From Fedora Project Wiki
Line 79: Line 79:
<!-- Summarize the feedback from the community and address why you chose not to accept proposed alternatives. This section is optional for all change proposals but is strongly suggested. Incorporating feedback here as it is raised gives FESCo a clearer view of your proposal and leaves a good record for the future. If you get no feedback, that is useful to note in this section as well. For innovative or possibly controversial ideas, consider collecting feedback before you file the change proposal. -->
<!-- Summarize the feedback from the community and address why you chose not to accept proposed alternatives. This section is optional for all change proposals but is strongly suggested. Incorporating feedback here as it is raised gives FESCo a clearer view of your proposal and leaves a good record for the future. If you get no feedback, that is useful to note in this section as well. For innovative or possibly controversial ideas, consider collecting feedback before you file the change proposal. -->


The idea was posted on python-devel mailing list and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed:
The idea was posted on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/ python-devel mailing list] and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/


== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==

Revision as of 13:20, 11 November 2022


Prevent from building packages providing python3dist(...) = 0

Summary

It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build with false version metadata. They generate a wrong provide in format python3dist(...) = 0. While version 0 (or equal versions like 0.0 or 0.0.0) is probably technically valid, in most cases they indicates a packaging error. We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly erroring (and failing the build) when such provides was generated.

Owner

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora Linux 38
  • Last updated: 2022-11-11
  • FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

This change is about automatic RPM provides in the following form:

  • python3dist(distname) = 0
  • python3.Xdist(distname) = 0

Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...) It does not affect any other provides. More about the provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides

An example of the incorrect provides

$ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm                                           
python-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3-ssh-python(x86-64) = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3.11-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38
python3.11dist(ssh-python) = 0
python3dist(ssh-python) = 0


In January 2022 the umbrella Bugzilla ticket was created for Python packages providing this incorrect provide: On Nov 10 2022 there are 22 linked Bugzilla tickets, 13 of which are not closed. The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem.

We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely pythondistdeps.py). The generator will error and fail the build if python3dist(...) = 0 was to be generated.

Feedback

The idea was posted on python-devel mailing list and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.

Benefit to Fedora

The correct metadata is essential for the whole package ecosystem. More deterministic behavior of the generators will bring those benefits: The packages will stop lying about the version they provide. The requirements generators (eg. %pyproject_buildrequires) will correctly evaluate the Build- and Runtime Requirements based on the correct Provides. The package maintainers who BuildRequire %{py3dist pkgname} in their specfiles will always require the correctly evaluated version.

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
  1. implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators (pythondistdeps.py)
  2. ...
  • Other developers:
    • fix the packaging error to prevent from generating such metadata

TBD how

  • Release engineering: not needed for this Change
  • Policies and guidelines: not needed for this Change
  • Trademark approval: not needed for this Change
  • Alignment with Objectives: No

Upgrade/compatibility impact

None.


How To Test

TBD

User Experience

The actual users should notice no difference.

Dependencies

TBD

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: TBD
  • Contingency deadline: TBD
  • Blocks release? No


Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes