From Fedora Project Wiki

No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
* [http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/06/catastrafont.html catastrafont], 2008-06-16
* [http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/06/catastrafont.html catastrafont], 2008-06-16
* [http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2008/03/20/T13_47_17/ state of fonts review], 2008-03-20<ref>weak points: subjective preferences, technical assessments; strong point: state of our font preferences tools.</ref>
* [http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2008/03/20/T13_47_17/ state of fonts review], 2008-03-20<ref>weak points: subjective preferences, technical assessments; strong point: state of our font preferences tools.</ref>
* [http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/17/linux-achilles-heel-fonts/, Linux Achilles' heel: fonts] 2006-08-17
* [http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/17/linux-achilles-heel-fonts/ Linux Achilles' heel: fonts] 2006-08-17


{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}} [[Category:Fonts SIG]]
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}} [[Category:Fonts SIG]]

Revision as of 15:46, 23 July 2008

A page of the Fonts Special Interest Group

Every once in a while someone posts an (often entertainning) diatribe on the state of Linux fonts and text layouting. A complex mix of exaggerations, long-past facts, subjective preferences, references to other distributions, and plain mistakes, they nevertheless contain little nuggets of truth pointing to actual problems.

Because the Fonts SIG is all about fixing those problems, we encourage people to list those articles there:


Idea.png
Fonts in Fedora
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.
  1. ↑ weak points: subjective preferences, technical assessments; strong point: state of our font preferences tools.
Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Diatribes_on_Linux_fonts&oldid=41137"