From FedoraProject

< FWN | Issue84
Revision as of 16:38, 24 May 2008 by Admin (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search


Fedora Weekly News Issue 84: Errata

From time to time, we issue an Errata to correct Fedora Weekly News[1] published in previous week. We apologize for any confusion it may cause. If you feel a news needs to be corrected, please submit an "Errata Request" to Fedora News Team[2] .

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN

[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject

Developments: Errata

In this section, we cover Errata in Developments section in previous issue.

Erratum #1

In FWN Issue #84, in the section entitled "Mass Package Rebuilds - Papering Over Cracks or Shaking the Tree?" we erroneously wrote:

"JohnPoelstra posted details of the Release Engineering Meeting[1] . ThorstenLeemhuis was against one of the decisions made in the meeting: the rebuilding en masse of all packages at Test2 release time."

This should have read:

"JohnPoelstra posted details of the Release Engineering Meeting[1] . These included a note that a mass rebuild of all packages around, but no later than test2 will be considered in the future. ThorstenLeemhuis mentioned in a reply that he was against rebuilding en masse all packages for each cycle."

Erratum #2

In FWN #84, in the section entitled "Packaging Extensions for Mozilla Applications: Security Implications" we misattributed an opinion to VilleSkyttä:

"VilleSkyttä remembered [2] a conversation from the past that suggested there was some interest in packaging the extensions. He was specifically interested in making it easier to obtain a 64-bit version of enigmail."

This was in fact ThorstenLeemhuis, not VilleSkyttä.


This document is maintained by the Fedora News Team[1] . Please feel free to contact us to give your feedback. If you'd like to contribute to a future issue of the Fedora Weekly News, please see the Join[2] page to find out how to help.

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject

[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject/Join