From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
=== | === Linux kernel to fully support Xen: Too little too late? (Techtarget.com) === | ||
[[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] forwarded<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011- | [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] forwarded<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-June/013950.html</ref> an article on upcoming Xen integration with the Linux kernel: | ||
" | "Core to KVM’s rapid success is the fact that it’s included in the | ||
kernel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but | |||
since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do | |||
some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make | |||
it work. That’s a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT | |||
staff. By contrast, since KVM’s inclusion in the kernel and declared | |||
support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting | |||
a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors." | |||
The | "The Xen community has been trying to get Xen introduced into the Linux | ||
kernel for years, but the need for multiple kernel binaries was always a | |||
sticking point with Linux kernel maintainers. In 2009, Linux creator | |||
Linus Torvalds wrote that "Xen really is horribly badly separated out. | |||
It gets way more incestuous with other systems than it should. It's | |||
entirely possible that this is very fundamental to both | |||
paravirtualization and to hypervisor behavior, but it doesn't matter -- | |||
it just means that I can well see that Xen is a f---ing pain to merge." | |||
The full post is available<ref>http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/news/2240036580/Linux-kernel-to-fully-support-Xen-Too-little-too-late</ref>. | |||
The full | |||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
=== Fedora ( | === Fedora 16 with Btrfs as standard file system (The H Online) === | ||
[[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] forwarded<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011- | [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] forwarded<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-June/013949.html</ref> details on a recent FESCo affirmation for Fedora 16 to use Btrfs: | ||
" | "At its IRC meeting on Wednesday, the Fedora Engineering Steering | ||
Committee (FESCo) resolved to use Btrfs as the standard file system in | |||
Fedora 16 "Verne". Btrfs was called the "Next Generation File System for | |||
Linux" by numerous major kernel developers two years ago and is still | |||
labelled as experimental. For Fedora 16 there will be a "simple switch" | |||
from Ext4 to the new file system; therefore Fedora's installation | |||
program will not force Btrfs' RAID- and LVM-like capabilities onto users." | |||
The full posting is available<ref>http://www. | The full posting is available<ref>http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Fedora-16-with-Btrfs-as-standard-file-system-1257844.html</ref>. | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
=== | === Review: Red Hat Fedora 15 (Computing UK)=== | ||
Kara Schiltz forwarded<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-June/013948.html</ref> a review of Fedora 15 in UK's Computing: | |||
<http:// | |||
"Version 15 of Red Hat's<ref>http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/review/2075505/review-red-hat-fedora#</ref> | |||
and | community project Linux distribution Fedora showed great stability, and it was simple to add applications onto the platform. We had no problem with hardware drivers and the new GNOME 3 GUI was easy to use, even though initially we did seem to be blundering about. Fedora would suit corporate road warriors who would like a combined Fedora-Windows dual-boot system (in case of OS failure), or anybody interested enough to see how far Linux has advanced compared to Windows and Mac OS X operating systems." | ||
The full | The full article is available<ref>http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/review/2075505/review-red-hat-fedora</ref>. | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 13:14, 21 June 2011
Fedora In the News
In this section, we cover news from the trade press and elsewhere that is re-posted to the Fedora Marketing list[1].
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing
Contributing Writer: Pascal Calarco
Linux kernel to fully support Xen: Too little too late? (Techtarget.com)
Rahul Sundaram forwarded[1] an article on upcoming Xen integration with the Linux kernel:
"Core to KVM’s rapid success is the fact that it’s included in the kernel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it work. That’s a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staff. By contrast, since KVM’s inclusion in the kernel and declared support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
"The Xen community has been trying to get Xen introduced into the Linux kernel for years, but the need for multiple kernel binaries was always a sticking point with Linux kernel maintainers. In 2009, Linux creator Linus Torvalds wrote that "Xen really is horribly badly separated out. It gets way more incestuous with other systems than it should. It's entirely possible that this is very fundamental to both paravirtualization and to hypervisor behavior, but it doesn't matter -- it just means that I can well see that Xen is a f---ing pain to merge."
The full post is available[2].
Fedora 16 with Btrfs as standard file system (The H Online)
Rahul Sundaram forwarded[1] details on a recent FESCo affirmation for Fedora 16 to use Btrfs:
"At its IRC meeting on Wednesday, the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) resolved to use Btrfs as the standard file system in Fedora 16 "Verne". Btrfs was called the "Next Generation File System for Linux" by numerous major kernel developers two years ago and is still labelled as experimental. For Fedora 16 there will be a "simple switch" from Ext4 to the new file system; therefore Fedora's installation program will not force Btrfs' RAID- and LVM-like capabilities onto users."
The full posting is available[2].
Review: Red Hat Fedora 15 (Computing UK)
Kara Schiltz forwarded[1] a review of Fedora 15 in UK's Computing:
"Version 15 of Red Hat's[2] community project Linux distribution Fedora showed great stability, and it was simple to add applications onto the platform. We had no problem with hardware drivers and the new GNOME 3 GUI was easy to use, even though initially we did seem to be blundering about. Fedora would suit corporate road warriors who would like a combined Fedora-Windows dual-boot system (in case of OS failure), or anybody interested enough to see how far Linux has advanced compared to Windows and Mac OS X operating systems."
The full article is available[3].