From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

(WikiNames, past tense. Capitalize titles. Nice readable work.)
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure


Contributing Writer:  HuzaifaSidhpurwala
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== More Puppet Training! ===  
=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


[[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [1] that he is going to hold a couple of trainings for Puppet on fedora-infrastructure. He asked if any one had questions etc to be included in the training.
Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.


[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00001.html
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


=== Removal of Old Projects from fedorahosted. ===
[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.


[[SusmitShannigrahi|Susmit Shannigrahi]] reminded[2] the list that, Fedora has a policy to remove _any_ hosted projects that are not altered or updated for last six months. Susmit provided a list of projects, which fell into this category and they will soon be removed.
<references/>
 
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00050.html
 
=== Beta Freeze ===
 
[[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] reminded[3] everyone that the beta freeze is going to live and it will end on
2008-09-24. This is the first pre-release freeze type the infrastructure team has had[4].
 
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00096.html
 
[4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/Release#Change_Freeze

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.