- 1 Remove support for SELinux runtime disable
Remove support for SELinux runtime disable
Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can be hardened via read-only-after-initialization protections.
Migrate users to using selinux=0 if they want to disable SELinux.
- Targeted release: Fedora 34
- Last updated: 2020-08-27
- FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
Support for SELinux runtime disable via /etc/selinux/config was originally developed to make it easier for Linux distributions to support architectures where adding parameters to the kernel command line was difficult. Unfortunately, supporting runtime disable meant we had to make some security trade-offs when it comes to the kernel LSM hooks.
Marking the kernel LSM hooks as read only provides some very nice security benefits, but it does mean that we can no longer disable SELinux at runtime. Toggling between enforcing and permissive mode while booted will remain unaffected and it will still be possible to disable SELinux by adding selinux=0 to the kernel command line via the boot loader (GRUB).
System with SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config will come up with selinuxfs unmounted, userspace will detect SELinux as disabled. Internally SELinux will be enabled but not initialized so that there will be no SELinux checks applied.
NOTE: Runtime disable is considered deprecated by upstream, and using it will become increasingly painful (e.g. sleeping/blocking) through future kernel releases until eventually it is removed completely. Current kernel reports the following message during runtime disable: SELinux: Runtime disable is deprecated, use selinux=0 on the kernel cmdline
Benefit to Fedora
Marking the LSM hooks as read-only provides extra security hardening against certain attacks, e.g. in case an attacker gains ability to write to random kernel memory locations, with support for disable SELinux runtime (CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y) they have a bigger chance to turn off (parts of) SELinux permission checking.
- Proposal owners:
- Make sure kernel is built without CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE
- Make sure relevant documentation is updated in a way that selinux=0 on kernel command line is preferred way to disable SELinux
- Make sure the installer uses kernel command line instead of /etc/selinux/config to disable SELinux
- Optional: selinux Ansible module should warn that SELinux needs to be disabled using selinux=0
- Optional: linux-system-roles.selinux should disable SELinux using selinux=0
- Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Release engineering: #Releng issue number (a check of an impact with Release Engineering is needed)
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
Users should not be directly affected by this change.
How To Test
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Install kernel built without CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE, e.g. from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/omos/drop-selinux-disable/
- Confirm that is disabled when selinux=0 is used on kernel command line
- Confirm that userspace consider SELinux disabled when SELINUX=disabled is used in /etc/selinux/config
- Confirm that userspace consider SELinux disabled when there's no /etc/selinux/config
- Confirm that system works as expected in all previous cases
There's no visible change for users with SELinux enabled.
Users with SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config and without selinux=0 on kernel command line might notice that
ps Z command uses kernel domain for processes, while with selinux=0
ps Z prints '-'.
These users will also be able to load SELinux policy after boot.
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Contingency mechanism: Revert the kernel build option change and build kernel with CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y
- Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
- Blocks release? No