From Fedora Project Wiki
(Change Ready for Wrangler)
(Change announced on 2013-07-17)
Line 20: Line 20:
<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name.  This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace -->
<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name.  This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace -->


= Removed deprecated calls of using ntpdate in favor of ntpd <!-- The name of your change proposal --> =
= Remove deprecated calls of using ntpdate in favor of ntpd <!-- The name of your change proposal --> =


== Summary ==
== Summary ==
Line 68: Line 68:
== Scope ==
== Scope ==
<!-- What work do the developers have to accomplish to complete the change in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do the developers have to accomplish to complete the change in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
Need to re-engineer the startup task for ntpdate ( /etc/init.d/ntpdate, NOT /usr/sbin/ntpdate ); or figure out if this is something that is more easily created via a cron job. Format /etc/sysconfig/ntpdate to accept additional options, as discussed above.
* Proposal owners: Need to re-engineer the startup task for ntpdate ( /etc/init.d/ntpdate, NOT /usr/sbin/ntpdate ); or figure out if this is something that is more easily created via a cron job. Format /etc/sysconfig/ntpdate to accept additional options, as discussed above.


* Proposal owners: Mike Harris
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->


Line 138: Line 137:
-->
-->


[[Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler]]
[[Category:ChangeAnnounced]]
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler -->

Revision as of 10:44, 17 July 2013


Remove deprecated calls of using ntpdate in favor of ntpd

Summary

ntpdate is slowly being depricated. STIG enhancements for RHEL 6 penalize systems that make use of ntpdate. Also documentation from the NSA Hardening Guidelines as well as CIS Hardening documentation recommends disabling the use of ntpd as a full-time daemon.

Owner

  • Name: Michael Harris
  • Email: MikeDawg (at) gmail (dot) com
  • Release notes owner:

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 20
  • Last updated: 2013-7-8
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

ntpdate is slowly being depricated in favor of ntpd. DoD STIGs now penalize for the use of ntpdate on Red Hat Enterprise systems. I would like to "modernize" the ntpdate utility to do two things.

First, I would like to get rid of the dependency of ntpdate, in favor of ntpd.

Second, I would like to add a set time and/or randomized time for ntpd to check for time updates (as configured by the user in /etc/sysconfig/ntpdate).

I'm thinking of using ntpd with the -q option to immediately exit the daemon after it runs.

Benefit to Fedora

First and foremost, it is backing away from a dependency that is set to deprecate at some point in the future. ntpd now handles many/most of the tasks that ntpdate was once used for. I'm also adding the feature of either random time checks based on a user interval, or just checks at an interval.

Scope

  • Proposal owners: Need to re-engineer the startup task for ntpdate ( /etc/init.d/ntpdate, NOT /usr/sbin/ntpdate ); or figure out if this is something that is more easily created via a cron job. Format /etc/sysconfig/ntpdate to accept additional options, as discussed above.


  • Other developers: None
  • Release engineering: None
  • Policies and guidelines: None

Upgrade/compatibility impact

No changes will be needed for the system to function as-is. In order to incorporate a (random or not) check of time will require modification of the /etc/sysconfig/ntpdate configuration file.

How To Test

Will need to verify that ntpd correctly launches, and is able to set the time/date. Will also need to verify the random/interval check is running. This can be easily done by parsing the info out the log files.

User Experience

Will not be noticeable to the average audience. The change will impact those that are doing various levels of security checks/tests against their systems, and more specifically, those that are using guidelines from the DoD STIGs, NSA Hardening Guidelines (currently only up to RHEL 5, however, many of the configurations still apply), and the CIS Hardening Documents.

Dependencies

Will have the continued dependency on ntpd.

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Revert to the previous configuration of continuing use of ntpdate.
  • Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze
  • Blocks release? No

Documentation

Nothing yet, however, will update documentation for the previously used ntpdate package.

Release Notes