- 1 Standard Discovery, Staging and Invocation of Integration Tests
Standard Discovery, Staging and Invocation of Integration Tests
Lets define a clear delineation of between a test suite (including framework) and the CI system that is running the test suite. This is the standard interface.
What follows is a standard way to discover, package and invoke integration tests for a package stored in a Fedora dist-git repo.
Many Fedora packages have unit tests. These tests are typically run during a
%check RPM build step and run in a build root. On the other hand, integration testing should happen against a composed system. Upstream projects have integration tests, both Fedora QA and the Atomic Host team would like to create more integration tests, Red Hat would like to bring integration tests upstream.
- Name: Stef Walter
- Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Name: Pierre-Yves Chibon
- Email: email@example.com
- Test Subject: The items that are to be tested.
- Examples: RPMs, OCI image, ISO, QCow2, Module repository ...
- Test: A callable/runnable piece of code and corresponding test data and mocks which exercises and evaluates a test subject.
- Test Suite: The collection of all tests that apply to a test subject.
- Test Framework: A library or component that the test suite and tests use to accomplish their job.
- Test Result: A boolean pass/fail output of a test suite.
- Test results are for consumption by automated aspects of a testing systems.
- Test Artifact: Any additional output of the test suite such as the stdout/stderr output, log files, screenshots, core dumps, or TAP/Junit/subunit streams.
- Test artifacts are for consumption by humans, archival or big data analysis.
- Testing System: A CI or other testing system that would like to discover, stage and invoke tests for a test subject.
The testing system is responsible to:
- Build or otherwise acquire the test subject, such as package, container image, tree …
- Decide which test suite to run, often by using the standard interface to discover appropriate tests for the dist-git repo that a test subject originated in.
- Schedule, provision or orchestrate a job to run the test suite on appropriate compute, storage, ...
- Stage the test suite as described by the standard interface.
- Invoke the test suite as described by the standard interface.
- Gather the test results and test artifacts as described by the standard interface.
- Announce and relay the test results and test artifacts for gating, archival ...
The standard interface describes how to:
- Discover a test suite for a given dist-git repo.
- Uniquely identify a test suite.
- Stage a test suite and its dependencies such as test frameworks.
- Provide the test subject to the test suite.
- Invoke a test suite in a consistent way.
- Gather test results and test artifacts from the invoked test suite.
The test suite is responsible to:
- Declare its dependencies such as a test framework via the standard interface.
- Execute the test framework as necessary.
- Provision (usually locally) any containers or virtual machines necessary for testing the test subject.
- Provide test results and test subjects back according to the standard
The format of the textual logs and test artifacts that come out of a test suite is not prescribed by this document. Nor is it envisioned to be standardized across all possible test suites.
- The test suite and test framework SHOULD NOT leak its implementation details into the testing system, other than via the standard interface.
- The test suite and test framework SHOULD NOT rely on behavior of the testing system other than the standard interface.
- The standard interface MUST enable a dist-git packager to run a test suite locally.
- Test suites or test frameworks MAY call out to the network for certain tasks.
- It MUST be possible to stage an upstream test suite using the standard interface.
- Both in-situ tests, and more rigorous outside-in tests MUST be possible with the standard interface.
- For in-situ tests the test suite is in the same file system tree and process space as the test subject.
- For outside-in tests the test suite is outside of the file system tree and process space of the test subject.
- The test suite and test framework SHOULD be able to provision containers and virtual machines necessary for its testing without requesting them from the testing system.
- The standard interface SHOULD describe how to uniquely identify a test suite,
Benefit to Fedora
Developers benefit by having a consistent target for how to describe tests, while also being able to execute them locally while debugging issues or iterating on tests.
By staging and invoking tests consistently in Fedora we create an eco-system for the tests that allows varied test frameworks as well as CI system infrastructure to interoperate. The integration tests outlast the implementation details of either the frameworks they're written in or the CI systems running them.
This standard interface describes how to discover, stage and invoke tests. It is important to cleanly separate implementation details of the testing system from the test suite and its framework. It is also important to allow Fedora packagers to locally and manually invoke a test suite.
Tests files will be added into the
tests/ folder of a dist-git repository branch. The structure of the files and folders is left to the liberty of the packagers but there are one or more playbooks in the
tests/ folder that can be invoked to run the test suites.
- The testing system SHOULD stage the tests on target (eg: Fedora) operating system appropriate for the branch name of the dist-git repository containing the tests.
- The testing system SHOULD stage a clean a system for each set of tests it runs.
- The testing system MUST stage the following packages:
ansible python2-dnf libselinux-python standard-test-roles
- The testing system MUST clone the dist-git repository for the test, and checks out the appropriate branch.
- The contents of
/etc/yum.repos.don the staged system SHOULD be replaced with repository information that reflects the known good Fedora packages corresponding to the branch of the dist-git repository.
- The testing system MAY use multiple repositories, including updates or updates-testing to ensure this.
The testing system MUST run the playbook
tests/tests.yml in the dist-git repo. The testing system should look for the presence of a file or directory
tests/inventory and take it into consideration below.
The test subjects are passed to the playbook and inventory as operating system environment and ansible environment. Often only one test subject is passed in. However multiple subjects may be concatenated together in a shell escaped string. The playbook and inventory script split the string. The extensions as follows are used to determine the type of subject:
|*.rpm||Absolute path to an RPM file|
|*.repo|| Absolute repo filenames appropriate for |
|*.qcow2||Absolute path to one virtual machine disk image bootable with cloud-init|
|*.oci||Absolute path of one OCI container image filesystem bundle|
|docker:*||Fully qualified path to a docker image in a registry|
To invoke the playbook, the testing system:
- MUST execute the playbook with the following operating system environment variables:
TEST_SUBJECTS: The test subjects string as described above
TEST_ARTIFACTS: The full path of an empty folder for test artifacts
- MUST execute the playbook with the following variables.
subjects: The test subjects string as described above
artifacts: The full path of an empty folder for test artifacts
- MUST execute Ansible with inventory set to the full path of the file or directory
tests/inventoryif it exists.
- If the
tests/inventoryfile doesn't exist, then the following inventory SHOULD be used as a default:
- If the
- MUST execute the playbook as root.
- MUST examine the exit code of the playbook. A zero exit code is successful test result, non-zero is failure.
- MUST treat the file
artifactsfolder as the main readable output of the test.
- SHOULD place the textual stdout/stderr of the
ansible-playbookcommand in the
ansible.logfile in the
- SHOULD treat the contents of the
artifactsfolder as the test artifacts.
The playbook and its test suite or test framework:
- SHOULD drop privileges appropriately if the test suite should be run as non-root.
- MUST install any requirements of its test suite or test framework and MUST fail if this is not possible.
- MUST provision the test subject listed in the
subjectsvariable appropriately for its playbook name (described above) and MUST fail if this is not possible.
- MUST place the main readable output of the test suite into a
test.logfile in the
artifactsvariable folder. This MUST happen even if some of the test suites fail.
- SHOULD place additional test artifacts in the folder defined in the
If an inventory file or script exists, it:
- MUST describe where to invoke the playbook and how to connect to that target.
- SHOULD launch or install any supported
$TEST_SUBJECTSso that the playbook can be invoked against them.\
- SHOULD put relevant logs in the
Test discovery is done via dist-git. Both packages and modules may have tests in this format.
Since the tests are added in a sub-folder of the dist-git repo, there are no changes required to the Fedora infrastructure and will have no impact on the packagers' workflow and tooling.
Only the testing system will need to be taught to install the requirements and run the playbooks.
A standard way to package, store and run tests benefits Fedora stability, and makes Fedora better for users.
- This structure makes it easy to run locally thus potentially reproducing an error triggered on the test system.
- Ansible is being more and more popular, thus making it easier for people to contribute new tests
- Used by a lot of sys-admin, ansible could help sys-admin to bring test-cases to the packagers and developers about situation where something failed for them.
There are no real upgrade or compatibility impact. The tests will be branched per release as spec files are branched dist-git is now.
Proposals and Evaluation
During the selection process for a standard test invocation and and layout format for Fedora, several proposals were examined.