience

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Dependencies

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: revert to using single alternatives provider
  • Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Blocks release? No

Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes