From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with '{{admon/important | Comments and Explanations | The page source contains comments providing guidance to fill out each section. They are invisible when viewing this page. To rea...')
 
Line 11: Line 11:
<!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/YourFeatureName.  This keeps all features in the same namespace -->
<!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/YourFeatureName.  This keeps all features in the same namespace -->


= Feature Name <!-- The name of your feature --> =
= Remove SETUid <!-- The name of your feature --> =


== Summary ==
== Summary ==
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this feature is and what it will do.  This information is used for the overall feature summary page for each release. -->
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this feature is and what it will do.  This information is used for the overall feature summary page for each release. -->
 
File Capabilties have been present in the Operating System for a few releases now, it is time that we remove setuid applications and just assign the capapilities required by an application.  This should make the applications and the Operating System more secure.
== Owner ==
== Owner ==
<!--This should link to your home wiki page so we know who you are-->
<!--This should link to your home wiki page so we know who you are-->
* Name: [[User:FASAcountName| Your Name]]
* Name: [[User:dwalsh| Daniel Walsh]]


<!-- Include you email address that you can be reached should people want to contact you about helping with your feature, status is requested, or  technical issues need to be resolved-->
<!-- Include you email address that you can be reached should people want to contact you about helping with your feature, status is requested, or  technical issues need to be resolved-->
* Email: <your email address so we can contact you, invite you to meetings, etc.>
* Email: <dwalsh@redhat.com>


== Current status ==
== Current status ==
* Targeted release: [[Releases/<number> | Fedora <number> ]]  
* Targeted release: [[Releases/15 | Fedora <15> ]]  
* Last updated: (DATE)
* Last updated: (DATE) 2010-10-25
* Percentage of completion: XX%
* Percentage of completion: 10%


<!-- CHANGE THE "FedoraVersion" TEMPLATES ABOVE TO PLAIN NUMBERS WHEN YOU COMPLETE YOUR PAGE. -->
<!-- CHANGE THE "FedoraVersion" TEMPLATES ABOVE TO PLAIN NUMBERS WHEN YOU COMPLETE YOUR PAGE. -->
Line 32: Line 32:
== Detailed Description ==
== Detailed Description ==
<!-- Expand on the summary, if appropriate.  A couple sentences suffices to explain the goal, but the more details you can provide the better. -->
<!-- Expand on the summary, if appropriate.  A couple sentences suffices to explain the goal, but the more details you can provide the better. -->
 
We need to change the spec files of all applications that include a setuid application to remove the setuid flag and change to file capabilities.
== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
<!-- What is the benefit to the platform?  If this is a major capability update, what has changed?  If this is a new feature, what capabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this feature?-->
<!-- What is the benefit to the platform?  If this is a major capability update, what has changed?  If this is a new feature, what capabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this feature?-->
This will benefit Fedora by making it more secure.


== Scope ==
== Scope ==
<!-- What work do the developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do the developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
Open up a tracker bug, then open a bugzilla on every package that includes setuid applications.  We would like to have the Fedora packaging committee codify this in rules and perhaps rpmlint to have smarts about identifying setuid apps and recommending file capabilities.


== How To Test ==
== How To Test ==
Line 53: Line 55:
3. What are the expected results of those actions?
3. What are the expected results of those actions?
-->
-->
Do a complete install of all Fedora packages and then search for any applications that have the setuid flag.  If they do then the Feature is not complete.  For any application that was setuid and now uses file capabilities, we need to test that the applications still works as it used to.  Test rpmlint on an spec file containing a setuid app, and make sure it prints a proper warning.


== User Experience ==
== User Experience ==
<!-- If this feature is noticeable by its target audience, how will their experiences change as a result?  Describe what they will see or notice. -->
<!-- If this feature is noticeable by its target audience, how will their experiences change as a result?  Describe what they will see or notice. -->
No change in User Experience should be expected.


== Dependencies ==
== Dependencies ==
<!-- What other packages (RPMs) depend on this package?  Are there changes outside the developers' control on which completion of this feature depends?  In other words, completion of another feature owned by someone else and might cause you to not be able to finish on time or that you would need to coordinate?  Other upstream projects like the kernel (if this is not a kernel feature)? -->
<!-- What other packages (RPMs) depend on this package?  Are there changes outside the developers' control on which completion of this feature depends?  In other words, completion of another feature owned by someone else and might cause you to not be able to finish on time or that you would need to coordinate?  Other upstream projects like the kernel (if this is not a kernel feature)? -->
We have a dependency that every package that contains a setuid app, is changed by the package owner.  Although if we get some/most packages we feel that we have improved the security of the system.


== Contingency Plan ==
== Contingency Plan ==
<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan?  This might be as simple as "None necessary, revert to previous release behaviour."  Or it might not.  If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy.  -->
<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan?  This might be as simple as "None necessary, revert to previous release behaviour."  Or it might not.  If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy.  -->
None Necessary


== Documentation ==
== Documentation ==
<!-- Is there upstream documentation on this feature, or notes you have written yourself?  Link to that material here so other interested developers can get involved. -->
<!-- Is there upstream documentation on this feature, or notes you have written yourself?  Link to that material here so other interested developers can get involved. -->
*
*
We should change documentation on packaging guidelines to talk about using file capabilities.


== Release Notes ==
== Release Notes ==

Revision as of 12:40, 25 October 2010

Important.png
Comments and Explanations
The page source contains comments providing guidance to fill out each section. They are invisible when viewing this page. To read it, choose the "edit" link.
Copy the source to a new page before making changes! DO NOT EDIT THIS TEMPLATE FOR YOUR FEATURE.
Important.png
Set a Page Watch
Make sure you click watch on your new page so that you are notified of changes to it by others, including the Feature Wrangler
Note.png
All sections of this template are required for review by FESCo. If any sections are empty it will not be reviewed



Remove SETUid

Summary

File Capabilties have been present in the Operating System for a few releases now, it is time that we remove setuid applications and just assign the capapilities required by an application. This should make the applications and the Operating System more secure.

Owner

  • Email: <dwalsh@redhat.com>

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora <15>
  • Last updated: (DATE) 2010-10-25
  • Percentage of completion: 10%


Detailed Description

We need to change the spec files of all applications that include a setuid application to remove the setuid flag and change to file capabilities.

Benefit to Fedora

This will benefit Fedora by making it more secure.

Scope

Open up a tracker bug, then open a bugzilla on every package that includes setuid applications. We would like to have the Fedora packaging committee codify this in rules and perhaps rpmlint to have smarts about identifying setuid apps and recommending file capabilities.

How To Test

Do a complete install of all Fedora packages and then search for any applications that have the setuid flag. If they do then the Feature is not complete. For any application that was setuid and now uses file capabilities, we need to test that the applications still works as it used to. Test rpmlint on an spec file containing a setuid app, and make sure it prints a proper warning.

User Experience

No change in User Experience should be expected.

Dependencies

We have a dependency that every package that contains a setuid app, is changed by the package owner. Although if we get some/most packages we feel that we have improved the security of the system.

Contingency Plan

None Necessary

Documentation

We should change documentation on packaging guidelines to talk about using file capabilities.

Release Notes

Comments and Discussion