From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(317 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue -->
{{Anchor|Virtualization}}
{{Anchor|Virtualization}}


== Virtualization ==
== Virtualization ==
In this section, we cover discussion on the @et-mgmnt-tools-list, @fedora-xen-  list, @libvirt-list and @ovirt-devel-list of Fedora virtualization              technologies.
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the
@fedora-virt list.


Contributing Writer: [[DaleBewley | Dale Bewley]]
Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]]


=== Enterprise Management Tools List ===
=== Fedora Virtualization List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools et-mgmt-tools list]
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].
 
=== Fedora Xen List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen fedora-xen list].
 
=== Libvirt List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].
 
 
 
==== sVirt 0.20 Patch Request for Comments ====
[[JamesMorris|James Morris]] announced[1] "the release of v0.20 (FWN#149[2]) of sVirt, a project to add security labeling support to Linux-based virtualization. I'm hoping to be able to propose an initial version for upstream merge
within the next few minor releases, tasks for which are being scoped out
in the new TODO list[3]."
 
"If the current release passes review, the next major task will be to add
dynamic MCS labeling of domains and disk images for simple isolation."


[[DanielBerrange|Daniel P. Berrange]] said "this patch all looks pretty good to me from a the point of view of libvirt integration & XML config representation."
==== Virt Status Report ====
[[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]]
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report.
Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.


[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-December/msg00260.html
<references />


[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue149#sVirt_Initial_Prototype_Release
==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ====
Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4
compared to Fedora 12.


[3] http://selinuxproject.org/page/SVirt/TODO
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
 
explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref>
==== Latest libvirt on RHEL and CentOS 5.2 ====
"The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind
[[MarcoSinhoreli|Marco Sinhoreli]] needed[1] {{package|libvirt}} 0.5.x
Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was
for testing <code>oVirt</code> on RHEL 5.2. Marco wondered what was necessary to update from the 0.3.x version available for RHEL.
rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is
 
also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of
Soon after, [[DanielBerrange|Daniel P. Berrange]]  
kvm-83 and kvm-84."
"uploaded[2] a set of patches[3] which make <code>libvirt</code> 0.5.1 work with
RHEL-5's version of <code>Xen</code>. Basically we have to tweak a few version
assumptions to take account of fact that RHEL-5 <code>Xen</code> has a number of
feature backports like the new paravirt framebuffer and NUMA support."
 
"Of course running a newer libvirt on RHEL-5 is totally unsupported but
hopefully these will be usful to those who absolutely need this newer
<code>libvirt</code> and don't mind about lack of support."
 
[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-December/msg00218.html
 
[2] http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-December/msg00298.html
 
[3] http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/libvirt-rhel5-xen/
 
=== oVirt Devel List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel ovirt-devel list].


==== Building oVirt from Rawhide ====
<references />
[[Perry Myers|Perry Myers]] posted[1] instructions for building[2] and
installing[3] <code>oVirt</code> from rawhide.


[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/ovirt-devel/2008-December/msg00127.html


[2] http://ovirt.org/rawhide-build-instructions.html
====  ====
<references />


[3] http://ovirt.org/rawhide-install-instructions.html
====  ====
<references />

Latest revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2009



Virtualization

In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @fedora-virt list.

Contributing Writer: Dale Bewley

Fedora Virtualization List

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-virt list.

Virt Status Report

Justin Forbes posted[1] a Fedora virtualization status report. Justin pointed out F13 bugs[2] now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.

RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity

Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features[1] of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 compared to Fedora 12.

Daniel Berrange explained[2] "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind Fedora as you might think. The Package-x-generic-16.pnglibvirt mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was rebased to be near parity with Fedora 11, and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of kvm-83 and kvm-84."