From Fedora Project Wiki
(Add trackers)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->


It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build with incorrect version metadata.
It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build as RPM with incorrect version metadata.
They generate a wrong provide in format `python3dist(...) = 0` and `python3.Xdist(...) = 0`.
They generate a wrong provide in format `python3dist(...) = 0` and `python3.Xdist(...) = 0`.
While version 0 (or equal versions like 0.0 or 0.0.0) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error.  
While version `0` (or equal versions like `0.0` or `0.0.0`) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error.  
We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides.
We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides.


Line 24: Line 24:


== Current status ==
== Current status ==
[[Category:ChangePageIncomplete]]
[[Category:ChangeAcceptedF38]]
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->
Line 42: Line 42:
ON_QA -> change is fully code complete
ON_QA -> change is fully code complete
-->
-->
* FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
* [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JMOBH5CIF4XNXSD2LEEF45OW2HYNUZMW/ devel thread]
* Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
* FESCo issue: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2903 #2903]
* Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
* Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150046 #2150046]
* Release notes tracker: [https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issue/929 #929]


== Detailed Description ==
== Detailed Description ==
Line 54: Line 55:
* `python3.Xdist(distname) = 0`
* `python3.Xdist(distname) = 0`


Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...)
Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...).
It does not affect any other provides.
It does not affect any other provides.
More about the provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides
More about these provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides


''The provides are automatically generated from upstream metadata and sometimes such information s missing due to packaging error. Setuptools generates sometimes 0 which is bad, we agreed and proposed we will not accept the state
The provides generated during the RPM build come from the upstream Python package metadata.  
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow creating package with version `0.0.0` when the version used by a project is not known. This was [https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2329 discussed upstream] with conclusion that it's an intended behavior.


Setuptools sets this to 0.0.0
In other cases, for example when building package from a particular git commit, the incorrect provide can be generated due to a packaging error.
https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2329
We've never encountered a situation when packaging the version `0` was the package maintainers intention.
packaging from git
After a discussion on python-devel mailing list we agreed we'd like to prevent such situations from happening in Fedora.
no example when someone wanted to package 0.0.0
''


An example of the incorrect provides
An example of the incorrect provides:


  $ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm                                           
  $ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm                                           
Line 76: Line 76:
  '''python3dist(ssh-python) = 0'''
  '''python3dist(ssh-python) = 0'''


Why is it bad?
If any package requires `python3-ssh-python > 0.9` (correctly assuming there's `0.10.0` in Fedora's repositories), the automatic dependency generators will not discover the example package, making the other package non-installable.
In January 2022 the [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=python3dist0 umbrella Bugzilla ticket] was created for Python packages providing version `0`. In all cases the automatic provide wasn't intended.
Affected packages (as of Nov 11 2022):
b43-tools
dionaea
marisa
python-podman-api
rpkg
spectrographic
python-ssh-python
python-streamlink


In January 2022 the [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=python3dist0 umbrella Bugzilla ticket] was created for Python packages providing this incorrect provide:
On Nov 10 2022 there are 22 linked Bugzilla tickets, 13 of which are not closed.
''New check: 9 packages, in all cases this is wrong''
The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem.
The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem.


We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py]).
We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py]).
The generator will error and fail the build if `python3dist(...) = 0` was to be generated.
The generator will error and fail the build if `python3dist(...) = 0` was to be generated.
''Based on discussion on Fedora-devel there will be no way to opt out from this. Packagers who want to... encouraged to ask upstream to package at least 0.0.1''
 
Based on the discussion on fedora-devel mailing list, there will be a mechanism to opt out from this change.
A macro with a provisional name (TBD) `%__python_dist_allow_version_zero` will be created. If defined in the specfile, it will change the invocation of the Python RPM generators not to fail if a package providing version `0` was created. It will behave the same way as an already existing macro [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_python_no_extras_requires %_python_no_extras_requires] does.
 


== Feedback ==
== Feedback ==
Line 90: Line 106:


The idea was posted on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/ python-devel mailing list] and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.
The idea was posted on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/ python-devel mailing list] and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.
After the Change was announced on fedora-devel, it was requested to provide a mechanism to opt out from the Change.
It was pointed out that we shouldn't dictate the upstream's decisions, especially that [https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/ PEP 440] doesn't forbid using the version `0.0.0`. OTOH [https://semver.org/ semver specification] recommends starting at `0.1.0`.
The Change was updated to provide such mechanism, see Detailed Description.


== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Line 127: Line 148:
== Scope ==
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
* Proposal owners:
# implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators (pythondistdeps.py)
# implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators ([https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py])
# ...
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->


* Other developers: <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Other developers: <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
** fix the packaging error to generate correct metadata and successful build
** Fix the packaging error to generate correct metadata and successful build. There's no common way to deal with such packages. In most of the cases the issue originates from packaging errors that need to be fixed. Contact the change owners if you need help with the necessary changes to your package.
 
TBD how
''there's no common way to deal with such packages, it's one-by-one issue that originates mostly from packaging errors, ask the change owners if need a way forward''
 
<!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->


Line 143: Line 159:
The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication -->
The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication -->


* Policies and guidelines: ''https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_source_files_from_pypi - this is said here and that's enough even when we change the python RPM generators behavior'' <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Policies and guidelines: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_source_files_from_pypi Python Packaging Guidelines] cover the topic of creating the version string. This will be valid even when we change the Python RPM generators behavior <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
<!-- Do the packaging guidelines or other documents need to be updated for this feature?  If so, does it need to happen before or after the implementation is done?  If a FPC ticket exists, add a link here. Please submit a pull request with the proposed changes before submitting your Change proposal. -->
<!-- Do the packaging guidelines or other documents need to be updated for this feature?  If so, does it need to happen before or after the implementation is done?  If a FPC ticket exists, add a link here. Please submit a pull request with the proposed changes before submitting your Change proposal. -->


Line 157: Line 173:
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
None.
None.


== How To Test ==
== How To Test ==
Line 175: Line 190:


<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
TBD
* Prepare a Python package, set the version to `0`
''take package that provides 0 or prepare a package that has a version 0, build RPM, fail, profit''
or
* Use one of the known packages that provide version `0`.
* Try to build an RPM package in a regular way (eg. mockbuild)
* The build should fail.


== User Experience ==
== User Experience ==

Latest revision as of 18:06, 1 December 2022


Prevent from building RPM packages providing python3dist(...) = 0

Summary

It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build as RPM with incorrect version metadata. They generate a wrong provide in format python3dist(...) = 0 and python3.Xdist(...) = 0. While version 0 (or equal versions like 0.0 or 0.0.0) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error. We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides.

Owner

Current status

Detailed Description

This change is about automatic RPM provides in the following form:

  • python3dist(distname) = 0
  • python3.Xdist(distname) = 0

Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...). It does not affect any other provides. More about these provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides

The provides generated during the RPM build come from the upstream Python package metadata. Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow creating package with version 0.0.0 when the version used by a project is not known. This was discussed upstream with conclusion that it's an intended behavior.

In other cases, for example when building package from a particular git commit, the incorrect provide can be generated due to a packaging error. We've never encountered a situation when packaging the version 0 was the package maintainers intention. After a discussion on python-devel mailing list we agreed we'd like to prevent such situations from happening in Fedora.

An example of the incorrect provides:

$ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm                                           
python-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3-ssh-python(x86-64) = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3.11-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3.11dist(ssh-python) = 0
python3dist(ssh-python) = 0

Why is it bad?

If any package requires python3-ssh-python > 0.9 (correctly assuming there's 0.10.0 in Fedora's repositories), the automatic dependency generators will not discover the example package, making the other package non-installable.

In January 2022 the umbrella Bugzilla ticket was created for Python packages providing version 0. In all cases the automatic provide wasn't intended.

Affected packages (as of Nov 11 2022):

b43-tools
dionaea
marisa
python-podman-api
rpkg
spectrographic
python-ssh-python
python-streamlink

The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem.

We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely pythondistdeps.py). The generator will error and fail the build if python3dist(...) = 0 was to be generated.

Based on the discussion on fedora-devel mailing list, there will be a mechanism to opt out from this change. A macro with a provisional name (TBD) %__python_dist_allow_version_zero will be created. If defined in the specfile, it will change the invocation of the Python RPM generators not to fail if a package providing version 0 was created. It will behave the same way as an already existing macro %_python_no_extras_requires does.


Feedback

The idea was posted on python-devel mailing list and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.

After the Change was announced on fedora-devel, it was requested to provide a mechanism to opt out from the Change. It was pointed out that we shouldn't dictate the upstream's decisions, especially that PEP 440 doesn't forbid using the version 0.0.0. OTOH semver specification recommends starting at 0.1.0. The Change was updated to provide such mechanism, see Detailed Description.


Benefit to Fedora

The correct metadata is essential for the whole package ecosystem. More deterministic behavior of the generators will bring those benefits:

  • The packages will stop lying about the version they provide.
  • The requirements generators (eg. %pyproject_buildrequires) will correctly evaluate the Build- and Runtime Requirements based on the correct Provides.
  • The package maintainers who BuildRequire %{py3dist pkgname} >= 0.2 in their specfiles will always require the correctly evaluated version.

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
  1. implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators (pythondistdeps.py)
  • Other developers:
    • Fix the packaging error to generate correct metadata and successful build. There's no common way to deal with such packages. In most of the cases the issue originates from packaging errors that need to be fixed. Contact the change owners if you need help with the necessary changes to your package.
  • Release engineering: not needed for this Change
  • Policies and guidelines: Python Packaging Guidelines cover the topic of creating the version string. This will be valid even when we change the Python RPM generators behavior
  • Trademark approval: not needed for this Change
  • Alignment with Objectives: No

Upgrade/compatibility impact

None.

How To Test

  • Prepare a Python package, set the version to 0

or

  • Use one of the known packages that provide version 0.
  • Try to build an RPM package in a regular way (eg. mockbuild)
  • The build should fail.

User Experience

The actual users should notice no difference.

Dependencies

None

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: Revert
  • Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
  • Blocks release? No

Documentation

This page is the documentation of this change.

Release Notes