From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(36 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure


Contributing Writer:  HuzaifaSidhpurwala
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== More puppet training! ===  
=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


Mike McGrath writes for fedora-infrastructure-list [1]
Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.


Mike proposed that he is going to hold a couple of trainings for Puppet on fedora-infrastructure. And asked if any one had questions etc to be included in the training.
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.


[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00001.html
<references/>
 
=== Removal of old projects from fedorahosted. ===
 
susmit shannigrahi writes for fedora-infrastructure-list [2]
 
Susmit reminded the list that, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted projects that are
not altered or updated for last six months. And provided a list of projects, which falls into this category and they will soon be removed.
 
 
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00050.html
 
 
=== Beta Freeze ===
 
Mike McGrath writes for fedora-infrastructure-list [3]
 
Mike reminded everyone that the beta freeze is going to live and it will end on
2008-09-24. This is the first pre-release freeze type the infrastructure team has had [4]
 
 
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00096.html
 
[4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/Release#Change_Freeze

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.