(Imported from MoinMoin)
m (fixed category)
|(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)|
|Line 37:||Line 37:|
Latest revision as of 10:24, 14 April 2009
 Fedora Weekly News Issue 84: Errata
From time to time, we issue an Errata to correct Fedora Weekly News published in previous week. We apologize for any confusion it may cause. If you feel a news needs to be corrected, please submit an "Errata Request" to Fedora News Team .
 Developments: Errata
In this section, we cover Errata in Developments section in previous issue.
 Erratum #1
In FWN Issue #84, in the section entitled "Mass Package Rebuilds - Papering Over Cracks or Shaking the Tree?" we erroneously wrote:
"JohnPoelstra posted details of the Release Engineering Meeting . ThorstenLeemhuis was against one of the decisions made in the meeting: the rebuilding en masse of all packages at Test2 release time."
This should have read:
"JohnPoelstra posted details of the Release Engineering Meeting . These included a note that a mass rebuild of all packages around, but no later than test2 will be considered in the future. ThorstenLeemhuis mentioned in a reply that he was against rebuilding en masse all packages for each cycle."
 Erratum #2
In FWN #84, in the section entitled "Packaging Extensions for Mozilla Applications: Security Implications" we misattributed an opinion to VilleSkyttä:
"VilleSkyttä remembered  a conversation from the past that suggested there was some interest in packaging the extensions. He was specifically interested in making it easier to obtain a 64-bit version of enigmail."
This was in fact ThorstenLeemhuis, not VilleSkyttä.
This document is maintained by the Fedora News Team . Please feel free to contact us to give your feedback. If you'd like to contribute to a future issue of the Fedora Weekly News, please see the Join page to find out how to help.