(48 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue --> | [[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue --> | ||
+ | {{Anchor|Virtualization}} | ||
− | |||
== Virtualization == | == Virtualization == | ||
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the | In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the | ||
− | @fedora-virt | + | @fedora-virt list. |
− | |||
Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] | Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. | ||
− | ==== | + | ==== Virt Status Report ==== |
− | + | [[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]] | |
− | [[ | + | posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report. |
− | + | Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | ==== Fedora | + | ==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ==== |
− | + | Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 | |
− | + | compared to Fedora 12. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]] | |
− | + | explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref> | |
− | + | "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind | |
+ | Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was | ||
+ | rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is | ||
+ | also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of | ||
+ | kvm-83 and kvm-84." | ||
− | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==== ==== | ==== ==== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==== ==== | ==== ==== | ||
<references /> | <references /> |
Latest revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2009
Contents
Virtualization
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @fedora-virt list.
Contributing Writer: Dale Bewley
Fedora Virtualization List
This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-virt list.
Virt Status Report
Justin Forbes posted[1] a Fedora virtualization status report. Justin pointed out F13 bugs[2] now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.
RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity
Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features[1] of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 compared to Fedora 12.
Daniel Berrange
explained[2]
"The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind
Fedora as you might think. The
mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was
rebased to be near parity with Fedora 11, and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is
also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of
kvm-83 and kvm-84."
libvirt