Elections/Questionnaire: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:14, 26 January 2015

The question collection period is closed
The collection period ended.

The following elections will take place in January 2015:

FESCo (Engineering) (five seats)
Env and Stacks (four seats)

All dates and times noted are UTC time.

Please add questions you'd like to see asked to this page.

Candidates, don't post your answers here
Once the questionnaire period is over, the Elections Wrangler will collect the answers and with help from Marketing team, interview for Fedora Magazine will be prepared. Questions will be sent to you in advance and interviews with all candidates will be published the same date (to be fair to all).

CLOSED The questionnaire is closed. No further questions will now be added. Please do not modify this page!

FESCo (Engineering)

Questions

What is your background in Fedora? What have you worked on and what are you doing now?

Do you think Fedora should be time based or more feature driven distribution? Or compromise?

What are the most pressing issues facing Fedora today (from engineering POV)? What should we do about them?

Care to share a screenshot of your Fedora desktop?

What are your interests and experience outside of Fedora? What of those things will help you in this role?

Anything else voters should know?

How can FESCo do a better job communicating with the rest of the Fedora community, or do you feel that FESCo is already doing well here?

What can you accomplish as part of FESCo that you couldn't accomplish as a contributor to Fedora without sitting on FESCo?

What degree of leeway do you feel that the Working Groups should have to diverge from one another in establishing their own identity?

How would you define the set of criteria for promoting a spin to a product? What about the reverse?

With the advent of Fedora Council now, what do you see as the significance of FESCO in Fedora project?

How "closely" do you, as a member of FESCO, follow the devel mailing list before voting on FESCO meetings? In other words, apart from your own technical qualifications, what is your typical process in arriving at decisions?

Next question here

History

Questions from previous elections can be found here:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{admon/important|The question collection period has begun|Please post your questions below. The wrangler will collate them and pass them on to the nominees at the end of the collection period.}}
+<!--{{admon/important|The question collection period has begun|Please post your questions below. The wrangler will collate them and pass them on to the nominees at the end of the collection period. Nominees will answer these questions as part of Fedora Magazine interview. Questions could be moderated to fit Fedora Magazine format. The collection period will close on January 22, 19:00 UTC.}}-->
-<!--{{admon/important|The question collection period is closed|The collection period ended at 23:59:59 UTC on May 25, 2013.}}-->
-The following elections will take place in January 2014:
+{{admon/important|The question collection period is closed|The collection period ended.}}
-* [[Board/Elections/Nominations|Fedora Project Board]] (two seats: E1 and E2)
+The following elections will take place in January 2015:
-* [[Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations|FESCo (Engineering)]] (four seats)
-* [[FAmSCo_nominations|FAmSCo (Ambassadors)]] (three seats)
+* [[Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations|FESCo (Engineering)]] (five seats)
+* [[Env_and_Stacks/Nominations|Env and Stacks]] (four seats)
+<!--* [[FAmSCo_nominations|FAmSCo (Ambassadors)]] (three seats)-->
 All dates and times noted are UTC time.
@@ Line 12: / Line 13: @@
 Please add questions you'd like to see asked to this page.
-{{admon/warning|Candiates, don't post your answers yet|Once the questionnaire period is over, the Elections Wrangler will collect the answers and post them at the same time. This attempts to make things more even and fair for candidates to be open with their answers and not copy from earlier responses.}}
+{{admon/warning|Candidates, don't post your answers here|Once the questionnaire period is over, the Elections Wrangler will collect the answers and with help from Marketing team, interview for Fedora Magazine will be prepared. Questions will be sent to you in advance and interviews with all candidates will be published the same date (to be fair to all).}}
-<!--{{admon/note|CLOSED The questionnaire is closed. No further questions will now be added. Please do not modify this page!}}-->
+{{admon/note|CLOSED The questionnaire is closed. No further questions will now be added. Please do not modify this page!}}
 <!--{{admon/warning|CLOSED The questionnaire is not yet open. Please wait for the announcement!}}-->
-== [[Board_nominations|Fedora Project Board]] ==
+== [[Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations|FESCo (Engineering)]] ==
 === Questions ===
-* Do you agree with, and are you committed to, the Fedora [[Foundations]]? If no, what do you believe should be changed?
+==== What is your background in Fedora? What have you worked on and what are you doing now? ====
-* Do you believe that it is incompatible with the Freedom foundation to allow ''in any way'' the installation of non-free software from Fedora products without an explicit and informed action on the part of the user/system administrator to allow the installation of such software?
+==== Do you think Fedora should be time based or more feature driven distribution? Or compromise? ====
-* With all the changes happening (or proposed) within Fedora, how important do you think it is to attract new contributors (actually, even otherwise - without the changes)? What would be your plan for the same?
+==== What are the most pressing issues facing Fedora today (from engineering POV)? What should we do about them? ====
-* Add your question here
+==== Care to share a screenshot of your Fedora desktop? ====
+==== What are your interests and experience outside of Fedora? What of those things will help you in this role? ====
+==== Anything else voters should know? ====
+==== How can FESCo do a better job communicating with the rest of the Fedora community, or do you feel that FESCo is already doing well here? ====
+==== What can you accomplish as part of FESCo that you couldn't accomplish as a contributor to Fedora without sitting on FESCo? ====
+==== What degree of leeway do you feel that the Working Groups should have to diverge from one another in establishing their own identity? ====
+==== How would you define the set of criteria for promoting a spin to a product? What about the reverse? ====
+==== With the advent of Fedora Council now, what do you see as the significance of FESCO in Fedora project? ====
+==== How "closely" do you, as a member of FESCO, follow the devel mailing list before voting on FESCO meetings? In other words, apart from your own technical qualifications, what is your typical process in arriving at decisions? ====
-== [[Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations|Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo)]] ==
+==== Next question here ====
-=== Questions ===
-* To achieve competitive advantage, have defined a strategy? Differentiation? Focus? Both?
-* Do you agree with, and are you committed to, the Fedora [[Foundations]]? If no, what do you believe should be changed?
-* Do you believe that it is incompatible with the Freedom foundation to allow ''in any way'' the installation of non-free software from Fedora products without an explicit and informed action on the part of the user/system administrator to allow the installation of such software?
-== [[FAmSCo_nominations|Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee (FAmSCo)]] ==
-=== Questions ===
-* Add your question here
-* How can we improve the management of budgets in all regions?
-* How can we encourage ambassadors from all regions and maintain that strong bond with the community?
-* Could you give us your ideas you have to improve the community?
 == History ==

Search