Latest revision as of 11:08, 15 August 2013

Features/WebserverDependency

Summary

Provide a way how to install and use web applications (for example phpMyAdmin or Mailman) with any web server in Fedora.

Owner

Name: Jan Kaluza

Email: jkaluza@redhat.com

Current status

Targeted release: [[Releases/<number> | Fedora <number> ]]
Last updated: (DATE)
Percentage of completion: 0%

Detailed Description

Currently, packages like phpMyAdmin or Mailman requires httpd installed. This is wrong, because they can work properly even with Lighttpd or nginx. Following list contains the reasons why the particular package needs httpd and how to fix it:

Package includes files owned by apache user/group

This is needed when files have to be readable by webserver and therefore they have to have proper owner or group. Each webserver in Fedora has its own user/group under which it's running. This should be changed and one group shared by all servers should be introduced.

Web application package maintainer then must use shared group instead of "apache" group.

Package includes httpd configuration files

To move web server related configuration into new subpackage, new packaging layout should be introduced (mailman is used as an example here):

mailman-core - Contains all mailman files except web server related configurations. This subpackage must not require any web server.
mailman-httpd (mailman-xxx) - Contains web server related configuration files and must require particular web server.
mailman - To keep the backward compatibility and upgrade from older versions, main package must require -core and -httpd subpackages.

Maintainer does not have to create config files (and subpackages) for all webservers, but it must be possible to install -core subpackage without any dependency on particular web server, so the administrator can choose and configure the web server himself.

Package requires web server specific modules

If the package requires web server specific modules like mod_wsgi or mod_php, then those dependencies must be moved into web server specific subpackage like described above.

Package "Requires: php"

"php" as dependency is not needed, because too ambiguous (in fact this package is mod_php for apache).

Instead, must requires the used SAPI (mod_php, php-fpm or php-cgi)

Benefit to Fedora

Ability to install various web applications without pulling httpd as a dependency if it's not needed.
Maintainers are able to add support for more web servers in their packages.
Unification of web application packaging.

Scope

Discuss this feature with web servers maintainers in Fedora and get consensus on shared group name, add this group to Fedora and use it in web servers.
Change configuration of lighttpd and nginx to be able to load config files from particular directory.
Fix affected packages as described in Details.

Affected packages

List of affected packages in rawhide in October 2012.

JSCookMenu
MochiKit
RackTables
ReviewBoard
WebCalendar
aeolus-conductor
apcupsd
askbot
bcfg2
beacon
bodhi
bugzilla
cacti
cgit
checkdns
ckeditor
cobbler
collectd
cvsweb
darkserver
dojo
dokuwiki
dspam
eclipse-phpeclipse
editarea
eucalyptus
freeipa
gallery2
gallery3
glpi
gnome-user-share
gridsite
ipcalculator
ipplan
koji
limph
mailgraph
mailman
man2html
mediawiki
mediawiki119
mimetex
mojomojo
moksha
nagios
netdisco
nocpulse-common
openlayers
ovirt-engine
pen
perl-HTML-Mason
php-laconica
php-voms-admin
phpMyAdmin
phpPgAdmin
phpesp
phpldapadmin
phplogcon
phpwapmail
postgresql-pgpoolAdmin
poweradmin
pwauth
python-django-dajax
queuegraph
roundcubemail
sahana
ser
smokeping
spacewalk-backend
squirrelmail
sticky-notes
sysusage
unicornscan
viewmtn
w3c-markup-validator
webacula
webalizer
websvn
wordpress
yawn
yourls
zarafa
zikula
zoneminder

How To Test

Installation of fixed package X should work as before to keep the backward compatibility, but it should install X, X-core and X-httpd packages.
Installation of X-core must not install "httpd" or another web server.

User Experience

Admins are able to install web application without httpd dependency.
Maintainers are able to add support for more webservers in their packages.

Dependencies

Only those described in Scope.

Contingency Plan

Documentation

Release Notes

Comments and Discussion

See Talk:Features/Your_Feature_Name

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted by FESCo.
   We also request that you maintain the same order of sections so that all of the feature pages are uniform.  -->
 <!-- The actual name of your feature page should look something like: Features/Your_Feature_Name.  This keeps all features in the same namespace -->
 = Features/WebserverDependency <!-- The name of your feature --> =
@@ Line 9: / Line 7: @@
 <!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this feature is and what it will do.  This information is used for the overall feature summary page for each release. -->
-Provide a way how to install and use webserver related packages (for example phpMyAdmin or Mailman) with any webserver in Fedora.
+Provide a way how to install and use web applications (for example phpMyAdmin or Mailman) with any web server in Fedora.
 == Owner ==
@@ Line 28: / Line 26: @@
 <!-- Expand on the summary, if appropriate.  A couple sentences suffices to explain the goal, but the more details you can provide the better. -->
-Currently, packages like phpMyAdmin or Mailman requires httpd installed. This is wrong, because they can work properly even with Lighttpd or nginx. They need httpd for two reason:
+Currently, packages like phpMyAdmin or Mailman requires httpd installed. This is wrong, because they can work properly even with Lighttpd or nginx. Following list contains the reasons why the particular package needs httpd and how to fix it:
+=== Package includes files owned by apache user/group ===
+This is needed when files have to be readable by webserver and therefore they have to have proper owner or group. Each webserver in Fedora has its own user/group under which it's running. This should be changed and one group shared by all servers should be introduced.
+Web application package maintainer then must use shared group instead of "apache" group.
+=== Package includes httpd configuration files ===
+To move web server related configuration into new subpackage, new packaging layout should be introduced (mailman is used as an example here):
+* mailman-core - Contains all mailman files except web server related configurations. This subpackage must not require any web server.
+* mailman-httpd (mailman-xxx) - Contains web server related configuration files and must require particular web server.
+* mailman - To keep the backward compatibility and upgrade from older versions, main package must require -core and -httpd subpackages.
+Maintainer does not have to create config files (and subpackages) for all webservers, but it must be possible to install -core subpackage without any dependency on particular web server, so the administrator can choose and configure the web server himself.
+=== Package requires web server specific modules ===
-. Their files have to be readable by webserver and therefore they have to have proper owner or group. Each webserver in Fedora has its own user/group under which it's running. This should be changed and one group shared by all servers should be introduced.
+If the package requires web server specific modules like mod_wsgi or mod_php, then those dependencies must be moved into web server specific subpackage like described above.
-. They contain configuration files just for httpd. Improved packages layout should be introduced to let admin choose if he wants to install configuration files for httpd/lighttpd or different webserver.
+=== Package "Requires: php" ===
+"php" as dependency is not needed, because too ambiguous (in fact this package is mod_php for apache).
+Instead, must requires the used SAPI (mod_php, php-fpm or php-cgi)
 == Benefit to Fedora ==
 <!-- What is the benefit to the platform?  If this is a major capability update, what has changed?  If this is a new feature, what capabilities does it bring? Why will Fedora become a better distribution or project because of this feature?-->
-* Ability to install various web applications without pulling httpd as a dependency.
+* Ability to install various web applications without pulling httpd as a dependency if it's not needed.
+* Maintainers are able to add support for more web servers in their packages.
+* Unification of web application packaging.
 == Scope ==
 <!-- What work do the developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
+# Discuss this feature with web servers maintainers in Fedora and get consensus on shared group name, add this group to Fedora and use it in web servers.
+# Change configuration of lighttpd and nginx to be able to load config files from particular directory.
+# Fix affected packages as described in Details.
+=== Affected packages ===
+List of affected packages in rawhide in October 2012.
+* JSCookMenu
+* MochiKit
+* RackTables
+* ReviewBoard
+* WebCalendar
+* aeolus-conductor
+* apcupsd
+* askbot
+* bcfg2
+* beacon
+* bodhi
+* bugzilla
+* cacti
+* cgit
+* checkdns
+* ckeditor
+* cobbler
+* collectd
+* cvsweb
+* darkserver
+* dojo
+* dokuwiki
+* dspam
+* eclipse-phpeclipse
+* editarea
+* eucalyptus
+* freeipa
+* gallery2
+* gallery3
+* glpi
+* gnome-user-share
+* gridsite
+* ipcalculator
+* ipplan
+* koji
+* limph
+* mailgraph
+* mailman
+* man2html
+* mediawiki
+* mediawiki119
+* mimetex
+* mojomojo
+* moksha
+* nagios
+* netdisco
+* nocpulse-common
+* openlayers
+* ovirt-engine
+* pen
+* perl-HTML-Mason
+* php-laconica
+* php-voms-admin
+* phpMyAdmin
+* phpPgAdmin
+* phpesp
+* phpldapadmin
+* phplogcon
+* phpwapmail
+* postgresql-pgpoolAdmin
+* poweradmin
+* pwauth
+* python-django-dajax
+* queuegraph
+* roundcubemail
+* sahana
+* ser
+* smokeping
+* spacewalk-backend
+* squirrelmail
+* sticky-notes
+* sysusage
+* unicornscan
+* viewmtn
+* w3c-markup-validator
+* webacula
+* webalizer
+* websvn
+* wordpress
+* yawn
+* yourls
+* zarafa
+* zikula
+* zoneminder
 == How To Test ==
@@ Line 57: / Line 171: @@
 . What are the expected results of those actions?
 -->
+* Installation of fixed package X should work as before to keep the backward compatibility, but it should install X, X-core and X-httpd packages.
+* Installation of X-core must not install "httpd" or another web server.
 == User Experience ==
 <!-- If this feature is noticeable by its target audience, how will their experiences change as a result?  Describe what they will see or notice. -->
+* Admins are able to install web application without httpd dependency.
+* Maintainers are able to add support for more webservers in their packages.
 == Dependencies ==
 <!-- What other packages (RPMs) depend on this package?  Are there changes outside the developers' control on which completion of this feature depends?  In other words, completion of another feature owned by someone else and might cause you to not be able to finish on time or that you would need to coordinate?  Other upstream projects like the kernel (if this is not a kernel feature)? -->
+Only those described in Scope.
 == Contingency Plan ==

Search

Features/WebserverDependency: Difference between revisions